scholarly journals A nutrient-based sustainability assessment of purpose-grown poplar and switchgrass biomass production systems established on marginal lands in Canada

Author(s):  
Muhammad Waseem Ashiq ◽  
Amir Behzad Bazrgar ◽  
Houman Fei ◽  
Brent Coleman ◽  
J. Kevin Vessey ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Berndes ◽  
Pål Börjesson ◽  
Madelene Ostwald ◽  
Matilda Palm

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Jenny Calabrese ◽  
Cesare Pacini ◽  
Concetta Vazzana ◽  
Mariana Nikolla

Dependence of conventional agricultural systems on chemical fertilizers and pesticidesmakes agricultural systems less stable and important drift polluters influencing to theregional and global sustainability. This problem made human being think about thealternative systems: agricultural systems that mimic natural systems and are friendly to theenvironment; those have higher economical efficiency concerning production level andcosts. The objective of the present study was sustainability assessment and comparison oforganic and conventional system with special focus environmental and economicalperformance. The case study consisted of two organic and conventional olive producingfarms in the South of Italy. The method used for sustainability assessment wasEnvironmental Accounting Information System (EAIS) that integrates togetherenvironmental (soil organic matter, soil erosion, genetic and landscape biodiversity,EPRIP, etc ) and economical indicators (gross margin). Data used for assessment ofEAIS indicators values were mainly collected from: farm economic-accounting systems,interviews, farm maps, area public organizations, bibliographical sources, farm nutrientaccounting systems, observations and field assessments and chemical soil analyses. Theindicator values measured into two farms were compared to theoretical or referenceindicator values. Based on indicator assessment it was concluded that organic olivegrowing farm had better performance than conventional farm.


1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 0146-0152 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Lorber ◽  
R. C. Fluck ◽  
J. W. Mishoe

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kripal Singh ◽  
Ashutosh Awasthi ◽  
Suresh Kumar Sharma ◽  
Shweta Singh ◽  
Shri Krishna Tewari

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 100444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katia Regina Evaristo de Jesus ◽  
Sérgio Alves Torquato ◽  
Pedro Gerber Machado ◽  
Catiana Regina Brumatti Zorzo ◽  
Bruno Oliveira Cardoso ◽  
...  

Resources ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Butti Al Shamsi ◽  
Paolo Guarnaccia ◽  
Salvatore Cosentino ◽  
Cherubino Leonardi ◽  
Paolo Caruso ◽  
...  

Climate change, recurrent economic and financial crises and food security issues are forcing society to look at the increasingly widespread use of “sustainable” production practices. These are often translated into innovations for businesses that are not always easily achievable other than through specific investments. This work sets out to assess the sustainability performance of organic farms, which represent a sustainable production model in terms of values, standards, practices and knowledge on the ground. The research was carried out in two geographical contexts (the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Sicily, Italy) which have certain environmental and socio-economic issues in common, particularly in productive sectors representative of organic agriculture. This was done with the help of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA, in the rest of the text) framework and social network analysis to study the sustainability performance of organic farms within non-structured local production systems in the form of formal enterprise networks that, on the contrary, operate with a recognized and common aim. The results demonstrate both their attainment of excellence and the existence of criticalities, thus, identifying routes to possible improvement.


1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Victor D. Phillips ◽  
Devindar Singh

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Esteban Henoc Medenou ◽  
Bossima Ivan Koura ◽  
Luc Hippolyte Dossa

<p>Analysis of production systems allows scientists to identify their weaknesses, particularly concerning production practices which require improvements at economic, social, and environmental levels. The present study aimed to characterise rabbit farms in the urban and peri-urban areas of South Benin and assess their sustainability using the DIAMOND method, a multicriteria sustainability assessment tool. Ninety-eight farmers were surveyed and individually interviewed. Categorical principal component and twostep cluster analyses were performed on information collected for a typology of farms. Sustainability scores were generated using the scoring scale of the DIAMOND tool. Five types of rabbit farms were identified as follows: modern extensive polyculture, traditional extensive monoculture, modern extensive monoculture, semi-intensive polyculture, and traditional extensive polyculture. Overall, all the rabbit farms had good scores for the economic sustainability pillar but were socially limited. They were all similar in their economic and environmental performances. In particular, semi-intensive farms were the most socially sustainable, whereas traditional farms (either in polyculture or monoculture) showed the lowest social performances. Furthermore, there were significant differences between farms for criteria relating to consumers’ demands and resource use. Semi-intensive farms responded best to consumers’ demands, whereas the traditional polyculture farm type was the most resource use efficient. Overall, in the urban and peri-urban areas of South Benin, the most sustainable rabbit farms were semi-intensive. Irrespective of farm type, positive coefficients of correlations were recorded among the three pillars of sustainability, being significant between the social and economic pillars on one hand, and between the social and environmental pillars on the other hand. These results suggest that efforts to improve farm social performance would also positively affect their economic and environmental performances and improve overall farm sustainability.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document