scholarly journals Perceptions of Antimicrobial Stewardship among Infectious Disease Physicians at Two Affiliated Teaching Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s346-s348
Author(s):  
Katharina Rynkiewich ◽  
David Schwartz ◽  
Sarah Won ◽  
Brad Stoner
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Ethnographic Study ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Prescribing Behavior ◽  
Doctoral Candidate ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Primary Service ◽  
Attending Physicians

Background: Two affiliated teaching hospitals in Chicago, Illinois, participated in an ethnographic study of hospital-based inpatient antimicrobial stewardship programs and interventions between 2017 and 2018. Although antimicrobial stewardship is now a requirement in medical practice, it is not clear how infectious disease physicians perceive and understand antimicrobial stewardship. Over a period of 18 months, we directly observed infectious disease practice to better understand how antimicrobial stewardship is conducted among physicians within the same specialty. Methods: A doctoral candidate medical anthropologist conducted semistructured interviews with infectious disease attending physicians and fellow physicians (N = 18) at 2 affiliated teaching hospitals in Chicago, IL, between July 2017 and March 2018 as part of an ethnographic study involving direct observation of inpatient care. Interview questions focused on 3 key domains: (1) descriptions of antimicrobial use among hospital-based physicians, (2) solicited definitions of antimicrobial stewardship, and (3) experiences practicing as an infectious disease consultant. Physicians who were directly involved with the antimicrobial stewardship program were excluded from this analysis. Transcriptions of the data were analyzed using thematic coding aided by MAXQDA qualitative analysis software. Results: Infectious disease physicians have a robust understanding of antimicrobial stewardship (Table 1). Infectious disease physicians described other hospital-based physicians as regularly overusing and misusing antimicrobials, compared with their practice, which they described as “thoughtful.” Definitions in response to the question “What is antimicrobial stewardship?” centered on guiding the prescribing behavior of others. Infectious disease physicians valued stewardship and were concerned with lack of adherence to antimicrobial prescribing recommendations among other hospital-based physicians, behaviors which infectious disease physicians viewed as perpetuating antibiotic resistance. Finally, infectious disease physicians found serving as antimicrobial stewards during their everyday practice to be challenging based on their role as consultants to the primary service. Conclusions: Our qualitative analysis revealed that infectious disease physicians not regularly involved in antimicrobial stewardship are highly motivated stewards who perceive their hospital-based colleagues to be less effective at appropriately prescribing antimicrobials. As consultants, infectious disease physicians are not autonomous decision makers. However, as antimicrobial stewardship programs search for champions, infectious disease physicians could be better utilized as knowledgeable and motivated individuals who can make the case for stewardship.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Changes in antimicrobial prescribing behavior after the introduction of the antimicrobial stewardship program: A pre- and post-intervention survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruchir Chavada ◽  
Harry N. Walker ◽  
Deborah Tong ◽  
Amy Murray
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Electronic Decision Support ◽  
Prescribing Behavior ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test ◽  
Therapeutic Guidelines ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

The introduction of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program is associated with a change in antimicrobial prescribing behavior. A proposed mechanism for this change is by impacting the <em>prescribing</em> <em>etiquette</em> described in qualitative studies. This study sought to detect a change in prescribing attitudes 12 months after the introduction of AMS and gauge utility of various AMS interventions. Surveys were distributed to doctors in two regional Australian hospitals on a convenience basis 6 months before, and 12 months after, the introduction of AMS. Agreement with 20 statements describing attitudes (cultural, behavioral and knowledge) towards antimicrobial prescribing was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale. Mean response scores were compared using the Wilcoxon Rank sum test. 155 responses were collected before the introduction of AMS, and 144 afterwards. After the introduction of AMS, an increase was observed in knowledge about available resources such as electronic decision support systems (EDSS) and therapeutic guidelines, with raised awareness about the support available through AMS rounds and the process to be followed when prescribing restricted antimicrobials. Additionally, doctors were less likely to rely on pharmacy to ascertain when an antimicrobial was restricted, depend on infectious diseases consultant advice and use past experience to guide antimicrobial prescribing. Responses to this survey indicate that positive changes to the antimicrobial prescribing etiquette may be achieved with the introduction of an AMS program. Use of EDSS and other resources such as evidence-based guidelines are perceived to be important to drive rational antimicrobial prescribing within AMS programs.

scholarly journals 101. Impact of an Integrated Tele-Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Rural Community Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S164-S165
Author(s):  
Sui Kwong Li ◽  
Erin K McCreary ◽  
Erin K McCreary ◽  
Tina Khadem ◽  
Nancy Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Material Support ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy

Abstract Background Small hospitals in the US may lack access to infectious diseases (ID) expertise despite similar rates of antimicrobial use and drug-resistant bacteria as larger hospitals. A tele-antimicrobial stewardship program (TASP) is a force multiplier, expanding access to specialty care, training, and guidance on appropriate resource utilization. Data on the impact of TASPs in community or rural inpatient settings is limited. Methods We established a TASP at a 160-bed hospital in Armstrong County, PA (population &lt; 5000) in September 2020. Tele-ID consult services were already being used (Figure 1). A non-local ID pharmacist or ID physician performed prospective audits and provided feedback with 1 local pharmacist on a 30-minute video conference call daily. At TASP implementation, all patients receiving intravenous (IV) fluoroquinolones, metronidazole, and azithromycin were reviewed. Figure 1 shows the additional support following TASP implementation, including addition of ceftriaxone, carbapenems, IV vancomycin, and tocilizumab to daily reviews. A patient monitoring form was developed to track interventions and the local pharmacists were trained in documentation. Table 1 lists other TASP features implemented. Figure 1. TASP Timeline Table 1. TASP Accomplishments Results From 09/01/2020 to 04/30/2021, 304 stewardship opportunities were identified and 77% of interventions were accepted. Recommending a duration of therapy was accepted most frequently (93.5%) and de-escalation of therapy least frequently (69.6%) (Table 2). Recommending an ID consultation or diagnostic testing was always accepted but only comprised 6.2% of all interventions. Daily calls involved an average of 5 patient reviews. Monthly antimicrobial use declined on average from 673 DOT (days of therapy)/1000 PD (patient days) to 638 DOT/1000 PD (Figure 2). Daily calls were cancelled on 31/166 weekdays (18.7%) due to staffing shortages. Table 2. TASP Interventions (9/2020 - 4/2021) Figure 2. Monthly Antimicrobial Use in Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1000 Patient Days (4/2019 - 5/2021) Conclusion Implementation of TASP in a community hospital resulted in a high percentage of accepted stewardship interventions and lower antimicrobial usage. Success is dependent on robust educational efforts, establishing strong relationships with local providers, and involvement of key stakeholders. Lack of dedicated stewardship time for local pharmacists is a very significant barrier. Disclosures Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AbbVie (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant)Entasis (Consultant)Ferring (Consultant)Infectious Disease Connect, Inc (Other Financial or Material Support, Director of Stewardship Innovation)Merck (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Summit (Consultant) Erin K. McCreary, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, AbbVie (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Cidara (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Entasis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Ferring (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Infectious Disease Connect, Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Director of Stewardship Innovation, Other Financial or Material Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Summit (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Tina Khadem, PharmD, Infectious Disease Connect, Inc. (Employee) Nancy Zimmerman, RN, BSN, I’d connect (Employee) John Mellors, MD, Abound Bio, Inc. (Shareholder)Accelevir (Consultant)Co-Crystal Pharma, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, Share Options)Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support)Infectious DIseases Connect (Other Financial or Material Support, Share Options)Janssen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Employee, Director of Clinical Operations) Rima Abdel-Massih, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Chief Medical Officer, Other Financial or Material Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Shareholder J Ryan. Bariola, MD, Infectious Disease Connect (Other Financial or Material Support, salary support)

scholarly journals 63. Impact of Infectious Disease Fellow-Driven Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Inpatient Fluoroquinolone Use

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S150-S150
Author(s):  
Carlos M Nunez ◽  
Arun Mattappallil ◽  
Katie A McCrink ◽  
Debbie Rybak ◽  
Basil Taha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Intervention Phase ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics are frequently used in hospitalized patients to treat a wide range of infections but are often misused and implicated in antibiotic-associated adverse events. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Infectious Disease fellow (IDF)-driven antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions on inpatient FQ use. Methods This is a retrospective study of all admitted patients who received a FQ for greater than 48 hours from 01/01/2019 -12/31/2020 in an urban academic center. “Phase 1” (pre-intervention phase) covered 01/1/2019- 03/31/2019. “Phase 2” (intervention phase) covered 03/03/2020- 12/23/2020. In “Phase 2”, our ASP reviewed FQ use 2-3 days per week and an IDF provided feedback interventions that averaged 30-60 minutes of IDF time spent per day. We categorized FQ use as either: “appropriate”, “appropriate but not preferred”, or “inappropriate”, as determined by local clinical guidelines and ASP team opinion. We compared FQ use in both phases, indications for FQ use, and new Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). Results A total of 386 patients are included (76 in “Phase 1”and 310 in “Phase 2”). Patient characteristics are similar (Table 1). Overall, 63 % of FQ use was empiric, and 50% FQ use was deemed “appropriate”, 28% “appropriate but not preferred”, and 22% “inappropriate”. In “Phase 2”, 126 interventions were conducted, with 86% of these accepted. Appropriate FQ use increased significantly in “Phase 2” vs. “Phase 1” (53.5% vs 35.5%, p = 0.008), with decrease in mean days of FQ use (4.38 days vs 5.87 days, p =.021). Table 2 shows “appropriate” FQ use by clinical indication. New CDIs occurred more in “Phase 1” vs. “Phase 2” (6.6% vs 0.6%, p=.001). Conclusion An IDF-driven ASP intervention has a positive impact on appropriate inpatient use of FQs in our hospital. This highlights a promising ASP model which not only improves appropriate use of FQ, but also offers an opportunity for IDF mentorship and use of available resources to promote ASPs. Disclosures Katie A. McCrink, PharmD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

Feasibility of implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in acute-care hospitals: A nationwide survey in Thailand

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Pinyo Rattanaumpawan ◽  
Surangkana Samanloh ◽  
Visanu Thamlikitkul
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Nationwide Survey ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Infectious Disease Physician ◽  
Hospital Administrator ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract A nationwide survey was conducted in 399 acute-care hospitals in Thailand. Most had a designated antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP), but <20% had an infectious disease physician on the team. The most frequently cited challenges in ASP implementation were the increased workload, followed by a lack of antimicrobial stewardship knowledge and a lack of hospital administrator concern.

An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Based on Systematic Infectious Disease Consultation in a Rehabilitation Facility

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Tedeschi ◽  
Filippo Trapani ◽  
Maddalena Giannella ◽  
Francesco Cristini ◽  
Fabio Tumietto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Rehabilitation Hospital ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVETo assess the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on antibiotic consumption, Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), and antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.DESIGNQuasi-experimental study of the periods before (from January 2011 to June 2012) and after (from July 2012 to December 2014) ASP implementation.SETTING150-bed rehabilitation hospital dedicated to patients with spinal-cord injuries.INTERVENTIONBeginning in July 2012, an ASP was implemented based on systematic bedside infectious disease (ID) consultation and structural interventions (ie, revision of protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis and education focused on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions). Antibiotic consumption, occurrence of CDI, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of selected microorganisms were compared between periods before and after the ASP implementation.RESULTSAntibiotic consumption decreased from 42 to 22 defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient days (P<.001). The main reductions involved carbapenems (from 13 to 0.4 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.01) and fluoroquinolones (from 11.8 to 0.99 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.006), with no increases in mortality or length of stay. The incidence of CDI decreased from 3.6 to 1.2 cases per 10,000 patient days (P=.001). Between 2011 and 2014, the prevalence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains decreased from 55% to 12% in P. aeruginosa (P<.001) and from 96% to 73% in A. baumannii (P=.03). The prevalence of ESBL-producing strains decreased from 42% to 17% in E. coli (P=.0007) and from 62% to 15% in P. mirabilis (P=.0001). In K. pneumoniae, the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains decreased from 42% to 17% (P=.005), and the prevalence of in methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains decreased from 77% to 40% (P<.0008).CONCLUSIONSAn ASP based on ID consultation was effective in reducing antibiotic consumption without affecting patient outcomes and in improving antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;1–7

scholarly journals An Audit-Based, Infectious Disease Specialist-Guided Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Profoundly Reduced Antibiotic Use Without Negatively Affecting Patient Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Nilholm ◽  
Linnea Holmstrand ◽  
Jonas Ahl ◽  
Fredrik Månsson ◽  
Inga Odenholt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Infectious Disease Specialist ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Disease Specialist

Abstract Background.  Antimicrobial stewardship programs are increasingly implemented in hospital care. They aim to simultaneously optimize outcomes for individual patients with infections and reduce financial and health-associated costs of overuse of antibiotics. Few studies have examined the effects of antimicrobial stewardship programs in settings with low proportions of antimicrobial resistance, such as in Sweden. Methods.  An antimicrobial stewardship program was introduced during 5 months of 2013 in a department of internal medicine in southern Sweden. The intervention consisted of audits twice weekly on all patients given antibiotic treatment. The intervention period was compared with a historical control consisting of patients treated with antibiotics in the same wards in 2012. Studied outcome variables included 28-day mortality and readmission, length of hospital stay, and use of antibiotics. Results.  A reduction of 27% in total antibiotic use (2387 days of any antibiotic) was observed in the intervention period compared with the control period. The reduction was due to fewer patients started on antibiotics as well as to significantly shorter durations of antibiotic courses (P &lt; .001). An earlier switch to oral therapy and a specific reduction in use of third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones was also evident. Mortality, total readmissions, and lengths of stay in hospital were unchanged compared with the control period, whereas readmissions due to a nonresolved infection were fewer during the intervention of 2013. Conclusions.  This study demonstrates that an infectious disease specialist-guided antimicrobial stewardship program can profoundly reduce antibiotic use in a low-resistance setting with no negative effect on patient outcome.

scholarly journals 31. Stepwise Expansion of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and Its Impact on Antibiotic Use and Resistance Rates in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S138-S138
Author(s):  
Dong Hoon Shin ◽  
Hyung-sook kim ◽  
Eunjeong Heo ◽  
Myoung Jin Shin ◽  
Nak-Hyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
The Core ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
National University

Abstract Background The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released the core elements of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). In some countries, however, they may be difficult to apply in countries with limited resources. In this study, we evaluated the impact of successful ASP implementation on antibiotic use and resistance rates in an institution with limited infrastructural support. Methods A series of ASP activities were reviewed according to the core elements of ASP. The retrospective data of all hospitalized patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital was collected from January 2010 to December 2019, including antibiotic prescription data and culture results of all clinical specimens. The trends of the antibiotic-resistant rates were compared with nationwide data in Korea. The trend analyses were performed with 2-sided correlated seasonal Mann-Kendall nonparametric tests. Results The ASP activities over the past decade were summarized in Table. After activities such as preauthorization were achieved, other ASP activities were added one by one. Also, the infectious disease pharmacists, as ASP co-leaders, mainly carried out the following activities: reducing redundant anti-anaerobic antimicrobials and intravenous fluoroquinolones, and advised the physicians to discontinue the antibiotic prescription in cases when the intervention was plausible. After the ASP implementation, total antibacterial use significantly decreased (P &lt; 0.01; Figure). The use of glycopeptides (P &lt; 0.01) and fluoroquinolones (P &lt; 0.01) gradually decreased, while the use of third-generation cephalosporines did not significantly change (P=0.48). There was no significant change in total carbapenems use, but ertapenem use increased (P=0.02). Compared with the nationwide data, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was on a decreasing trend consistently. Although third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli increased, third-generation cephalosporin resistant-Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem resistant-Pseudomonas aeruginosa did not increase. Table. Antimicrobial stewardship activities for hospitalized patients over the past decade in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. ASP: antimicrobial stewardship; ID: infectious disease; CDSS: Clinical decision support system Figure. DOT per 1,000 patient-days in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and implemented actions of antimicrobial stewardship program. DOT: days of therapy; ID: infectious disease; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; GPC: gram positive cocci; Group 1 carbapenem: ertapenem Conclusion A stepwise implementation of the core ASP elements was effective in improving the appropriate use of antibiotics and reducing the antibiotic resistant organisms, even with limited human resources. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 2027. What Are the Views Among Pakistani Physicians Toward Antimicrobial Resistance and Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs? A Multi-Site Qualitative Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S681-S681
Author(s):  
Khezar Hayat ◽  
Meagen Rosenthal ◽  
Ali Hassan Gillani ◽  
Panpan Zhai ◽  
Wenjing Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Stewardship Program

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health issue that the world is facing in the 21st century and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is one of the recognized approaches to combat AMR. Little is known on the views among Pakistani physicians regarding AMR and the benefits of hospital ASP implementation. This study was aimed to investigate the perception and attitude of physicians about AMR and ASP. Methods Qualitative face-to-face and telephonic interviews were conducted by using purposive sampling method with 22 physicians working in seven tertiary care public hospitals of Punjab, Pakistan. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative software was used, and a thematic analysis conducted. Results Three major themes were identified: (1) the growing concern of AMR in Pakistan, (2) the role(s) of healthcare professionals in antibiotic prescribing and infection control, and (3) managing antibiotic resistance in hospitals. Poor healthcare facilities, insufficient trained medical staff, and inadequate resources were the key barriers in the implementation of ASP in Pakistan. Conclusion Physicians of public sector tertiary care teaching hospitals have shown poor familiarity toward hospital ASPs but the concept of hospital ASPs in Pakistan can be established by using the distinct themes that originated during this study. Overall, the attitude of physicians was positive toward its enforcement in all types of hospital settings including teaching hospitals. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Utilization of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Three Common Abdominal Surgeries, Adherence to Standard Guidelines and Surgeons' Perception in Teaching Hospitals, Islamabad, Pakistan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zakir Khan ◽  
Naveed Ahmed ◽  
Asim ur Rehman ◽  
Faiz ullah Khan ◽  
Hazir Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Correct Choice ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Stewardship Program

Background and objectives: The appropriate use of antibiotics is the main strategy of Antimicrobial stewardship program. This study was planned to evaluate the quality of antibiotic prescriptions, its adherence with standard guidelines and surgeons&rsquo; perception regarding antibiotic use in surgeries. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional observational and survey-based study comprised of two sections: Phase 1; to investigate the antibiotic utilization in three most common abdominal surgical procedures during 9 months (January 2017 to September 2017). The appropriateness of antibiotics was compared with evidence-based guidelines. Phase 2; the surgeon&rsquo;s perspectives were evaluated through a self-administered questionnaire (13 items) during the next three months (October 2017 to December 2017). Descriptive statistics, chi-square and Fisher&rsquo;s exact tests analysis were used through SPSS Statistical Package 21.0. Results: A total of 866 eligible surgical cases out of 1015 were investigated. An acute appendectomy (n= 418; 48.2%) was most common surgical intervention followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n= 278; 32.1%) and inguinal hernia (n= 170; 19.7%). About 97.5% of patients received antibiotics. Among these, 9.5% adhered according to guidelines with respect to correct choice, 40% for timing, 100% for dose and route (optimal value 100%). The ceftriaxone (J01XD04; n= 503; 59.5%) was most frequently prescribed antibiotic. A 200 participants (response rate 70.6%) filled out a validated questionnaire (internal consistency; &alpha; &ge; 0.7). One hundred and thirty-eight (69%) reported the overuse of antibiotics and most of them (97%) preferred broad-spectrum antibiotics instead of narrow-spectrum. The participants reported that non-availability hospital-based guidelines (n=193; 96.5%), prescribing of antibiotics without guidelines (n=186; 93%), underestimation of infection (n=177; 88.5%), lack of consensus (n=135; 67.5%) and poor awareness about guidelines (n=122; 61%) were the main determinants in their health care settings. Conclusions: The compliance of Surgical antibiotic was far below the recommendations of guidelines. The urgent needs of awareness among surgeons and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program were important recommended interventions for appropriate use antibiotics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document