ChemInform Abstract: Central Bond in the Three CN× Dimers NC-CN, CN-CN, and CN-NC: Electron Pair Bonding and Pauli Repulsion Effects.

ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (38) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
F. M. BICKELHAUPT ◽  
N. M. M. NIBBERING ◽  
E. M. VAN WEZENBEEK ◽  
E. J. BAERENDS
1992 ◽  
Vol 96 (12) ◽  
pp. 4864-4873 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Matthias Bickelhaupt ◽  
Nico M. M. Nibbering ◽  
Egbert M. Van Wezenbeek ◽  
Evert Jan Baerends

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (35) ◽  
pp. 5071-5074 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Luis Casals-Sainz ◽  
F. Jiménez-Grávalos ◽  
E. Francisco ◽  
A. Martín Pendás

Charge-shift bonding (CSB) has been introduced as a distinct third family of electron-pair links that adds to the covalent and ionic tradition.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Zhao ◽  
W. H. Eugen Schwarz ◽  
Gernot Frenking

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2410-2418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaiyu Zhang ◽  
David Danovich ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Benoît Braïda ◽  
Philippe C. Hiberty ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sason Shaik ◽  
David Danovich ◽  
Benoit Braida ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Philippe C. Hiberty

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Zhao ◽  
Markus Hermann ◽  
W. H. Eugen Schwarz ◽  
Gernot Frenking

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 2160-2168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef Jirman

The 1H and 13C NMR spectra have been measured of six trans-azobenzenes substituted at 2 and 2’ positions with substituents favourable for complex formation with a metal (OH, NH2, NHCOCH3, COOH). From the standpoint of NMR such substituted trans-azobenzenes are present in solution in a rapid equilibrium following from rotation around the bond between C-1 of phenyl group and N atom of azo linkage. The predominant form has the substituent in the syn-position with respect to the free electron pair of the nearer azo nitrogen atom. The equilibrium is affected by dipolar aprotic solvents (such as hexadeuteriodimethyl sulfoxide) by decreasing the presence of the predominant form by 1 to 11%.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Grebe ◽  
Annika Sharma ◽  
Sara M. Freeman ◽  
Michelle C. Palumbo ◽  
Heather B. Patisaul ◽  
...  

AbstractContemporary theory that emphasizes the roles of oxytocin and vasopressin in mammalian sociality has been shaped by seminal vole research that revealed interspecific variation in neuroendocrine circuitry by mating system. However, substantial challenges exist in interpreting and translating these rodent findings to other mammalian groups, including humans, making research on nonhuman primates crucial. Both monogamous and non-monogamous species exist within Eulemur, a genus of strepsirrhine primate, offering a rare opportunity to broaden a comparative perspective on oxytocin and vasopressin neurocircuitry with increased evolutionary relevance to humans. We performed oxytocin and arginine vasopressin 1a receptor autoradiography on 12 Eulemur brains from seven closely related species to (1) characterize receptor distributions across the genus, and (2) examine differences between monogamous and non-monogamous species in regions part of putative “pair-bonding circuits”. We find some binding patterns across Eulemur reminiscent of olfactory-guided rodents, but others congruent with more visually oriented anthropoids, consistent with lemurs occupying an ‘intermediary’ evolutionary niche between haplorhine primates and other mammalian groups. We find little evidence of a “pair-bonding circuit” in Eulemur akin to those proposed in previous rodent or primate research. Mapping neuropeptide receptors in these nontraditional species questions existing assumptions and informs proposed evolutionary explanations about the biological bases of monogamy.


BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Tripp ◽  
Alejandro Berrio ◽  
Lisa A. McGraw ◽  
Mikhail V. Matz ◽  
Jamie K. Davis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pair bonding with a reproductive partner is rare among mammals but is an important feature of human social behavior. Decades of research on monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), along with comparative studies using the related non-bonding meadow vole (M. pennsylvanicus), have revealed many of the neural and molecular mechanisms necessary for pair-bond formation in that species. However, these studies have largely focused on just a few neuromodulatory systems. To test the hypothesis that neural gene expression differences underlie differential capacities to bond, we performed RNA-sequencing on tissue from three brain regions important for bonding and other social behaviors across bond-forming prairie voles and non-bonding meadow voles. We examined gene expression in the amygdala, hypothalamus, and combined ventral pallidum/nucleus accumbens in virgins and at three time points after mating to understand species differences in gene expression at baseline, in response to mating, and during bond formation. Results We first identified species and brain region as the factors most strongly associated with gene expression in our samples. Next, we found gene categories related to cell structure, translation, and metabolism that differed in expression across species in virgins, as well as categories associated with cell structure, synaptic and neuroendocrine signaling, and transcription and translation that varied among the focal regions in our study. Additionally, we identified genes that were differentially expressed across species after mating in each of our regions of interest. These include genes involved in regulating transcription, neuron structure, and synaptic plasticity. Finally, we identified modules of co-regulated genes that were strongly correlated with brain region in both species, and modules that were correlated with post-mating time points in prairie voles but not meadow voles. Conclusions These results reinforce the importance of pre-mating differences that confer the ability to form pair bonds in prairie voles but not promiscuous species such as meadow voles. Gene ontology analysis supports the hypothesis that pair-bond formation involves transcriptional regulation, and changes in neuronal structure. Together, our results expand knowledge of the genes involved in the pair bonding process and open new avenues of research in the molecular mechanisms of bond formation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document