Risk–need–responsivity: Evaluating need‐to‐service matching with reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara C. Drawbridge ◽  
Debbie Truong ◽  
Ngoc T. Nguyen ◽  
Vincent L. Lorenti ◽  
Gina M. Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Service Matching ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity

Understanding the treatment needs of psychopaths using the Risk-Need- Responsivity Model

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley A. Murray ◽  
Jennifer E. Storey ◽  
Stephen D. Hart ◽  
Andrew Gray
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Needs ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity

The Integration of the Risk-Need-Responsivity into the SAMHSA Justice Diversion Trauma Recovery Pilot Projects

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Lynn Rynearson-Moody ◽  
Autumn M. Frei ◽  
Annette Christy ◽  
Colleen Clark
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Recovery ◽  
Pilot Projects ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity

Scope of Service: Matching Resident Needs and Provider Capabilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. e9-e11
Author(s):  
Rose Victor Lane
Keyword(s):  
Service Matching

scholarly journals Personalizing Child Protection: The Value of Responsivity Factors

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Anne M. E. Bijlsma ◽  
Claudia E. van der Put ◽  
Geertjan Overbeek ◽  
Geert Jan J. M. Stams ◽  
Mark Assink
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity ◽  
Forensic Care ◽  
Responsivity Principle

Personalization is an important strategy for enhancing the effectiveness of treatment that is aimed at reducing the risk of child maltreatment. In recent years, a growing body of research has appeared on how child protection can benefit from the principles of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model, but no attention has yet been paid to the implementation of the responsivity principle in child protection. Put simply, this principle states that treatment must be tailored to individual characteristics of clients to optimize its effectiveness. This study was the first to address how the responsivity principle can be of value in child protection. First, a systematic review of responsivity factors in forensic care was performed. Second, the relevance of applying each factor in child protection was examined through interviews with clinical professionals working in the field, who also provided suggestions on how treatment can be tailored to each of these factors. This resulted in an overview of seven responsivity factors all related to caregiver characteristics: problem denial, motivation to cooperate with treatment, psychological problems, cognitive abilities, cultural background, practical barriers such as financial problems and social support, and barriers to specific treatment types such as group therapy. Implications and recommendations for strengthening clinical practice are discussed.

Risk-Need-Responsivity Meets Mental Health: Implementation Challenges in Probation Case Planning

2021 ◽  
pp. 009385482110084
Author(s):  
Gina M. Vincent ◽  
Rachael T. Perrault ◽  
Dara C. Drawbridge ◽  
Gretchen O. Landry ◽  
Thomas Grisso
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Probation Officers ◽  
Violence Risk ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Implementation Effort ◽  
Case Planning ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity

This study examined the feasibility of and fidelity to risk/needs assessment, mental health screening, and risk-need-responsivity (RNR)-based case planning within juvenile probation in two states. The researcher-guided implementation effort included the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-2 (MAYSI-2), Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), and policies to prioritize criminogenic needs while using mental health services only when warranted. Data from 53 probation officers (POs) and 553 youths indicated three of five offices had high fidelity to administration and case planning policies. The interrater reliability ( n = 85; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC][A, 1] = .92 [Northern state] and .80 [Southern state]) and predictive validity ( n = 455; Exp[B] = 1.83) of SAVRY risk ratings were significant. There was an overreliance on mental health services; 48% of youth received these referrals when only 20% screened as having mental health needs. Barriers to fidelity to RNR practices in some offices included assessments not being conducted before disposition, lack of service availability, and limited buy-in from a few stakeholders.

The Research of Semantic Web Service Matching Algorithm Based on the Formal Concept Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 760-762 ◽  
pp. 1708-1712
Author(s):  
Ying Fang Li ◽  
Ying Jiang Li ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Yang Bo
Keyword(s):  
Semantic Web ◽  
Web Service ◽  
Formal Concept Analysis ◽  
Service Discovery ◽  
Concept Lattice ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
Formal Concept ◽  
Semantic Web Service ◽  
Matching Algorithm ◽  
Service Matching

At present, as the number of web services resources on the network drastically increased, how to quickly and efficiently find the needed services from publishing services has become a problem to resolve. Aiming at the problems of low efficiency in service discovery of traditional web service, the formal concept analysis ( FCA) is introduced into the semantic Web service matching, and a Matching Algorithm based semantic web service is proposed. With considering the concept of limited inheritance,this method introduces the concept of limited inheritance to the semantic similarity calculation based on the concept lattice. It is significant in enhancing the service function matching in practical applications through adjust the calculation.

Correctional Rehabilitation and Human Functioning: An Embodied, Embedded, and Enactive Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Harry Dent
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Theory ◽  
Treatment Utility ◽  
Enactive Approach ◽  
Human Functioning ◽  
The World ◽  
Correctional Rehabilitation ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity ◽  
Level I ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Adaptive Relationship

<p>In order for correctional rehabilitation practices to be maximally effective, they should be grounded in well-developed psychological theory about the causes, development, and nature of crime. This thesis argues that these theories of crime should be based in an underlying perspective of human functioning, or how people work at a fundamental level. I argue that this level of theory has been neglected in theories of crime, as demonstrated through an evaluation of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model of rehabilitation, which currently stands as the most popular and widely used rehabilitation framework throughout much of the world. This perspective is understood to implicitly present a view of functioning which is reward-oriented, multifactorial, norm-based, and modular, resulting in limited explanatory value and diminished treatment efficacy. I then suggest an alternative model of functioning as being embodied, embedded, and enactive (3e). 3e places an emphasis on the individual as an embodied whole, in an adaptive relationship with their physical and social environment. 3e prioritises the affective experience and agency of the individual, with a commitment to viewing the person as a functional whole drawing on comprehensive multilevel explanations. I outline how this perspective could be used to inform the explanation of crime, before applying the model to an exemplar to demonstrate the potential treatment utility of a 3e approach to correctional rehabilitation, as opposed to an RNR approach.</p>

Approaching Correctional Treatment from a Programmatic Standpoint: Risk-Need-Responsivity and Beyond

2018 ◽  
pp. 283-303
Author(s):  
Ashley B. Batastini ◽  
Joshua B. Hill ◽  
Alexandra Repke ◽  
Laura M. Gulledge ◽  
Zoe K. Livengood
Keyword(s):  
Correctional Treatment ◽  
Risk Need Responsivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document