scholarly journals TP53mutation does not confer a poor outcome in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who are treated with frontline hyper-CVAD-based regimens

Cancer ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (19) ◽  
pp. 3717-3724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna ◽  
Preetesh Jain ◽  
Koichi Takahashi ◽  
Nicholas J. Short ◽  
Guilin Tang ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy Z. Horvat ◽  
Amanda N. Seddon ◽  
Adebayo Ogunniyi ◽  
Amber C. King ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
...  

Objective: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of Food and Drug Administration approved and promising immunotherapy agents used in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Data Sources: A literature search was performed of PubMed and MEDLINE databases (1950 to July 2017) and of abstracts from the American Society of Hematology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Searches were performed utilizing the following key terms: rituximab, blinatumomab, inotuzumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, Blincyto, Rituxan, Gazyva, Arzerra, CAR T-cell, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). Study Selection/Data Extraction: Studies of pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of rituximab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, inotuzumab, blinatumomab, and CAR T-cells in the treatment of adult patients with ALL were identified. Data Synthesis: Conventional chemotherapy has been the mainstay in the treatment of ALL, producing cure rates of approximately 90% in pediatrics, but it remains suboptimal in adult patients. As such, more effective consolidative modalities and novel therapies for relapsed/refractory disease are needed for adult patients with ALL. In recent years, anti-CD20 antibodies, blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and CD19-targeted CAR T-cells have drastically changed the treatment landscape of B-cell ALL. Conclusion: Outcomes of patients with relapsed disease are improving thanks to new therapies such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and CAR T-cells. Although the efficacy of these therapies is impressive, they are not without toxicity, both physical and financial. The optimal sequencing of these therapies still remains a question.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (6) ◽  
pp. 1375-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan J. Cornelissen ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Gregor E. G. Verhoef ◽  
Mars B. van 't Veer ◽  
Marinus H. J. van Oers ◽  
...  

Abstract While commonly accepted in poor-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is still disputed in adult patients with standard-risk ALL. We evaluated outcome of patients with ALL in first complete remission (CR1), according to a sibling donor versus no-donor comparison. Eligible patients (433) were entered in 2 consecutive, prospective studies, of whom 288 (67%) were younger than 55 years, in CR1, and eligible to receive consolidation by either an autologous SCT or an allo-SCT. Allo-SCT was performed in 91 of 96 patients with a compatible sibling donor. Cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were, respectively, 24 and 55% for patients with a donor versus those without a donor (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 0.23-0.60; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality estimated 16% (± 4) at 5 years after allo-SCT. As a result, disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly better in the donor group: 60 versus 42% in the no-donor group (HR: 0.60; 0.41-0.89; P = .01). After risk-group analysis, improved outcome was more pronounced in standard-risk patients with a donor, who experienced an overall survival of 69% at 5 years (P = .05). In conclusion, standard-risk ALL patients with a sibling donor may show favorable survival following SCT, due to both a strong reduction of relapse and a modest nonrelapse mortality. This trial is registered with http://www.trialregister.nl under trial ID NTR228.


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1126-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Tao Jin ◽  
Brian Bolwell ◽  
Edward Copelan ◽  
Mikkael Sekeres ◽  
...  

Haematologica ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Oriol ◽  
S. Vives ◽  
J. M. Hernandez-Rivas ◽  
M. Tormo ◽  
I. Heras ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corentin Orvain ◽  
Marie Balsat ◽  
Emmanuelle Tavernier ◽  
Jean-Pierre Marolleau ◽  
Thomas Pabst ◽  
...  

Patients undergoing treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at risk for thrombosis, in part due to the use of L-asparaginase (L-ASP). Antithrombin (AT) replacement has been suggested to prevent VTE and thus might increase exposure to ASP. We report herein the results of the prophylactic replacement strategy in the pediatric-inspired prospective GRAALL-2005 study. Between 2006 and 2014, 784 adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL were included. The incidence rate of VTE was 16% with 69% of them occurring during induction therapy. Most patients received AT supplementation (87%). After excluding patients who did not receive L-ASP or developed thrombosis before L-ASP, AT supplementation did not have a significant impact on VTE (8% versus 14%, OR: 0.6, p=0.1). Fibrinogen concentrates administration was associated with an increased risk of VTE (17% versus 9%, OR 2.2, p=0.02) whereas transfusion of fresh-frozen plasma had no effect. Heparin prophylaxis was associated with an increased risk of VTE (13% versus 7%, OR 1.9, p=0.04). Prophylactic measures were not associated with an increased risk of grade 3-4 bleeding complications. The rate of VTE recurrence after L-ASP reintroduction was 3% (1/34). In ALL patients receiving L-ASP therapy, the use of fibrinogen concentrates may increase the risk of thrombosis and should be restricted to rare patients with hypofibrinogenemia-induced hemorrhage. Patients developed VTE despite extensive AT supplementation which advocates for additional prophylactic measures. While this large descriptive study was not powered to demonstrate the efficacy of these prophylactic measures, it provides important insight to guide future trial design. NCT00327678.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document