Meta-analysis of the nonword reading deficit in specific reading disorder

Dyslexia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia A. Herrmann ◽  
Tom Matyas ◽  
Chris Pratt
2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Alamargot ◽  
Marie-France Morin ◽  
Erika Simard-Dupuis

Developmental dyslexia is defined as a specific reading disorder but is also thought to be underpinned by a deficit in motor skills that may well affect handwriting performance. However, the results of studies addressing this issue are not consistent. The present study was, therefore, designed to better understand the functioning of handwriting in children with dyslexia, by conducting an analysis of the legibility and fluency of handwritten letters, supplemented by an assessment of motor skills. The performances of 15 children with dyslexia ( Mage = 11.4 years) were compared with those of two groups of typically developing children, one matched for chronological age, the other for orthographic level ( Mage = 8.7 years) on two handwriting measures (production of the letters of the alphabet and the child’s first name and surname). Results revealed a delay in motor skills, as well as in letter legibility, letter production duration, and the number of short pauses (i.e., lasting between 20 and 199 ms) made during letter production, in the children with dyslexia, with strong negative correlations between motor skills and the number of short pauses. Results are discussed in the context of handwriting control development in children, and perspectives are set out for practitioners.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona M. El Sheikh ◽  
Marwa A. El Missiry ◽  
Hisham A. Hatata ◽  
Walaa M. Sabry ◽  
Abdul Aala A. El Fiky ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mercedes Spencer ◽  
Richard K. Wagner

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the comprehension problems of children who have a specific reading comprehension deficit (SCD), which is characterized by poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding. The meta-analysis included 86 studies of children with SCD who were assessed in reading comprehension and oral language (vocabulary, listening comprehension, storytelling ability, and semantic and syntactic knowledge). Results indicated that children with SCD had deficits in oral language (d = −0.78, 95% confidence interval, CI [−0.89, −0.68], but these deficits were not as severe as their deficit in reading comprehension (d = −2.78, 95% CI [−3.01, −2.54]). When compared with reading comprehension age–matched normal readers, the oral language skills of the two groups were comparable (d = 0.32, 95% CI [−0.49, 1.14]), which suggests that the oral language weaknesses of children with SCD represent a developmental delay rather than developmental deviance. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document