scholarly journals Demographic correlates of DSM-IV major depressive disorder among older African Americans, Black Caribbeans, and non-Hispanic Whites: results from the National Survey of American Life

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 940-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
María P. Aranda ◽  
David H. Chae ◽  
Karen D. Lincoln ◽  
Robert Joseph Taylor ◽  
Amanda Toler Woodward ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 777-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. B. MITCHELL ◽  
T. SLADE ◽  
G. ANDREWS

Background. There have been few large-scale epidemiological studies which have examined the prevalence of bipolar disorder. The authors report 12-month prevalence data for DSM-IV bipolar disorder from the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being.Method. The broad methodology of the Australian National Survey has been described previously. Ten thousand, six hundred and forty-one people participated. The 12-month prevalence of euphoric bipolar disorder (I and II) – similar to the euphoric-grandiose syndrome of Kessler and co-workers – was determined. Those so identified were compared with subjects with major depressive disorder and the rest of the sample, on rates of co-morbidity with anxiety and substance use disorders as well as demographic features and measures of disability and service utilization. Polychotomous logistic regression was used to study the relationship between the three samples and these dependent variables.Results. There was a 12-month prevalence of 0·5% for bipolar disorder. Compared with subjects with major depressive disorder, those with bipolar disorder were distinguished by a more equal gender ratio; a greater likelihood of being widowed, separated or divorced; higher rates of drug abuse or dependence; greater disability as measured by days out of role; increased rates of treatment with medicines; and higher lifetime rates of suicide attempts.Conclusions. This large national survey highlights the marked functional impairment caused by bipolar disorder, even when compared with major depressive disorder.


2012 ◽  
Vol 142 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 339-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Joseph Taylor ◽  
David H. Chae ◽  
Linda M. Chatters ◽  
Karen D. Lincoln ◽  
Edna Brown

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 957-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda M. Chatters ◽  
Kai McKeever Bullard ◽  
Robert Joseph Taylor ◽  
Amanda Toler Woodward ◽  
Harold W. Neighbors ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Markowitz ◽  
Sapana R. Patel ◽  
Ivan C. Balan ◽  
Michelle A. Bell ◽  
Carlos Blanco ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 810-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarja K. Melartin ◽  
Heikki J. Rytsälä ◽  
Ulla S. Leskelä ◽  
Paula S. Lestelä-Mielonen ◽  
T. Petteri Sokero ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
SING LEE ◽  
ADLEY TSANG ◽  
MING-YUAN ZHANG ◽  
YUE-QIN HUANG ◽  
YAN-LING HE ◽  
...  

Background. This is the first study to examine variation across cohorts in lifetime risk of DSM-IV mental disorders in metropolitan China.Method. Face-to-face household interviews of 2633 adults in Beijing and 2568 adults in Shanghai were conducted from November 2001 to February 2002 using a multi-stage household probability sampling method. The Chinese World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) was used for assessment.Results. Lifetime prevalence of any disorder was 13·2%. Alcohol abuse (4·7%), major depressive disorder (3·5%), and specific phobia (2·6%) were the most common disorders. The median age of onset was later for mood (43 years) than anxiety (17 years) and substance use (25 years) disorders. Compared to observed lifetime prevalence, the projected lifetime risk as of age 75 years increased by 106% for major depressive disorder (7·2%), and was uniformly higher for all disorders. Relative odds of any lifetime disorder were 4·7 in the most recent cohorts (ages 18–34) compared to the eldest cohorts (ages [ges ]65).Conclusions. The findings of this cross-sectional study tally with the view that rapid socioeconomic changes may bring about increasing incidence of mental disorders in China. However, prospective longitudinal studies are needed to confirm if the increase is real. Because of the huge size of the Chinese population, any increase in projected lifetime risk of mental disorders represents an enormous increase in the number of affected individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document