A spatial model for the economic evaluation of biomass production systems

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Victor D. Phillips ◽  
Devindar Singh
2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran Berndes ◽  
Pål Börjesson ◽  
Madelene Ostwald ◽  
Matilda Palm

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 1084-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ruvuna ◽  
J. F. Taylor ◽  
J. P. Walter ◽  
J. W. Turner ◽  
R. M. Thallman

1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 0146-0152 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Lorber ◽  
R. C. Fluck ◽  
J. W. Mishoe

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1258-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Manzone ◽  
Gianfranco Airoldi ◽  
Paolo Balsari

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunxiang Wu ◽  
Yao-chi Lu ◽  
Douglass J. Mills ◽  
C. Benjamin Coffman ◽  
John R. Teasdale

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oskar Englund ◽  
Pål Börjesson ◽  
Blas Mola-Yudego ◽  
Göran Berndes ◽  
Ioannis Dimitriou ◽  
...  

Abstract The land sector needs to increase biomass production to meet multiple demands while reducing negative land use impacts and transitioning from being a source to being a sink of carbon. The new Common Agricultural Policy of the EU (CAP) steers towards a more needs-based, targeted approach to addressing multiple environmental and climatic objectives, in coherence with other EU policies. In relation to this, new schemes are developed to offer farmers direct payments to adapt practices beneficial for climate, water, soil, air and biodiversity. Multifunctional biomass production systems have potential to reduce environmental impacts from agriculture while maintaining or increasing biomass production for the bioeconomy across Europe. Here, we present the first attempt to model the deployment of two such systems, riparian buffers and windbreaks, across >81.000 landscapes in Europe (EU27 + UK), aiming to quantify the resulting ecosystem services and environmental benefits, considering three deployment scenarios with different incentives for implementation. We found that these multifunctional biomass production systems can reduce N emissions to water and soil loss by wind erosion, respectively, down to a “low” impact level all over Europe, while simultaneously providing substantial environmental co-benefits, using less than 1% of the area under annual crops in the EU. The GHG emissions savings of utilizing the biomass produced in these systems for replacing fossil alternatives, combined with the increases in soil organic carbon, correspond to 1-1,4% of total GHG emissions in EU28. The introduction of “eco-schemes” in the new CAP may resolve some of the main barriers to implementation of large-scale multifunctional biomass production systems. Increasing the knowledge of these opportunities among all EU member states, before designing and introducing country-specific Eco-scheme options in the new CAP, is critical.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document