scholarly journals Development and evaluation of armored RNA ‐based standards for quantification of BCR ‐ ABL 1 p210/p190 fusion gene transcripts

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Fu ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Qisheng Wu ◽  
Jiawei Zhang ◽  
Lihua Bao ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. M. MELO ◽  
J. F. VASCONCELLOS ◽  
F. C. B. C. MELO ◽  
C. G. F. MACHADO ◽  
T. M. S. LACERDA ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2404-2404
Author(s):  
Grigory Tsaur ◽  
Alexander Popov ◽  
Tatyana Riger ◽  
Alexander Solodovnikov ◽  
Tatyana Nasedkina ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is powerful tool for prediction of treatment outcome in leukemia patients of various age groups, including infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In the vast majority of cases only bone marrow (BM) samples are used for MRD detection. Objective. To estimate prognostic significance of MRD in peripheral blood (PB) and BM by qualitative detection of different MLL fusion gene transcripts in infant ALL enrolled into MLL-Baby protocol. Methods. Fifty three infants (20 boys and 33 girls) with median age of 5.3 months (range 0.03-11.80) and defined MLL rearrangements were included in the current study. Among them there were 25 patients (47.2%) carrying MLL-AFF1 fusion gene transcripts, 10 (18.9%) MLL-MLLT3-positive cases, 9 (17.0%) MLL-MLLT1-positive cases, 5 (9.4%) MLL-MLLT10-positive cases and 4 (7.5%) MLL-EPS15-positive ones. MRD evaluation was performed by detection of MLL fusion gene transcripts in BM and PB samples using real-time PCR and nested RT-PCR with sensitivity non-less than 1E-04. MRD-negativity was defined as absence of fusion gene transcripts in both assays. Median of follow-up period in the observed group was 5.2 years. Time points (TP) for MRD assessment were as follows: day 15 of remission induction (TP1), at the end of remission induction (TP2), after each course of ATRA administration (TP3-TP7). Informed consent was obtained in all cases. Results. We estimated 142 paired BM/PB samples. 77 samples were double positive, 43 were double negative Thus concordance between MRD results in BM and PB samples achieved 84.5%. Concordance varied between different TPs of MLL-Baby protocol from 79.0% to 100%. The highest concordance rate was at TP4 and TP7 (92.3% and 100%, respectively). Interestingly, all discrepant results (22 samples 15.5%) were BM-positive/PB-negative. Median level of ABL gene, used for normalization, was similar in BM and PB samples (4.85E+04 vs 4.95E+04, respectively, p=0.760). Evaluation of prognostic significance of MRD in BM in TP1-TP7 revealed that TP4 was the earliest TP when discriminative data between MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients were obtained. MRD-positivity at TP4 in BM led to unfavorable outcome. Event-free survival was significantly lower in MRD-positive group (n=22) in comparison to MRD-negative one (n=31) (0.06±0.06 vs 0.70±0.09 p=0.0001), while cumulative incidence of relapse in MRD-positive patients was remarkably higher (0.92±0.01 vs 0.29±0.08, p<0.0001). MRD-positivity at this TP in BM was the only significant factor in the diagnostic model where initial risk factors (age at diagnosis, initial WBC count, immunophenotype, CNS disease, presence of MLL-AF4) were combined to response criteria (number of blast cells at day 8 of dexamethasone prophase and MRD in BM at TP4) (Table). The only TP when MRD data obtained from PB samples had prognostic value was TP6. In this TP cumulative incidence of relapse in MRD-positive patients was significantly higher in comparison to MRD-negative ones (0.88±0.11 vs 0.25±0.13, respectively, p=0.003). However these data did not bring any extra advantages as compared to TP4 in BM. Conclusions. Despite high qualitative concordance rate between MRD detection in BM and PB samples we could not show prognostic value of MRD monitoring in PB by fusion gene transcripts. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that MRD-positivity at TP4 in BM was the only significant and independent prognostic factor of unfavorable outcome in the observed group of patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 561-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiyuki Hakozaki ◽  
Hiroshi Hojo ◽  
Takahiro Tajino ◽  
Hitoshi Yamada ◽  
Atsushi Kikuta ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 938-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen E White ◽  
John Hedges ◽  
Israel Bendit ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Dolors Colomer ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Current guidelines for managing Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia include monitoring the expression of the BCR-ABL1 (breakpoint cluster region/c-abl oncogene 1, non-receptor tyrosine kinase) fusion gene by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). Our goal was to establish and validate reference panels to mitigate the interlaboratory imprecision of quantitative BCR-ABL1 measurements and to facilitate global standardization on the international scale (IS). METHODS Four-level secondary reference panels were manufactured under controlled and validated processes with synthetic Armored RNA Quant molecules (Asuragen) calibrated to reference standards from the WHO and the NIST. Performance was evaluated in IS reference laboratories and with non–IS-standardized RT-qPCR methods. RESULTS For most methods, percent ratios for BCR-ABL1 e13a2 and e14a2 relative to ABL1 or BCR were robust at 4 different levels and linear over 3 logarithms, from 10% to 0.01% on the IS. The intraassay and interassay imprecision was &lt;2-fold overall. Performance was stable across 3 consecutive lots, in multiple laboratories, and over a period of 18 months to date. International field trials demonstrated the commutability of the reagents and their accurate alignment to the IS within the intra- and interlaboratory imprecision of IS-standardized methods. CONCLUSIONS The synthetic calibrator panels are robust, reproducibly manufactured, analytically calibrated to the WHO primary standards, and compatible with most BCR-ABL1 RT-qPCR assay designs. The broad availability of secondary reference reagents will further facilitate interlaboratory comparative studies and independent quality assessment programs, which are of paramount importance for worldwide standardization of BCR-ABL1 monitoring results and the optimization of current and new therapeutic approaches for chronic myeloid leukemia.


2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (20) ◽  
pp. 8516-8524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianghua Wang ◽  
Yi Cai ◽  
Wendong Yu ◽  
Chengxi Ren ◽  
David M. Spencer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiba Ranjan Mishra ◽  
Leena Rawal ◽  
Moneeb A. K. Othman ◽  
Atul Thatai ◽  
Aditi Sarkar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22) is one of the most frequent chromosomal abnormalities associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) sub type M2. About 3–5 % of cases with additional chromosomal abnormalities, including structural and numerical ones, are reported to include a complex translocation t(8;21;N). Case presentation Here we report a chromosome rearrangement observed in a 19 years-old female diagnosed with AML-M2. When subjected to (molecular) cytogenetic analyses a complex three-way translocation involving chromosomes 8, 17 and 21 was detected, forming not a t(8;21;17) as one would expect. Real time-polymerase chain reaction analysis using 6 AML specific markers showed the presence of RUNX1/RUNX1T1 fusion gene transcripts identical to those found in classical translocation t(8;21) coupled with presence of FLT3-ITD mutation identified by fragment analysis. Conclusions The present case highlights importance of complex rearrangements rarely encountered in AML, suggesting that all involved regions harbor critical candidate genes regulating the pathogenesis of AML, leading to novel as well as well-known leukemia associated chromosomal aberrations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document