scholarly journals Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing: Can E-learning Be a First Step?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s118-s118
Author(s):  
Mary T. Catanzaro

Background: The CDC and The Joint Commission have called for an interdisciplinary approach to antibiotic stewardship implementation. The healthcare team should consist of infectious disease physicians, pharmacists, infectious disease pharmacists, infection preventionists, microbiologists, and nurses. The scant literature to date has looked at nurses’ attitudes and beliefs toward participating in antibiotic stewardship and have identified several factors that contribute to the lack of uptake by nurses: lack of education around stewardship, poor communication among healthcare providers, and hospital or unit culture, among others. Additionally, nurses’ lack of interest in what would be more work or not within their scope of work was put forth as an additional factor by infection preventionists and pharmacists as a barrier to implementation. Method: An investigator-developed online survey was used to assess the usefulness of 3 investigator-developed educational e-learning modules that encompassed the role of nurses in antibiotic stewardship, pharmacy and laboratory topics related to antimicrobial stewardship, as well as the nurses’ attitudes toward their participation in such activities. Results: Participants took the survey after review of the 3 e-learning modules. The results indicate that, contrary to what pharmacists and infection preventionists thought, 82% of nurses felt they should contribute to and be part of the antimicrobial stewardship team. Additionally, after completing the modules, 73% felt more empowered to participate in stewardship discussions with an additional 23% wanting more education. 100% felt that they learned information that they could utilize in their everyday work. Barriers to implementation of stewardship activities on their unit included lack of education (41%), hospital or unit culture (27%), with only 4% citing they did not feel it was their job or that they had anything to contribute to a discussion. Also, 24% felt that there were no obstacles to participation. Conclusions: Surprisingly, most nurses who took this educational series and survey felt that they should be part of the antibiotic stewardship team. As cited previously from the literature, education and culture need to be addressed to overcome the nurses’ barriers to stewardship involvement. E-learning can provide an easy first step to educating nurses when time permits and can provide a good springboard for discussion on the units and with physicians and pharmacists. For a copy of the modules, please contact the author.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Author(s):  
Mary T. Catanzaro

Abstract Objective: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has called for an interdisciplinary approach to antibiotic stewardship implementation that includes front-line nurses. The literature to date has identified key factors preventing uptake by nurses: lack of education, poor communication among providers, and unit culture. Three e-learning modules were developed to address the nurses’ education regarding the roles nurses play in antibiotic stewardship, antibiotic resistance, allergy assessment, medication side effects and interactions, pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics, culture interpretation, specimen collection, and the antibiogram. A survey was used to assess whether nurses felt more prepared to participate after finishing the modules. Setting: Front-line staff nurses in acute care were assigned e-learning modules as part of their pharmacy’s introduction of an antibiotic stewardship program for nurses. Methods: Nurses viewed the modules and completed a survey designed to rank their usefulness and to assess their attitudes. Results: Overall, 81% of nurses felt that they should be part of the antibiotic stewardship team. After completing the modules, 72% felt more empowered to participate in stewardship discussions and an additional 23% requested more education. Also, 97% felt that the information they learned could be utilized in everyday work regardless of the new program. The most cited barriers to stewardship activities were lack of education (45%) and hospital and/or unit culture (13%). Conclusion: Education and culture need to be addressed to overcome the barriers to nurses’ involvement in antimicrobial stewardship. E-learning can provide a simple and effective first step to educate nurses, with minimal time investment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 215-215
Author(s):  
Lucille A. Leong ◽  
Mary Mendelsohn ◽  
Crystal J. Saavedra ◽  
Robert Morgan

215 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity/mortality in cancer pts. VTE is increasing and is the second cause of death in cancer pts, behind only cancer itself. In 2010 of the 186 unique hospitalized cancer pts at our institution with VTE, 25% were medical and 75% surgical. Gaps in clinician knowledge/practice of VTE prevention were evident. Methods: A interdisciplinary approach across clinical and administrative specialties was undertaken, with collaboration between: medical/surgical oncologists, MS leaders, pharmacists, nursing, and hospital departments of QI, information technology, and CME, to educate a target group of 120 cancer clinicians in VTE prophylaxis. In 2/2013 - 2/2014 multiplatform educational initiatives were utilized to reach physicians, advance practice/ward nurses and pharmacists: didactic lectures, Key Opinion Leader visiting professorships, online vignettes, VTE FAQ emails from MS QI leaders, small group sessions, e-learning modules. System changes such as standardized VTE prophylaxis order sets tailored for each service and strategically placed visual cues were also used. Results: Almost 3 times as many unique learners participated in these activities as were targeted. Learner satisfaction, knowledge acquisition and competency were high. Compliance with use of standardized order sets improved from 65 to 95% among the MS. Claims by clinicians of pt contraindications to prophylaxis were audited and found valid. Despite these improvements, incidence of VTE has not dropped, reflecting a national trend. Conclusions: With intensive and interdisciplinary effort, progressin clinician knowledge and performance in VTE prophylaxis can be made. This effort required considerable input from physician champions (eg., surgical oncologists with overlapping roles of clinician, QI advocate, and departmental leader, and medical oncologists with roles of clinician, CME and MS leader). This is a promising model for other QI initiatives. Supported by Unihealth educational grant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (127) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Lewis ◽  
Tracey Pratchett

This study evaluated a national collaborative project to develop generic, freely available e-learning modules on literature search skills for the healthcare workforce in NHS England. Feedback data was drawn from usage reports, an online survey embedded within each module and a separate online survey nationally distributed to health-related library staff.  The modules evaluated positively; learners found them useful, they impacted on learning and confirmed or increased knowledge. Only 3% reported that the modules made no difference to their literature search skills. There was also evidence that some libraries were using the modules as part of their local training. The study suggests that although there are challenges in trying to develop a one size fits all approach to e-learning, collaborating with potential end users and trainers can help to maximise its usefulness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S591-S591
Author(s):  
Mayar Al Mohajer ◽  
Takei Pipkins ◽  
Robert Atmar ◽  
Maria Rodriguez- Barradas ◽  
Edward Young ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship are critical to the safe and effective delivery of patient care. The primary objective of this fellowship rotation is to train infectious diseases fellows to develop key competencies in the fields of infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship. Methods We implemented an infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship rotation for the first-year infectious disease fellows starting July 2017. This new one-month rotation included several lectures by infectious diseases physicians, infection preventionists and pharmacists. Fellows rounded with infection preventionists (isolation, device, environmental, and endoscopy rounds) and participated in infection control subcommittees (CLABSI, CAUTI, Clostridioides difficile colitis and surgical site infections). Fellows were required to present infection control data and develop a proposal for a quality improvement project using the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control (DMAIC) method. Knowledge was evaluated through a 25 item questionnaire administered before (pre) and after (post) rotation. Topics included definitions, surveillance, isolation, preventive methods, outbreak investigation, policies, antibiotic stewardship, healthcare economics, and leadership. Results Sixteen fellows have participated in the rotation (2017-2019); all completed the pre- and post- evaluations (same questionnaire). Fellows answered a mean of 11.1/25 questions correctly pre-course (SD 2.3). Scores improved significantly to a mean of 21.2/25 correct answers at the end of the course (SD 2.6, P< 0.001). All fellows presented quality improvement proposals at the end of the rotation, with a mean score of 85.7% (SD 4.6). The fellows were highly satisfied with the course with mean evaluation score 6.2/7 (88.5%). Conclusion The one month duration infection control and antibiotic stewardship rotation that provides basic training in the field at the beginning of the fellowship led to significant improvement in the fellows’ knowledge, and was very well received. An additional track has been implemented during the second year to prepare interested fellows for careers in infection control and/or antibiotic stewardship. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Bai ◽  
Michael B. Smith

Educational technology is developing rapidly, making education more accessible, affordable, adaptable, and equitable. Students now have the option to choose a campus that can provide excellent blended learning curriculum with minimal geographical restraints. We proactively explore ways to maximize the power of educational technologies to increase enrollment, reduce failure rates, improve teaching efficiency, and cut costs without sacrificing high quality or placing extra burden on faculty. This mission is accomplished through open source learning content design and development. We developed scalable, shareable, and sustainable e-learning modules as book chapters that can be distributed through both computers and mobile devices. The resulting e-learning building blocks can automate the assessment processes, provide just-in-time feedback, and adjust the teaching material dynamically based upon each student’s strengths and weaknesses. Once built, these self-contained learning modules can be easily maintained, shared, and re-purposed, thus cutting costs in the long run. This will encourage faculty from different disciplines to share their best teaching practices online. The end result of the project is a sustainable knowledge base that can grow over time, benefit all the discipline, and promote learning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Abdul Halim ◽  
Elmi Mahzum ◽  
Muhammad Yacob ◽  
Irwandi Irwandi ◽  
Lilia Halim

Physics learning in universities utilized the Moodle-based e-learning media as an online learning platform. However, the effectiveness of remediating misconception using online media has not been widely researched. Therefore, this study was set to determine the level of misconception percentage reduction through the use of narrative feedback, the e-learning modules, and realistic video. The study was a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method involving 281 students who were taking basic physics courses in the Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Education. The data collection used a three-tier diagnostic test based on e-learning at the beginning of the activity and after the treatment (posttest). The results of the data analysis with descriptive statistics show that the most significant treatment in reducing misconception percentage on the topic of free-fall motion was in the following order: narrative feedback, e-learning modules and realistic video. The misconception percentage reduction in the sub-concept of accelerated free- fall was effective for all types of the treatments.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 891-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Masnick ◽  
Daniel J. Morgan ◽  
Marc-Oliver Wright ◽  
Michael Y. Lin ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
...  

We surveyed hospital epidemiologists and infection preventionists on their usage of and satisfaction with infection prevention–specific software supplementing their institution’s electronic medical record. Respondents with supplemental software were more satisfied with their software’s infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship capabilities than those without. Infection preventionists were more satisfied than hospital epidemiologists.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35(7):891–893


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s346-s348
Author(s):  
Katharina Rynkiewich ◽  
David Schwartz ◽  
Sarah Won ◽  
Brad Stoner

Background: Two affiliated teaching hospitals in Chicago, Illinois, participated in an ethnographic study of hospital-based inpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs and interventions between 2017 and 2018. Although antimicrobial stewardship is now a requirement in medical practice, it is not clear how infectious disease physicians perceive and understand antimicrobial stewardship. Over a period of 18 months, we directly observed infectious disease practice to better understand how antimicrobial stewardship is conducted among physicians within the same specialty. Methods: A doctoral candidate medical anthropologist conducted semistructured interviews with infectious disease attending physicians and fellow physicians (N = 18) at 2 affiliated teaching hospitals in Chicago, IL, between July 2017 and March 2018 as part of an ethnographic study involving direct observation of inpatient care. Interview questions focused on 3 key domains: (1) descriptions of antimicrobial use among hospital-based physicians, (2) solicited definitions of antimicrobial stewardship, and (3) experiences practicing as an infectious disease consultant. Physicians who were directly involved with the antimicrobial stewardship program were excluded from this analysis. Transcriptions of the data were analyzed using thematic coding aided by MAXQDA qualitative analysis software. Results: Infectious disease physicians have a robust understanding of antimicrobial stewardship (Table 1). Infectious disease physicians described other hospital-based physicians as regularly overusing and misusing antimicrobials, compared with their practice, which they described as “thoughtful.” Definitions in response to the question “What is antimicrobial stewardship?” centered on guiding the prescribing behavior of others. Infectious disease physicians valued stewardship and were concerned with lack of adherence to antimicrobial prescribing recommendations among other hospital-based physicians, behaviors which infectious disease physicians viewed as perpetuating antibiotic resistance. Finally, infectious disease physicians found serving as antimicrobial stewards during their everyday practice to be challenging based on their role as consultants to the primary service. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis revealed that infectious disease physicians not regularly involved in antimicrobial stewardship are highly motivated stewards who perceive their hospital-based colleagues to be less effective at appropriately prescribing antimicrobials. As consultants, infectious disease physicians are not autonomous decision makers. However, as antimicrobial stewardship programs search for champions, infectious disease physicians could be better utilized as knowledgeable and motivated individuals who can make the case for stewardship.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document