scholarly journals Duration of oxaliplatin‐based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage III or high‐risk Stage II resected colon cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (9) ◽  
pp. 2652-2654
Author(s):  
Roberto Moretto ◽  
Alfredo Falcone ◽  
Chiara Cremolini
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii

Clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 867-867
Author(s):  
Shusuke Yagi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Diverting Ileostomy ◽  
Grade 3

867 Background: CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard care option for stage III and high risk stage II colorectal cancer(CRC). And then chemotherapy induced diarrhea (CID) is known as one of the dose-limiting toxicities for CAPOX. Although diverting ileostomy is useful for preventing serious complications of high risk anastomosis, it is well recognized that high ileostomy output is hard to manage. Furthermore, the effect of diverting ileostomy on CID of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we addressed the clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC. Methods: Patients who diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and stage II or III rectal cancer after curative surgery and received CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy during 2011- 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated the relationship between diverting ileostomy and dose intensity, toxicities and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 112 patients (median age 60 years, 52% male, 69% colon cancer, 63% stage III, median follow-up 47 months) were enrolled in this study. Of 112 patients, 100 patients were received chemotherapy without ileostomy (non-ileostomy group: NIG) and 12 patients were received chemotherapy with ileostomy (ileostomy group: IG). 112 Patients received 870 chemotherapy cycles. All treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events were documented in 39% of patients in NIG and 33% of patients in IG (P = 0.77). Grade 3/4 of CID occurred in 8% of patients in NIG and 8% of patients in IG (P = 1). Grade 3/4 of neutropenia were recognized in 21% of patients in NIG and 17% of patients in IG (P = 1). Average relative dose intensity (RDI) in NIG were 75.7% and 85.8% for capecitabine and oxaliplatin, respectively. Average RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in IG were 76.1% and 82.7%, respectively. Significant difference of RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were not shown in comparison between NIG and IG (P = 0.93, P = 0.63). The 3-year DFS rate was 85.0% in NIG and 75.0% in IG. The HR for DFS for NIG compared to IG was 1.709 (95% CI, 0.49 to 5.95; P = 0.40). Conclusions: The presence of diverting ileostomy does not affect RDI of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Evaluating the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in stage II and III colon cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 685-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorotea Mutabdzic ◽  
Shalana BL O'Brien ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Karthik Devarajan ◽  
Sanjay S. Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymphovascular Invasion ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Node Involvement

685 Background: Presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is known to be a predictor of lymph node involvement in colon adenocarcinoma (CA). Lymph node involvement is associated with poorer prognosis necessitating adjuvant therapy. While some studies have suggested that LVI is a predictor of worse overall survival in early stage colon cancer, the significance of LVI on prognosis has not been tested in a comprehensive North American data set. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CA with LVI data available and those who received predefined standard of care treatment were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2011 to 2015. The relationship between LVI and overall survival was tested using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after adjusting for relevant clinical and demographic variables. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported along with median overall survival (OS) where available. Results: The dataset included 93,070 patients with stage II and 66,701 patients with stage III CA. The proportion of patients with LVI was 13% in stage II and 47% in stage III CA. After adjusting for age, sex, gender, race, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, T, and N stage, LVI was associated with worse OS in stage II, HR 1.2 (1.15-1.25, p < 0.001), and in stage III, HR 1.25 (1.21-1.30, p < 0.001), CA. Median OS was 6.51 years with LVI versus. 6.85 years without LVI in stage II compared with 6.57 years with LVI versus not reached without LVI in stage III CA. Of the stage II patients with LVI, 20% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and median OS was 6.91 years for those who did versus 6.07 years for those who did not receive CT. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LVI is an important predictor of OS in stage II and III CA. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy improves OS in advanced CA but there remains uncertainty as to the benefit in stage II. Despite this uncertainty, guidelines suggest consideration of adjuvant CT in patients with high-risk stage II disease. Our data support the recommendation that LVI be considered a high-risk feature in stage II disease. Further studies are necessary to examine whether the type or duration of CT should differ for patients with CA and LVI.

The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy dose intensity on overall survival in resected colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
Suganija Lakkunarajah ◽  
Daniel Adam Breadner ◽  
Hanbo Zhang ◽  
Jennifer L. Spratlin ◽  
Karen E. Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
N2 Disease

248 Background: Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in developed countries. The benefit of using fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, such as FOLFOX (fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, oxaliplatin) and CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) is well established. The optimal dose intensity (DI) under which overall survival (OS) is inferior is not established. Methods: Patients (pts) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2011 for resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from four academic cancer centres in Canada were retrospectively analysed. Patients that received CAPOX and FOLFOX were examined for the relationship between DI and OS. Results: A total of 625 pts with resected high risk stage II or stage III CC that received adjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. The median age was 63. Pts with T4 and N2 disease comprised 35.4% and 29.9% of pts, respectively. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. There was available survival data for 319 pts. The median oxaliplatin DI was 70%. The frequency of pts reaching an oxaliplatin DI of > 80% was 43%, while 76.6% of pts had a dose intensity of > 80% for their FU component. An oxaliplatin DI of > 80% was associated with a significant improvement in survival, HR = 0.42 (95%CI 0.21 – 0.81, p < 0.01). Achieving a DI of > 80% for capecitabine or 5-FU did not improve OS. Other factors associated with inferior OS included T4 (HR = 3.5, p = 0.03) and N2 (HR = 5.27, p = 0.0005) subgroups. The improvement in OS was not significant when restricting the analysis to pts with non-T4 and non-N2 disease (n = 144), HR = 0.16 (0.02 – 1.26; p = 0.08). Conclusions: Oxaliplatin DI of > 80% is associated with improved OS in patients receiving chemotherapy for high risk stage II and stage III CC.

scholarly journals Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stages II and III colon cancer after complete resection: a clinical practice guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.M. Meyers ◽  
R. Cosby ◽  
F. Quereshy ◽  
D. Jonker
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Practice Guideline ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Background Updated practice guidelines on adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected colon cancer are lacking. In 2008, Cancer Care Ontario’s Program in Evidence-Based Care developed a guideline on adjuvant therapy for stages ii and iii colon cancer. With newer regimens being assessed in this patient population and older agents being either abandoned because of non-effectiveness or replaced by agents that are more efficacious, a full update of the original guideline was undertaken.Methods Literature searches (January 1987 to August 2015) of medline, embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted; in addition, abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress were reviewed (the latter for January 2007 to August 2015). A practice guideline was drafted that was then scrutinized by internal and external reviewers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline.Results Twenty-six unique reports of eighteen randomized controlled trials and thirteen unique reports of twelve meta-analyses or pooled analyses were included in the evidence base. The 5 recommendations developed included 3 for stage ii colon cancer and 2 for stage iii colon cancer.Conclusions Patients with completely resected stage iii colon cancer should be offered adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5fu)–based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (based on definitive data for improvements in survival and disease-free survival). Patients with resected stage ii colon cancer without “high-risk” features should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with “high-risk” features, 5fu-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin should be offered, although no clinical trials have been conducted to conclusively demonstrate the same benefits seen in stage iii colon cancer.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Taiwo Adesoye ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Amanda Cuddy ◽  
Amanda B. Francescatti ◽  
Jessica R. Schumacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
The Impact

533 Background: Although clinical guidelines recommend consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer, the impact on recurrence risk and cancer related survival is unclear. Furthermore, among Medicare patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. We examine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk and overall survival in a diverse cohort. Methods: 6,095 patients who underwent surgery for stage II-III colon cancer (2006-2007) were randomly selected from facilities reporting to the National Cancer Data Base for additional abstraction of tumor information, 5 year recurrence and survival. Death or second cancer within 6 months were excluded. Patients were classified as high or low risk using standard pathologic factors. Multivariate Cox regression with propensity score weighting was performed to compare recurrence risk and overall survival. Results: Of 3,423 patients with stage II colon cancer, 26.9% (n = 883) received chemotherapy compared to 76.2% (n = 1,839) of stage III patients. Among stage II patients, 47.8% (n = 1,636) had at least one high risk feature and 30.8% (n = 481) of these received chemotherapy. Five year recurrence rate in stage II patients was 13% (n = 392), greater in high risk compared to non-high risk patients (13.3% vs 9.3% p < 0.0001) and 24.4% (n = 874) in stage III patients. Chemotherapy did not improve recurrence risk in stage II patients regardless of risk status (High risk: hazard ratio [HR] 1.37; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.97; Non-high risk: HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.91 - 2.11). Chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence risk in stage III patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63 - 0.96). However, chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in both high (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.51 - 0.92) and non-high risk stage II patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 - 1.04), and also in stage III patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.54). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a lower recurrence rate among stage II colon cancer patients. The observed survival benefit associated with chemotherapy is likely attributable to non-oncologic factors such as patient selection. Decision-making regarding chemotherapy use in this cohort should be carefully approached.

Duration of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer with deficient DNA mismatch repair.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4075-4075
Author(s):  
Zehua Wu ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Yanhong Deng
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Dna Mismatch Repair ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

4075 Background: In the IDEA collaboration, noninferiority was not confirmed for 3 months versus 6 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer (CC). Patients with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) have a good prognosis, but for whom, whether limiting the duration of adjuvant therapy will compromise oncologic outcomes remains undefined. We evaluated the impact of 3 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone in comparison with 6 months of FOLFOX on disease-free survival (DFS) in dMMR CC patients. Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent curative surgical resection for high-risk stage II or III dMMR CC between May, 2011 and July, 2019. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Cox models, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 242 dMMR CC patients were included (43.4% high-risk stage II, 56.6% stage III). The patients received 6 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 66; median cycles [rang] = 12 [10-12]), 3 months of FOLFOX (n = 87; median cycles [rang] = 6 [4-8]), or surgery alone (n = 89). Three groups were generally well balanced, although more patients with stage III were in the 6-month therapy group (74.2%), compared with the 3-month therapy group (57.5%) and the surgery alone group (42.7%). As compared with 6 months of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy in the overall population, 3 months therapy reduced DFS in multivariable analysis (HR, 2.78; 95CI, 1.18 to 6.47; P = 0.02), similar to surgery alone (HR, 2.30; 95CI, 0.99 to 5.38; P = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, a therapy duration of 6 months was statistically superior to a duration of 3 months only in the patients with stage III, with a 3-year rate of DFS of 86.2% versus 70.8% (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.14 to 8.19; P = 0.026). Conclusions: This study supports the 6-month duration of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III dMMR CC.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and stage III colon cancer—What is happening in routine practice?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15046-e15046
Author(s):  
S. Ananda ◽  
S. Kosmider ◽  
L. Lim ◽  
F. Barnett ◽  
J. Desai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Practice Methods

e15046 Background: Randomised studies have defined adjuvant chemotherapy as standard treatment for stage III colon cancer (SIIICC), with multiple options available. For stage II (SII) disease, the selection of patients for adjuvant treatment remains controversial. There remains limited data on clinician decision making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in routine clinical practice. Methods: A review of patients treated with SII & IIICC at 4 hospitals, utilising data from BioGrid Australia, where clinician choice and rationale were prospectively documented. Results: 372 patients (37%) with SII and 307 (30%) with SIIICC were identified from 1015 CC patients treated from January 2003 till November 2008. Median age was 68 years, 51% were male; 49% female. 66 (25%) of patients with SIIICC were not offered chemotherapy, predominantly due to advanced age or co-morbidity. Since oxaliplatin and capecitabine became widely available in 2005, 66% of treated patients have received oxaliplatin based therapy, 15% bolus 5-FU alone and 19% capecitabine. For SII disease, overall 81 (26%) pts received adjuvant chemotherapy. Age was the dominant influence on treatment choice with 41% aged 70 (p<0.001) receiving treatment. Patients with high risk features were also more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. (p= 0.006 for those with lymphovascular invasion and p= 0.0068 for those with T4 tumours). Dose reductions and completion rates were similar for SII and III disease, and for older and younger patients. Conclusions: Over 25% of patients with SIIICC do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy in routine practice, with physicians basing non-treatment recommendations predominantly on patient age and co-morbidity. Where treatment is used, oxaliplatin-based therapy is the dominant regimen, except in older patients. In SIICC, adjuvant chemotherapy is used in one in four patients, more frequently in younger patients and those with high risk features. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Duration of FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II and Stage III Colon Cancer With Deficient Mismatch Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Zehua Wu ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundWe evaluated the impact of 3 months of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone in comparison with 6 months of mFOLFOX6 on disease-free survival (DFS) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colon cancer (CC) patients.MethodsThis retrospective study identified a cohort of patients with high-risk stage II and III dMMR CC who underwent curative surgery between May 2011 and July 2019. DFS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce imbalance in baseline characteristics.ResultsA total of 242 dMMR CC patients were identified; 66 patients received 6 months of mFOLFOX6, 87 patients received 3 months of mFOLFOX6, and 89 patients were treated with surgery alone. The 3-year DFS rate was 72.8% in 3-month therapy group and 86.1% in 6-month therapy group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.78 (95CI%, 1.18 to 6.47; P= 0.019). The difference in DFS between surgery alone group and 6-month therapy group was also observed but was nonsignificant (HR= 2.30, 95%CI, 0.99 to 5.38; P=0.054). The benefit of 6-month therapy in DFS compared with 3-month therapy group was pronounced for patients with stage III (HR=2.81, 95%CI, 1.03 to 7.67; P=0.044) but not for high-risk stage II patients. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed a DFS benefit in the 6-month therapy group.ConclusionThis study suggested that a 6-month duration of mFOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy in dMMR CC patients may be associated with improved DFS compared with 3-month therapy, particularly in patients with stage III. The observational nature of the study implies caution should be taken in the interpretation of these results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document