scholarly journals Analytical Review of Life‐Cycle Environmental Impacts of Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies

ChemSusChem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia‐Garcia ◽  
Marta Cruz Fernandez ◽  
Katy Armstrong ◽  
Steven Woolass ◽  
Peter Styring
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 4482-4496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesam Ostovari ◽  
André Sternberg ◽  
André Bardow

Our LCA-based assessment showed that all considered CCU technologies for mineralization can reduce climate impacts over the entire life cycle due to the permanent storage of CO2 and the credit for substituting conventional products.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing An ◽  
Richard S. Middleton ◽  
Yingnan Li

Cement manufacturing is one of the most energy and CO2 intensive industries. With the growth of cement production, CO2 emissions are increasing rapidly too. Carbon capture and storage is the most feasible new technology option to reduce CO2 emissions in the cement industry. More research on environmental impacts is required to provide the theoretical basis for the implementation of carbon capture and storage in cement production. In this paper, GaBi software and scenario analysis were employed to quantitatively analyze and compare the environmental impacts of cement production with and without carbon capture and storage technology, from the perspective of a life-cycle assessment; aiming to promote sustainable development of the cement industry. Results of two carbon capture and storage scenarios show decreases in the impacts of global warming potential and some environmental impacts. However, other scenarios show a significant increase in other environmental impacts. In particular, post-combustion carbon capture technology can bring a more pronounced increase in toxicity potential. Therefore, effective measures must be taken into account to reduce the impact of toxicity when carbon capture and storage is employed in cement production. CO2 transport and storage account for only a small proportion of environmental impacts. For post-combustion carbon capture, most of the environmental impacts come from the unit of combined heat and power and carbon capture, with the background production of MonoEthanolAmine contributing significantly. In combined heat and power plants, natural gas is more advantageous than a 10% coal-saving, and thermal efficiency is a key parameter affecting the environmental impacts. Future research should focus on exploring cleaner and effective absorbents or seeking the alternative fuel in combined heat and power plants for post-combustion carbon capture. If the power industry is the first to deploy carbon capture and storage, oxy-combustion carbon capture is an excellent choice for the cement industry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 6682-6713
Author(s):  
Takayuki Katagiri ◽  
Yutaka Amao

The light-driven CCU with molecular and enzyme-based catalysts for C–H bond activation and building C–C bonds with CO2 and photofunctional materials are introduced and discussed the outline of life cycle assessment of a typical system for light-driven CCU systems.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 2494-2501 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.H. Khoo ◽  
J. Bu ◽  
R.L. Wong ◽  
S.Y. Kuan ◽  
P.N. Sharratt

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2253-2263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Thonemann ◽  
Massimo Pizzol

Carbon capture and utilization is recommendable within the chemical industry from an environmental perspective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document