Liver Stiffness Measurements in Patients with Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension-The Devil Is in the Details

Hepatology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2438-2440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj Vuppalanchi ◽  
Karan Mathur ◽  
Maximillian Pyko ◽  
Niharika Samala ◽  
Naga Chalasani
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-16
Author(s):  
Soonthorn Chonprasertsuk

The noncirrhotic portal hypertension is an uncommon cause of bleeding esophagealvarices. This condition must be suspected in patients with preserved liver function. We reporta 25-year old man with SLE disease who presented with hematemesis. He had no historyor risk factors for an underlying liver condition. A huge splenomegaly was detectedby physical examination. The EGD found three large varices with red wale sign, whereas liverfunction tests were unremarkable. The noncirrhotic portal hypertension was diagnosedand confirmed by liver histopathology. Figure 1 แสดงผลการส่องกล้องทางเดินอาหารส่วนบนพบ F3 varices with red wale sign


2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 875-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. N. L. Schouten ◽  
M. E. Van der Ende ◽  
T. Koëter ◽  
H. H. M. Rossing ◽  
M. Komuta ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdurrahman Sahin ◽  
Hakan Artas ◽  
Nurettin Tunc ◽  
Mehmet Yalniz ◽  
Ibrahim Bahcecioglu

Portal hypertension (PHT) leads to several alterations on hematological indices (HI). The aim of the study is to investigate the differences in HI between cirrhotic subjects and subjects who have noncirrhotic PHT (NCPHT). This retrospective study included 328 patients with PHT (239 cirrhosis and 89 NCPHT). Demographic and clinical features, endoscopic and radiological findings, and HI including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at the time of PHT diagnosis were recorded. Severity of cirrhosis was assessed according to the Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) classification and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Hematological abnormalities were found in 92.5% of cirrhotic patients and in 55.1% of patients with NCPHT (p < 0.001). While thrombocytopenia was the most common HI in patients with cirrhosis, anemia was the most prevalent HI in NCPHT group. In the cirrhotic group, the NLR was the only parameter to differentiate each CTP group from two others. The NLR value increased with the severity of cirrhosis (2.28 ± 0.14 in CTP-A, 2.85 ± 0.19 in CTP-B and 3.26 ± 0.37 in CTP-C). The AUROC of NLR was 0.692 for differentiating compensated cirrhotic patients from decompensated. Hematological abnormalities are more prevalent and more severe in cirrhotic patients compared to patients with NCPHT. NLR may be used to assess the severity of cirrhosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Soňa Franková ◽  
Jan Šperl

Portal hypertension represents a wide spectrum of complications of chronic liver diseases and may present by ascites, oesophageal varices, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndrome or portopulmonary hypertension. Portal hypertension and its severity predicts the patient‘s prognosis: as an invasive technique, the portosystemic gradient (HPVG – hepatic venous pressure gradient) measurement by hepatic veins catheterisation has remained the gold standard of its assessment. A reliable, non-invasive method to assess the severity of portal hypertension is of paramount importance; the patients with clinically significant portal hypertension have a high risk of variceal bleeding and higher mortality. Recently, non-invasive methods enabling the assessment of liver stiffness have been introduced into clinical practice in hepatology. Not only may these methods substitute for liver biopsy, but they may also be used to assess the degree of liver fibrosis and predict the severity of portal hypertension. Nowadays, we can use the quantitative elastography (transient elastography, point shear-wave elastrography, 2D-shear-wave elastography) or magnetic resonance imaging. We may also assess the severity of portal hypertension based on the non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis (i.e. ELF test) or estimate clinically signifi cant portal hypertension using composite scores (LSPS – liver spleen stiff ness score), based on liver stiffness value, spleen diameter and platelet count. Spleen stiffness measurement is a new method that needs further prospective studies. The review describes current possibilities of the non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension and its severity.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Revathy Marimuthu Shanmugam ◽  
Vinay C ◽  
Sathya Gopalasamy ◽  
Chitra Shanmugam

BACKGROUND: Many noninvasive surrogate marker for Portal hypertension or for the presence or grade of esophageal varices were studied..Splenomegaly along with splenic congestion secondary to splenic hyperdynamic circulation is seen secondary to Portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients that can be quantified by elastography. AIM:The aim of this study was to investigate whether spleen stiffness, assessed by TE, useful tool for grading chronic liver diseases and to compare its performance in predicting the presence and size of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients. METHODOLOGY:86 patients with cirrhosis and 80 controls underwent transient elastography of liver and spleen for the assessment of liver stiffness (LSM) and spleen stiffness (SSM) . Upper GI endoscopy done in all Cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Spleen stiffness showed higher values in liver cirrhosis patients as compared with controls: 58.2 kpa vs14.8 kpa (P < 0.0001) and also found to be significantly higher in cirrhotic patients compared with varices and those without varices (69.01 vs 42.05 kpa, P < 0.0001). Liver stiffness was also found to be higher in cirrhotic patients with varices when compared to patients without varices (38.5vs 21.2 kpa). Using both liver and spleen stiffness measurement we can predicted the presence of esophageal varices correctly. CONCLUSION: Spleen stiffness can be assessed using transient elastography, higher value correlated well with liver cirrhosis and presence of esophageal varices although it couldn’t correlate with grade of Esophageal Varix. Combined assessment of spleen and liver stiffness had better prediction of presence of Esophageal Varix.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Fusaro Aguiar Oliveira ◽  
Anna Carolina Faria Moreira Gomes Tavares ◽  
Lucas Moyses Carvalho de Oliveira ◽  
Matheus Fonseca Cardoso ◽  
Ana Paula Bernardes Real

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document