scholarly journals Antimicrobial stewardship without infectious disease physician

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junpei Komagamine
Author(s):  
Pinyo Rattanaumpawan ◽  
Surangkana Samanloh ◽  
Visanu Thamlikitkul

Abstract A nationwide survey was conducted in 399 acute-care hospitals in Thailand. Most had a designated antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), but <20% had an infectious disease physician on the team. The most frequently cited challenges in ASP implementation were the increased workload, followed by a lack of antimicrobial stewardship knowledge and a lack of hospital administrator concern.


2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 531-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad R. Laible ◽  
Jawad Nazir ◽  
Aris P. Assimacopoulos ◽  
Jennifer Schut

Antimicrobial stewardship is an important process proven to combat antimicrobial resistance, improve patient outcomes, and reduce costs. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) have provided guidelines for the provision of antimicrobial stewardship. According to these recommendations, antimicrobial stewardship teams should be multidisciplinary in nature, with core members consisting of an infectious disease physician and an infectious disease–trained clinical pharmacist. Due to limited resources, our institution chose to implement a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship service on 1 medical/surgical ward, with the existing clinical pharmacist and 3 infectious disease physicians as core members. This clinical pharmacist was not trained in infectious disease specialty, and stewardship activities were only one part of his daily activities. Pharmacy residents and students were extensively utilized to assist in the stewardship process. Approximately two thirds of stewardship recommendations were accepted using primarily a prospective audit and feedback approach.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Murakami ◽  
Hirokazu Komatsu ◽  
Masahide Sugiyama ◽  
Yuhei Ichikawa ◽  
Kyoko Ide ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S378-S379
Author(s):  
Jeanne Brady PharmD ◽  
Mahendra Poudel

Abstract Background The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is one of the basis for the control of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR), optimization of antibiotic use, minimization of adverse events, and reduction of unnecessary costs. We demonstrate the design, development, and participation in ASP program following CDC and Prevention Core Elements strategies.1,3,4 The objective is to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacists working in conjunction with infectious disease (ID) physician on tracking and documenting antibacterial utilization in per patient-days, pharmacist clinical interventions, prescriber practices, and antibiotic purchases. Methods We conducted a multidisciplinary-team project of pharmacist-led prospective-audit-with-feedback ASP from 2015 to 2018. The ID physician and clinical pharmacist conducted patient care rounds twice weekly to make recommendations that include de-escalation, intensification of treatment, alternative therapy, dose optimization, order clarification, stop date/duration, additional monitoring, education, restriction enforcement, consult, IV to PO conversion, rejection of recommendation, and total monitored interventions requiring no changes. Results Pharmacist tracked between 150 and 200 interventions monthly through the EMR system, reflecting both self-stewardship and during rounds with ID physician. Figures 2–8: Charts display the number of patient-days of therapy per 1,000 days at risk and yearly SVMH Antibacterial Utilization Rates compared nationally to other Teaching and Nonteaching hospitals.5 Below each graph exhibits yearly Drug Spend per patient-days of Therapy.6 Conclusion Overall, the antibiotic utilization rates decreased over 4 years, particularly with aztreonam, meropenem, and levofloxacin.The formalization of an antimicrobial stewardship partnership between ID physician and pharmacy team led to increases in pharmacist-recommended interventions, streamlining of antimicrobial therapy, as well as decreases in antimicrobial purchasing costs. Proactively working in conjunction with hospitalists allows the pharmacists to play a critical role in sustaining a robust ASP service at our community hospital. The ASP at SVMH can serve as a model for other community hospitals with similar resources. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s118-s118
Author(s):  
Mary T. Catanzaro

Background: The CDC and The Joint Commission have called for an interdisciplinary approach to antibiotic stewardship implementation. The healthcare team should consist of infectious disease physicians, pharmacists, infectious disease pharmacists, infection preventionists, microbiologists, and nurses. The scant literature to date has looked at nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward participating in antibiotic stewardship and have identified several factors that contribute to the lack of uptake by nurses: lack of education around stewardship, poor communication among healthcare providers, and hospital or unit culture, among others. Additionally, nurses’ lack of interest in what would be more work or not within their scope of work was put forth as an additional factor by infection preventionists and pharmacists as a barrier to implementation. Method: An investigator-developed online survey was used to assess the usefulness of 3 investigator-developed educational e-learning modules that encompassed the role of nurses in antibiotic stewardship, pharmacy and laboratory topics related to antimicrobial stewardship, as well as the nurses’ attitudes toward their participation in such activities. Results: Participants took the survey after review of the 3 e-learning modules. The results indicate that, contrary to what pharmacists and infection preventionists thought, 82% of nurses felt they should contribute to and be part of the antimicrobial stewardship team. Additionally, after completing the modules, 73% felt more empowered to participate in stewardship discussions with an additional 23% wanting more education. 100% felt that they learned information that they could utilize in their everyday work. Barriers to implementation of stewardship activities on their unit included lack of education (41%), hospital or unit culture (27%), with only 4% citing they did not feel it was their job or that they had anything to contribute to a discussion. Also, 24% felt that there were no obstacles to participation. Conclusions: Surprisingly, most nurses who took this educational series and survey felt that they should be part of the antibiotic stewardship team. As cited previously from the literature, education and culture need to be addressed to overcome the nurses’ barriers to stewardship involvement. E-learning can provide an easy first step to educating nurses when time permits and can provide a good springboard for discussion on the units and with physicians and pharmacists. For a copy of the modules, please contact the author.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s346-s348
Author(s):  
Katharina Rynkiewich ◽  
David Schwartz ◽  
Sarah Won ◽  
Brad Stoner

Background: Two affiliated teaching hospitals in Chicago, Illinois, participated in an ethnographic study of hospital-based inpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs and interventions between 2017 and 2018. Although antimicrobial stewardship is now a requirement in medical practice, it is not clear how infectious disease physicians perceive and understand antimicrobial stewardship. Over a period of 18 months, we directly observed infectious disease practice to better understand how antimicrobial stewardship is conducted among physicians within the same specialty. Methods: A doctoral candidate medical anthropologist conducted semistructured interviews with infectious disease attending physicians and fellow physicians (N = 18) at 2 affiliated teaching hospitals in Chicago, IL, between July 2017 and March 2018 as part of an ethnographic study involving direct observation of inpatient care. Interview questions focused on 3 key domains: (1) descriptions of antimicrobial use among hospital-based physicians, (2) solicited definitions of antimicrobial stewardship, and (3) experiences practicing as an infectious disease consultant. Physicians who were directly involved with the antimicrobial stewardship program were excluded from this analysis. Transcriptions of the data were analyzed using thematic coding aided by MAXQDA qualitative analysis software. Results: Infectious disease physicians have a robust understanding of antimicrobial stewardship (Table 1). Infectious disease physicians described other hospital-based physicians as regularly overusing and misusing antimicrobials, compared with their practice, which they described as “thoughtful.” Definitions in response to the question “What is antimicrobial stewardship?” centered on guiding the prescribing behavior of others. Infectious disease physicians valued stewardship and were concerned with lack of adherence to antimicrobial prescribing recommendations among other hospital-based physicians, behaviors which infectious disease physicians viewed as perpetuating antibiotic resistance. Finally, infectious disease physicians found serving as antimicrobial stewards during their everyday practice to be challenging based on their role as consultants to the primary service. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis revealed that infectious disease physicians not regularly involved in antimicrobial stewardship are highly motivated stewards who perceive their hospital-based colleagues to be less effective at appropriately prescribing antimicrobials. As consultants, infectious disease physicians are not autonomous decision makers. However, as antimicrobial stewardship programs search for champions, infectious disease physicians could be better utilized as knowledgeable and motivated individuals who can make the case for stewardship.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 381-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Morency-Potvin ◽  
David N. Schwartz ◽  
Robert A. Weinstein

SUMMARY Antimicrobial stewardship is a bundle of integrated interventions employed to optimize the use of antimicrobials in health care settings. While infectious-disease-trained physicians, with clinical pharmacists, are considered the main leaders of antimicrobial stewardship programs, clinical microbiologists can play a key role in these programs. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive discussion of the different components of antimicrobial stewardship in which microbiology laboratories and clinical microbiologists can make significant contributions, including cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility reports, enhanced culture and susceptibility reports, guidance in the preanalytic phase, rapid diagnostic test availability, provider education, and alert and surveillance systems. In reviewing this material, we emphasize how the rapid, and especially the recent, evolution of clinical microbiology has reinforced the importance of clinical microbiologists' collaboration with antimicrobial stewardship programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document