Effect of zeta potentials of oil droplets and bubbles on flotation of oil-in-water mixtures

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Okada ◽  
Yasuharu Akagi ◽  
Naoya Yoshioka
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Hou ◽  
Ming Han ◽  
Jinxun Wang

AbstractThis work investigates the effect of the surface charges of oil droplets and carbonate rocks in brine and in surfactant solutions on oil production. The influences of the cations in brine and the surfactant types on the zeta-potentials of both oil droplets and carbonate rock particles are studied. It is found that the addition of anionic and cationic surfactants in brine result in both negative or positive zeta-potentials of rock particles and oil droplets respectively, while the zwitterionic surfactant induces a positive charge on rock particles and a negative charge on oil droplets. Micromodels with a CaCO3 nanocrystal layer coated on the flow channels were used in the oil displacement tests. The results show that when the oil-water interfacial tension (IFT) was at 10−1 mN/m, the injection of an anionic surfactant (SDS-R1) solution achieved 21.0% incremental oil recovery, higher than the 12.6% increment by the injection of a zwitterionic surfactant (SB-A2) solution. When the IFT was lowered to 10−3 mM/m, the injection of anionic/non-ionic surfactant SMAN-l1 solution with higher absolute zeta potential value (ζoil + ζrock) of 34 mV has achieved higher incremental oil recovery (39.4%) than the application of an anionic/cationic surfactant SMAC-l1 solution with a lower absolute zeta-potential value of 22 mV (30.6%). This indicates that the same charge of rocks and oil droplets improves the transportation of charged oil/water emulsion in the porous media. This work reveals that the surface charge in surfactant flooding plays an important role in addition to the oil/water interfacial tension reduction and the rock wettability alteration.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saranya Pullanchery ◽  
Sergey Kulik ◽  
halil okur ◽  
Hilton. B. de Aguiar ◽  
Sylvie Roke

Hydrophobic oil droplets, particles and air bubbles can be dispersed in water as kinetically stabilized dispersions. It has been established since the 19th century that such objects harbor a negative electrostatic potential roughly twice larger than the thermal energy. The source of this charge continues to be one of the core observations in relation to hydrophobicity and its molecular explanation is still debated. What is clear though, is that the stabilizing interaction in these systems is understood in terms of electrostatic repulsion via DLVO theory. Recent work [Carpenter et al., PNAS 116 (2019) 9214] has added another element into the discussion, reporting the creation of bare near-zero charged droplets of oil in water that are stable for several days. Key to the creation of the droplets is a rigorous glassware cleaning procedure. Here, we investigate these conclusions and show that the cleaning procedure of glassware has no influence on the electrophoretic mobility of the droplets, that oil droplets with near-zero charge are unstable, and provide an alternative possible explanation for the observations involving glass surface chemistry.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Bragg ◽  
Edward H. Owens

ABSTRACT Interactions of fine mineral particles with oil stranded on shorelines following spills has been shown to be an important natural cleansing process, capable of accelerating oil removal in most environments, and particularly in low energy environments where wave action and abrasion are negligible. This process involves formation of solids-stabilized oil-in-water emulsions by flocculation of micron-sized mineral fines with oil droplets in the presence of water containing ions (such as sea water). Once flocculated, the oil droplets do not coalesce, and the oil no longer adheres strongly to shoreline sediments, facilitating its removal and dispersion by waves and tidal currents. The importance of the flocculation process to the rate of oil removal from sediments, the conditions needed for the process to occur, and the properties of the resulting floe have been studied in detail for the Exxon Valdez spill. Its potential role in shoreline cleansing also has been studied for other recent spills: Metula (1974, Chile), Arrow (1970, Nova Scotia), BIOS test spill (1981, Cape Hatt, Northwest Territories), Nosac Forest (1993, Tacoma, Washington), and Fred Bouchard (1993, Tampa, Florida). This paper summarizes the various laboratory and field studies and discusses the findings within the contexts of natural shoreline cleansing, and the use of certain treatment techniques.


2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 1712-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Zeeb ◽  
Johanna Beicht ◽  
Thomas Eisele ◽  
Monika Gibis ◽  
Lutz Fischer ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 459-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L Jayme ◽  
D.E Dunstan ◽  
M.L Gee

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (32) ◽  
pp. 13534-13541
Author(s):  
Xin Gao ◽  
Qiang Ma ◽  
Zhengwei Jin ◽  
Pei Nian ◽  
Zheng Wang

A switchable superlyophobic ZIF-8 membrane can selectively remove oil droplets in oil-in-water emulsions via superoleophobicity and water droplets in water-in-oil emulsions via superhydrophobicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document