scholarly journals Tsunami Source of the 2021 MW 8.1 Raoul Island Earthquake from DART and Tide-gauge data inversion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Romano ◽  
Aditya Riadi Gusman ◽  
William Power ◽  
Alessio Piatanesi ◽  
Manuela Volpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Tsunami Source ◽  
Tide Gauge Data ◽  
Data Inversion ◽  
Gauge Data

scholarly journals Tsunami Source of the 2021 M W 8.1 Raoul Island Earthquake from DART and Tide‐gauge data inversion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Romano ◽  
A. R. Gusman ◽  
W. Power ◽  
A. Piatanesi ◽  
M. Volpe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Tsunami Source ◽  
Tide Gauge Data ◽  
Data Inversion ◽  
Gauge Data

scholarly journals A 10-Year Comparison of Water Levels Measured with a Geodetic GPS Receiver versus a Conventional Tide Gauge

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristine M. Larson ◽  
Richard D. Ray ◽  
Simon D. P. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Tide Gauge ◽  
Signal Propagation ◽  
Propagation Delay ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
Sea Surface ◽  
Ocean Tide ◽  
Gps Receiver ◽  
Tide Gauge Data ◽  
Gauge Data

AbstractA standard geodetic GPS receiver and a conventional Aquatrak tide gauge, collocated at Friday Harbor, Washington, are used to assess the quality of 10 years of water levels estimated from GPS sea surface reflections. The GPS results are improved by accounting for (tidal) motion of the reflecting sea surface and for signal propagation delay by the troposphere. The RMS error of individual GPS water level estimates is about 12 cm. Lower water levels are measured slightly more accurately than higher water levels. Forming daily mean sea levels reduces the RMS difference with the tide gauge data to approximately 2 cm. For monthly means, the RMS difference is 1.3 cm. The GPS elevations, of course, can be automatically placed into a well-defined terrestrial reference frame. Ocean tide coefficients, determined from both the GPS and tide gauge data, are in good agreement, with absolute differences below 1 cm for all constituents save K1 and S1. The latter constituent is especially anomalous, probably owing to daily temperature-induced errors in the Aquatrak tide gauge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document