Multifunctional biomass production systems –an overview with presentation of specific applications in India and Sweden

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Berndes ◽  
Pål Börjesson ◽  
Madelene Ostwald ◽  
Matilda Palm
1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 0146-0152 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Lorber ◽  
R. C. Fluck ◽  
J. W. Mishoe

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Victor D. Phillips ◽  
Devindar Singh

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oskar Englund ◽  
Pål Börjesson ◽  
Blas Mola-Yudego ◽  
Göran Berndes ◽  
Ioannis Dimitriou ◽  
...  

Abstract The land sector needs to increase biomass production to meet multiple demands while reducing negative land use impacts and transitioning from being a source to being a sink of carbon. The new Common Agricultural Policy of the EU (CAP) steers towards a more needs-based, targeted approach to addressing multiple environmental and climatic objectives, in coherence with other EU policies. In relation to this, new schemes are developed to offer farmers direct payments to adapt practices beneficial for climate, water, soil, air and biodiversity. Multifunctional biomass production systems have potential to reduce environmental impacts from agriculture while maintaining or increasing biomass production for the bioeconomy across Europe. Here, we present the first attempt to model the deployment of two such systems, riparian buffers and windbreaks, across >81.000 landscapes in Europe (EU27 + UK), aiming to quantify the resulting ecosystem services and environmental benefits, considering three deployment scenarios with different incentives for implementation. We found that these multifunctional biomass production systems can reduce N emissions to water and soil loss by wind erosion, respectively, down to a “low” impact level all over Europe, while simultaneously providing substantial environmental co-benefits, using less than 1% of the area under annual crops in the EU. The GHG emissions savings of utilizing the biomass produced in these systems for replacing fossil alternatives, combined with the increases in soil organic carbon, correspond to 1-1,4% of total GHG emissions in EU28. The introduction of “eco-schemes” in the new CAP may resolve some of the main barriers to implementation of large-scale multifunctional biomass production systems. Increasing the knowledge of these opportunities among all EU member states, before designing and introducing country-specific Eco-scheme options in the new CAP, is critical.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEANDRO PEREIRA PACHECO ◽  
◽  
MARINETE MARTINS DE SOUSA MONTEIRO ◽  
FABIANO ANDRÉ PETTER ◽  
JÚLIO CÉSAR AZEVEDO NÓBREGA ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Research on the performance of cover crops in crop systems of annual crops in the Brazilian state of Piauí contributes to increases in yield, greater efficiency of fertilizers and mitigation of environmental impacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of cover crops in terms of biomass production and the accumulation and release of nutrients during the crop season (November to April) in an oxisol in the Brazilian Cerrado in the state of Piauí that was submitted to different crop production systems including soybeans, maize and upland rice. The experiment was established during the 2010/11 and 2011/12 crop years in the rural area near the municipality of Bom Jesus, Piauí. The experimental design was a randomized block in a split-plot array. Different soil management systems (conventional and no-till) were evaluated in the main plots. Different crop production systems consisting of cover crops sown in the off-season (April to November), and annual crops sown during the crop season (November to April) were implemented in the subplots. The crop production systems that included Urochloa ruziziensis and Pennisetum glaucum overseeded on soybeans and Urochloa ruziziensis simultaneously intercropped with maize stood out in terms of biomass production and the accumulation and release of nutrients. Yields of maize and upland rice declined when sown under newly implemented no-till soil management.


Author(s):  
Daniel P. Geller ◽  
Keshav C. Das ◽  
Gary L. Hawkins ◽  
Brian H. Kiepper ◽  
Manjinder Singh

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Zsuffa ◽  
R.L. Gambles

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1821-1826 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Garland ◽  
C.L. Mackowiak ◽  
R.F. Strayer ◽  
B.W. Finger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document