Multi-Rater Performance Assessment as a Catalyst for Chair Professional Development

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Kenneth R. Ryalls ◽  
Steve Benton
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Dijkhuizen ◽  
Jacqueline Bustraan ◽  
Arnout J. de Beaufort ◽  
Sophie I. Velthuis ◽  
Erik W. Driessen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Winslade ◽  
Robyn M. Tamblyn ◽  
Laurel K. Taylor ◽  
Lambert W. T. Schuwirth ◽  
Cees P. M. Van der Vleuten

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul V. Bredeson ◽  
Jay Paredes Scribner

In an environment increasingly skeptical of the effectiveness of large-scale professional development activities, this study examines K-12 educators' reasons for participating and beliefs in the utility in a large-scale professional development conference. Pre- and post-conference surveys revealed that while financial support played a significant role in educators' ability to participate, they were drawn to the conference by the promise to learn substantive issues related to, in this case, performance assessment—what it means, how to implement it, and how to address community concerns. In spite of the conference's utility as a means to increase awareness of critical issues and to facilitate formal and informal learning, well conceived linkages to transfer new knowledge to the school and classroom were lacking.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-241
Author(s):  
Alper Şahin

There are several student performance are assessed in Intensive English Programs (IEP) worldwide in each academic year. These student performances are mostly graded by human raters with a certain degree of error. However, the accuracy of these performance assessment is of utmost importance because they feed data into some high stakes decisions about the students and such performance assessments constitute a large number of students’ scores. Therefore, the accuracy of these performance assessments should be given priority by the IEPs. However, when the current rater performance monitors systems which can help the administrators of IEPs to monitor rater performance in performance assessment are away from practicality because they require the use of complex mathematical models and specialized software. A practical and easy to maintain rater performance categorization system is proposed in this paper and it was accompanied by a sample study  Its benefits to the administrators of IEPs and their raters are also discussed besides its practical considerations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
Pilvi Alp ◽  
Anu Epner ◽  
Hille Pajupuu

Assessment reliability is vital in language testing. We have studied the influence of empathy, age and experience on the assessment of the writing component in Estonian Language proficiency examinations at levels A2–C1, and the effect of the rater properties on rater performance at different language levels. The study included 5,270 examination papers, each assessed by two raters. Raters were aged 34–73 and had a rating experience of 3–15 years. The empathy level (EQ) of all 26 A2–C1 raters had previously been measured by Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright’s self-report questionnaire. The results of the correlation analysis indicated that in case of regular training (and with three or more years of experience), the rater’s level of empathy, age and experience did not have a significant effect on the score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document