The impact of bank ownership on lending behavior: Evidence from the 2008–2009 financial crisis

Author(s):  
Zamon Haldarov ◽  
Dimitrios Asteriou ◽  
Emmanouil Trachanas
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 562-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doriana Cucinelli

Purpose This study aims to analyze bank lending behavior before and during the most recent financial crisis. Banks are more willing to grant loans during economic expansion. However, this behavior can result in reduced portfolio asset quality. The analysis tries to facilitate understanding of whether this relationship is always true. A second aim of the study is to highlight whether the impact of credit risk on bank lending behavior during a financial crisis is greater for banks that grew faster during the pre-crisis period than for other banks. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on a sample of banks in Italy, an example of a country undergoing a credit crunch without a lending bubble burst. The methodology is based on a panel regression and author uses different models to test his hypothesis: an ordinary least squares, a fixed effect, a least absolute regression and a Generalized Method of Momentum (GMM). This allows to mitigate some of the endogeneity problems. Findings The essay shows that effectively, most of the banks that grew faster during a pre-crisis period show a higher growth of non-performing loans and a greater reduction in lending activity during a financial crisis. However, 34 per cent of banks that grew faster during a pre-crisis period have a low growth of non-performing loans in the subsequent years. Finally, the results suggest that credit risk negatively affects bank lending behavior, but a higher impact relative to fast banks with respect to other banks cannot be emphasized. Practical implications Findings have some policy implications. First, given the adverse effect of the increase of non-performing loans (NPLs) on the bank’s lending activity and on the broad economy in general, there is merit to strengthen supervision to prevent a further increase and accumulation of NPLs in the bank’s credit portfolio. In addition, the supervisors could require that banks take always high credit standard when extend credit, both during positive economic cycle and during period of contraction. The using of higher credit standard could be helpful in the reduction of the pro-cyclicality of bank’s lending behavior and credit risk. Furthermore, the fact that high level of NPLs continues to impact on the bank’s lending activity and that this activity is very important for the economic recovery underlines that banks should clean-up their credit portfolios as soon as possible. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature in various ways. The study analyzes the cyclical effect of credit growth, i.e. banks increase their bank lending behavior during good times, which leads to an increase in bad loans and a high credit risk in their portfolio. These cyclical effects are not knowingly studied together, but the literature usually analyzes the single steps of the cycle. Second, studying listed and unlisted banks allows to have a more representative sample and to analyze better the real bank lending activity considering both commercial than cooperative banks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-29
Author(s):  
Dorothea Schäfer

Die Coronakrise ist die erste globale Pandemie seit mehr als 100 Jahren. In dieser Hinsicht ist die Coronakrise einzigartig und damit wahrhaft „different“. Aber ist sie auch „einzigartig“ wenn die Reaktion der Finanzinstitute auf die Krise in den Blick genommen wird? Vor dem Hintergrund des mehrgliedrigen Bankensystems in Deutschland untersucht der Beitrag, ob in der Coronakrise das Kreditgewerbe bei der Finanzierung der Realwirtschaft ähnlich agiert, als in vorangegangenen Krisen. Zunächst prüfen wir, wie die Kreditquote, also der Anteil der Kredite an der Bankbilanzsumme, auf die drei großen Krisen dieses Jahrhunderts, Dotcom-Krise, Finanzkrise und Coronakrise, reagiert hat. Grundlage dazu ist ein Paneldatensatz mit den Bankengruppen als Beobachtungseinheit. Im zweiten Schritt vergleichen wir die Entwicklung der Kreditbestände und Marktanteile der Bankengruppen in Coronakrise und Finanzkrise. Unsere Befunde zeigen, dass der Spruch „This time is different“ für das deutsche Bankwesen in der Coronakrise nicht falsch ist. Die empirische Schätzung ergibt, dass kapitalschwächere Bankengruppen in der Finanzkrise die Kreditquote zwar signifikant abgesenkt, diese aber in der Coronakrise signifikant erhöht haben. Der Vergleich der Kreditbestände zeigt für die Banken insgesamt und für einzelne Bankengruppen in der Coronakrise eine deutlich expansivere Kreditvergabe als in der Finanzkrise. The Corona crisis is the first global pandemic in more than 100 years. In this respect, the Corona crisis is unique and therefore truly “different”. But is it also “unique” when the response of financial institutions to the crisis is considered? Against the backdrop of the German banking system the work examines whether in the Corona crisis the banking industry has shown a similar reluctance to finance the real economy as in previous economic crises. Based on a panel data set with the banking groups as an observation unit, we explore the impact of dotcom, financial and corona crisis on the share of loans in the balance sheet of banking groups. Furthermore, we compare lending behavior and the market share trends of the individual banking groups in the financial crisis and the corona crisis. As a result, it can be said that the saying “This time is different” is an appropriate description for the German banking system in the Corona crisis. The empirical estimate shows that capital-weaker banking groups significantly reduced the share of loans in total assets during the financial crisis but significantly increased them during the corona crisis. A direct comparison of the development of loan portfolios shows an opposite trend in the Corona crisis for the banks as a whole, and also for individual banking groups than in the financial crisis.


2015 ◽  
pp. 89-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy Nguyen Thu ◽  
Giang Dao Thi Thu ◽  
Hoang Truong Huy

This paper examines the abnormal returns in merger withdrawals in Australia, especially distinguishing the market response between private and public targets. We also study the determinants of those abnormal returns, including the method of payment and the impact of financial crisis periods. Using the event study method, we document that in the Australian context, the announced withdrawal of mergers involving private targets creates significantly negative valuation effects in comparison with the valuation effects in withdrawal of mergers involving public targets. We also find that a financial crisis period strongly affects abnormal returns of merger withdrawals. However, the method of payment does not have any impact on the abnormal returns.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (01-02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Ur Rehman ◽  
Yasir Arafat Elahi ◽  
Sushma .

India has recently emerged as a major political and economic power in the world. The financial crisis that engulfed the world in 2008 needed developing countries like India to lead the rescue and recovery, instead of G7 westerns countries who dealt with such crisis in the past. Recently, discussions and negotiations are going amongst G20 countries regarding a new global financial architecture (G-20 Summit, 2008). The outcome will affect the relevant industries in India and hence it is a public interest issue for the actuarial profession in the country. Increased and more intrusive and costly regulations and red tapes are likely to be a part of the new deal (Economic Survey 2009-10). The objective of this paper is to study the perception of higher level authorities in Insurance sector regarding the role of regulator in minimizing the impact of global financial crisis. The primary data has been collected from 200 authorities in insurance industry. The data has been analyzed with statistical tools like MS-Excel. On the basis of the findings, various measures and policy recommendations for insurers have been suggested to minimize the impact of crisis.


Author(s):  
Peter Dietsch

Monetary policy, and the response it elicits from financial markets, raises normative questions. This chapter, building on an introductory section on the objectives and instruments of monetary policy, analyzes two such questions. First, it assesses the impact of monetary policy on inequality and argues that the unconventional policies adopted in the wake of the financial crisis exacerbate inequalities in income and wealth. Depending on the theory of justice one holds, this impact is problematic. Should monetary policy be sensitive to inequalities and, if so, how? Second, the chapter argues that the leverage that financial markets have today over the monetary policy agenda undermines democratic legitimacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document