1.2.1 Combating Uncertainty in the Workflow of Systems Engineering Projects

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 368-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Papke ◽  
Rick Dove
Author(s):  
Gábor Bergmann

AbstractStudying large-scale collaborative systems engineering projects across teams with differing intellectual property clearances, or healthcare solutions where sensitive patient data needs to be partially shared, or similar multi-user information systems over databases, all boils down to a common mathematical framework. Updateable views (lenses) and more generally bidirectional transformations are abstractions to study the challenge of exchanging information between participants with different read access privileges. The view provided to each participant must be different due to access control or other limitations, yet also consistent in a certain sense, to enable collaboration towards common goals. A collaboration system must apply bidirectional synchronization to ensure that after a participant modifies their view, the views of other participants are updated so that they are consistent again. While bidirectional transformations (synchronizations) have been extensively studied, there are new challenges that are unique to the multidirectional case. If complex consistency constraints have to be maintained, synchronizations that work fine in isolation may not compose well. We demonstrate and characterize a failure mode of the emergent behaviour, where a consistency restoration mechanism undoes the work of other participants. On the other end of the spectrum, we study the case where synchronizations work especially well together: we characterize very well-behaved multidirectional transformations, a non-trivial generalization from the bidirectional case. For the former challenge, we introduce a novel concept of controllability, while for the latter one, we propose a novel formal notion of faithful decomposition. Additionally, the paper proposes several novel properties of multidirectional transformations.


2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 132-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Stupples

As our world becomes ever more complex, engineering solutions to meet our needs become more difficult to realise. These solutions are born through projects that, because of this complexity, have been increasingly difficult to deliver on time and to budget. There is not a week goes by without reports of yet another project disaster, or another embarrassment for government! What is going wrong? Our ability to design and construct complex engineering solutions is improving, mainly through the formal application of systems engineering, but there is another entity in play that is not benefiting from the same degree of attention — the delivery mechanism or, as it is more commonly termed the “project”. This project can be as complex as the engineering solution, with behaviour that is extremely dynamic in nature. The application of system dynamics modelling is currently the only way by which this behaviour can be understood and ultimately controlled. System dynamics may therefore be the missing ingredient for successful projects.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Baron ◽  
Philippe Esteban ◽  
Rui Xue ◽  
Daniel Esteve ◽  
Michel Malbert

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Baron ◽  
Philippe Esteban ◽  
Rui Xue ◽  
Daniel Esteve ◽  
Michel Malbert

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Bertoni

Students engaged in systems engineering education typically lack experience and understanding of the multidisciplinary complexity of systems engineering projects. Consequently, students struggle to understand the value, rationale, and usefulness of established systems engineering methods, often perceiving them as banal or trivial. The paper presents a learning activity based on a three-stage reverse engineering role-play developed to increase students’ awareness of the importance of correctly using systems engineering methods. The activity was developed and integrated in the Systems Engineering course given at Blekinge Institute of Technology. Its effectiveness was analyzed through semistructured self-reflection reports along with two editions of the course. The results showed the development of students’ understanding of how to use systems engineering methods. In particular, the students realized the need to deliver detailed and easy-to-read models to the decision makers. This result was in line with the achievement of some of the intended learning outcomes of the course.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 433-448
Author(s):  
Heidi Ann Hahn ◽  
Nick Lombardo ◽  
Ann Hodges ◽  
Mitchell Kerman ◽  
Frédéric Autran

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 384-405
Author(s):  
Robert F. Bordley ◽  
Jeffrey M. Keisler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document