scholarly journals Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with anti–PD‐1 therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (14) ◽  
pp. 4962-4970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirish Dharmapuri ◽  
Umut Özbek ◽  
Jung‐Yi Lin ◽  
Max Sung ◽  
Myron Schwartz ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A389-A389
Author(s):  
Philippe Merle ◽  
Helena Verdaguer Mata ◽  
Congying Xie ◽  
Richard Hubner ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
...  

BackgroundTislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated clinical activity and was well-tolerated in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Phase 2 RATIONALE-208 study (NCT03419897). We explored whether baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) or their post-treatment change correlated with clinical efficacy of tislelizumab treatment.MethodsEligible patients (>18 years) who had received ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy for advanced HCC were administered open-label tislelizumab (200 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks until no further clinical benefit was observed. NLR and PLR were assessed using peripheral blood samples collected at baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1), C3D1, and C4D1. Survival analysis (progression free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) was conducted by Kaplan-Meier method and survival rate at risk was compared by log rank test. Logistic regression was used to analyze association of post-treatment change of NLR or PLR with objective response rate (ORR). In the baseline analysis, median NLR or PLR in this study was used as a cut-off. All statistical analysis results are post-hoc exploratory and thereby p values are descriptive.ResultsOverall, 249 patients were enrolled, of which 249, 234, 203, and 186 patients had evaluable NLR and PLR data at baseline, C2D1, C3D1, and C4D1, respectively. Analysis of NLR at baseline, using median NLR (3.2) as cut-off, demonstrated higher OS (p=0.0024) and PFS (p=0.071) in NLR-low versus NLR-high groups (median OS [mOS]:17.4 versus 9.9 months; median PFS [mPFS]: 2.8 versus 1.5 months). Analysis of PLR at baseline, using median PLR (141.4) as cut-off, showed higher OS (p=0.0085) and PFS (p<0.0001) in PLR-low versus PLR-high groups (mOS: 16.2 versus 10.8 months; mPFS: 2.8 versus 1.4 months). In post-treatment analysis, patients with decreased NLR or PLR at C2D1, C3D1 or C4D1 had higher ORR (table 1) and longer OS (figure 1) compared with patients with increased NLR or PLR at each timepoint.Abstract 362 Table 1Post-treatment decreases in NLR or PLR were associated with response to tislelizumab monotherapyAbstract 362 Figure 1Post-treatment decreases in NLR or PLR were associated with improved OS following tislelizumab monotherapyConclusionsIn patients with previously treated advanced HCC that received tislelizumab monotherapy, lower baseline NLR or PLR was associated with longer OS and PFS, and post-treatment decreases of NLR or PLR were associated with higher ORR and longer OS. These observations support NLR and PLR as potential prognostic biomarkers in patients with advanced HCC treated with tislelizumab and will be further investigated in an on-going Phase 3 study (NCT03412773).AcknowledgementsThis study is sponsored by BeiGene Ltd. Medical writing support for the development of this abstract, under direction of the authors, was provided by Claire White, PhD, and Kirsty Millar, MSc, of Ashfield MedComms, an Ashfield Health company, and was funded by BeiGene Ltd.Trial RegistrationNCT03419897Ethics ApprovalThis study was conducted according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice guidelines, the principles of informed consent and the requirements of the public registration of clinical trials. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to screening. The protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee and was monitored by the investigators and study sponsor.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 967-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Zheng ◽  
Jianye Cai ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Kaining Zeng ◽  
Liying He ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Systemic inflammatory response (SIR) is widely considered as a preoperative risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) outcomes. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), two of the prognostic indices, have been investigated in post-therapeutic recurrence and survival of HCC. Here, we quantify the prognostic value of these two biomarkers and evaluate their consistency in different HCC therapies. Methods: A systematic review of electronic database of the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted to search for associations between the NLR and PLR in the blood and clinical outcomes of HCC. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were the primary outcomes, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were explored as effect measures. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the heterogeneity of different therapies. Results: A total of 24 articles comprising 6318 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled outcomes revealed that a high NLR before treatment predicted a poor OS (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.76, p<0.001) and poor RFS (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.82, p=0.001). Moreover, an increased PLR predicted a poor OS (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.98, p<0.001) and earlier HCC recurrence (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.91, p<0.001). In addition, both the NLR and PLR were identified as independent risk factors for predicting OS and RFS in HCC patients in a subgroup analysis of different treatment types, including curative or palliative therapy; however, these results were not found in the sorafenib subgroup due to limited clinical research. Conclusion: An increased NLR or PLR indicated poor outcomes for patients with HCC. The NLR and PLR may be considered as reliable and inexpensive biomarkers for making clinical decisions regarding HCC treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Gomes da Fonseca ◽  
Romulado Barroso-Sousa ◽  
Afonso da Silva Alves Bento ◽  
Bruna Paccola Blanco ◽  
Gabriel Luis Valente ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eren Pek ◽  
Fatma Beyazit ◽  
Nilay Sen Korkmaz

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in vaginitis patients. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in Afyon Dinar State Hospital between July 2016 to August 2017. A total of 64 bacterial vaginosis (BV) patients, 66 vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) patients and 65 age-matched control subjects were enrolled. NLR, PLR, mean platelet volume (MPV), red cell distribution width (RDW) and other conventional inflammatory marker values were recorded for all patients before and after treatment. Results: In the BV group, NLR values were found to be elevated compared to VVC and healthy controls [2.9 (1.2-14.7), 2.1 (1.1-11.7) and 2.1 (0.8-7.0), respectively] (p=0.008). Although not found to be statistically significant, the median NLR levels of BV patients decreased from 2.9 (1.2-14.7) to 2.4 (1.2-7.0) after treatment. PLR levels did not show a statistically significant difference between the three groups (p=0.970). The cut-off value of the NLR for BV was 2.19, with 67.2% sensitivity and 63.8% specificity. Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that NLR levels are elevated in bacterial vaginosis and NLR levels can be used as a reflection of systemic inflammatory response in vaginosis patients. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2774 How to cite this:Pek E, Beyazit F, Korkmaz NS. Predictive value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Vaginitis. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):250-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2774 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 14408-14415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Personeni ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Giovanni Abbadessa ◽  
Camillo Porta ◽  
Ivan Borbath ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document