market response
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

500
(FIVE YEARS 95)

H-INDEX

38
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Trimawarningsih Saravia Jegarut ◽  
Caecilia Wahyu Estining Rahayu ◽  
Ima Kristina Yulita

This research aims to examine capital market response to the 2019-2024 Indonesia Onward Cabinet System announced by President Jokowi. This event study research used market estimation model to estimate the expected return with an estimated period of 100 days and window period of seven days. There were 90 companies that are the member of Kompas Index 100 as the sample used in this research. T-test was used to analyze the data. The result shows that the announcement System of Indonesia Onward Cabinet 2019-2024 was responded positively and significantly by capital market. The result supports signaling theory in which the announcement of the 2019-2024 Indonesia Onward Cabinet System gave positive signal (influence) on capital market.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Carrizosa ◽  
Richard A. Cazier

Prior literature documents a negative stock price reaction to initial securities lawsuit filings, on average. Securities litigation produces a host of publicly accessible court documents, however, and prior research provides no evidence regarding whether or how the market prices information generated by the litigation process. We shed light on the information content of federal court filings by examining the market response to a large sample of initial plaintiff complaints and subsequent docket events. We find the market response to the initial lawsuit filing varies significantly with information about governance and control problems signaled by details of the plaintiff’s complaint. We also find a significant market response to subsequent court filings that increases with measures of litigation severity and decreases as the litigation progresses over time. Overall, our results highlight the role of federally accessible court filings in facilitating the market’s pricing of defendant firms.


ETIKONOMI ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-442
Author(s):  
Kavita Chavali ◽  
Hazem Al Samman ◽  
Syed Jamil

The paper aims to evaluate the reaction of stock markets in BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study uses ARCH and GARCH models that use daily stock prices from January 1, 2020, to September 2, 2020. The financial market response was analyzed in two phases. The first phase analyses the financial markets' response within 30 to 60 days from the first day of confirmed cases of COVID-19. The second phase analyses the financial market response post 30 to 60 days of initial confirmed cases. The study results conclude that the share prices decreased, but in the second phase, the markets responded positively. Our results conclude that governmental support played an important role in mitigating the repercussions of the COVID-19 outbreak on stock markets in BRICS countries.JEL Classification: E44, G15, G10How to Cite:Chavali, K., Al Samman, H., & Jamil, S. A. (2021). How Did The Financial Markets Respond to The Covid-19 Pandemic? Empirical Evidence from BRICS Countries. Etikonomi, 20(2), xx– xx. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i2.20339.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Aldridge ◽  
Laura Garius ◽  
Jack Spicer ◽  
Magdalena Harris ◽  
Karenza Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-437
Author(s):  
Kyung Hee Park

This study analyzed the impact of COVID-19, which, in 2020, globally increased uncertainty about the stock repurchase of South Korean listed companies. The results suggest that the market reaction to stock repurchases during the COVID-19 period was significantly subdued. In particular, the market reaction to KOSPI companies, on stock repurchase, was positive, while it was negative in the case of KOSDAQ companies. It has also been reported that the market ranks lower on the reliability of the signal after the onset of COVID-19. This means that if a company discloses a stock repurchase in a situation where the value of the market as a whole has declined, it cannot be accepted as an undervalued signal. Furthermore, it was revealed that the market responded more positively to the announcement of repurchases by companies that had actively managed shareholder wealth by repeatedly making stock repurchases before COVID-19. These results suggest that companies should always be aware of this, as the market response to stock repurchases in market shockers such as COVID-19 is weaker. Additionally, managers can manage their stock prices more effectively through stock repurchases during market shockers if they consistently manage their stock prices through stock repurchases when companies are undervalued.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document