scholarly journals Selecting the number of factors in principal component analysis by permutation testing-Numerical and practical aspects

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. e2937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Vitale ◽  
Johan A. Westerhuis ◽  
Tormod Naes ◽  
Age K. Smilde ◽  
Onno E. de Noord ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Daniel Ledesma ◽  
Pedro Valero-Mora ◽  
Guillermo Macbeth

AbstractExploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Component Analysis are two data analysis methods that are commonly used in psychological research. When applying these techniques, it is important to determine how many factors to retain. This decision is sometimes based on a visual inspection of the Scree plot. However, the Scree plot may at times be ambiguous and open to interpretation. This paper aims to explore a number of graphical and computational improvements to the Scree plot in order to make it more valid and informative. These enhancements are based on dynamic and interactive data visualization tools, and range from adding Parallel Analysis results to "linking" the Scree plot with other graphics, such as factor-loadings plots. To illustrate our proposed improvements, we introduce and describe an example based on real data on which a principal component analysis is appropriate. We hope to provide better graphical tools to help researchers determine the number of factors to retain.


2010 ◽  
pp. 171-193
Author(s):  
Sean Eom

This chapter describes the factor procedure. The first section of the chapter begins with the definition of factor analysis. This is the statistical techniques whose common objective is to represent a set of variables in terms of a smaller number of hypothetical variables (factor). ACA uses principal component analysis to group authors into several catagories with similar lines of research. We also present many different approaches of preparing datasets including manual data inputs, in-file statement, and permanent datasets. We discuss each of the key SAS statements including DATA, INPUT, CARDS, PROC, and RUN. In addition, we examine several options statements to specify the followings: method for extracting factors; number of factors, rotation method, and displaying output options.


1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 929-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver C. S. Tzeng

This note summarizes my remarks on the application of reliability of the principal component and the eigenvalue-greater-than-1 rule for determining the number of factors in principal component analysis of a correlation matrix. Due to the unpredictability and uselessness of the reliability approach and the Kaiser-Guttman rule, research workers are encouraged to use other methods such as the scree test.


2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Liu ◽  
Bruno D. Zumbo

There is a lack of research on the effects of outliers on the decisions about the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis, especially for outliers arising from unintended and unknowingly included subpopulations. The purpose of the present research was to investigate how outliers from an unintended and unknowingly included subpopulation affected the decisions about the number of factors to retain using four commonly used methods separately. The results showed that all the decision methods could provide biased results and the number of factors could be inflated, deflated, or remain the same depending on the decision methods used and outlier conditions. The findings also revealed that symmetric outliers did not affect the three principal component analysis–based methods but affected chi-square (ML) sequential tests. Finally, sample size did not play a role in the effect of outliers.


VASA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirchberger ◽  
Finger ◽  
Müller-Bühl

Background: The Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) is a short questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). The objective of this study was to translate the ICQ into German and to investigate the psychometric properties of the German ICQ version in patients with IC. Patients and methods: The original English version was translated using a forward-backward method. The resulting German version was reviewed by the author of the original version and an experienced clinician. Finally, it was tested for clarity with 5 German patients with IC. A sample of 81 patients were administered the German ICQ. The sample consisted of 58.0 % male patients with a median age of 71 years and a median IC duration of 36 months. Test of feasibility included completeness of questionnaires, completion time, and ratings of clarity, length and relevance. Reliability was assessed through a retest in 13 patients at 14 days, and analysis of Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency. Construct validity was investigated using principal component analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the ICQ scores with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) as well as clinical measures. Results: The ICQ was completely filled in by 73 subjects (90.1 %) with an average completion time of 6.3 minutes. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient reached 0.75. Intra-class correlation for test-retest reliability was r = 0.88. Principal component analysis resulted in a 3 factor solution. The first factor explained 51.5 of the total variation and all items had loadings of at least 0.65 on it. The ICQ was significantly associated with the SF-36 and treadmill-walking distances whereas no association was found for resting ABPI. Conclusions: The German version of the ICQ demonstrated good feasibility, satisfactory reliability and good validity. Responsiveness should be investigated in further validation studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document