Type II radical hysterectomy and adjuvant therapy for pelvic lymph node metastasis with stage IB-IIB cervical carcinoma: A retrospective study of 288 patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Zheng ◽  
Long Huang ◽  
Ji-Hong Liu ◽  
Ying Xiong ◽  
Jun-Dong Li ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kartiwa H Nuryanto ◽  
Sigit Purbadi

Objective: To evaluate the theurapeutic response and acute toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy between the combination of Platinum and Ifosfamide, and the combination of Platinum, Vincristine and Bleomycin in Cervical Carcinoma Stage IB2 and then continued with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Method: Thirteen samples received neoadjuvant chemotherapy of Platinum and Ifosfamide and 17 samples received neoadjuvant chemotherapy of Platinum, Vincristine and Bleomycin, after receiving the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, clinically complete response samples underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PI VS PVB = 3 VS 1). Histopathology examination was performed to evaluate the presence of malignant viable cells at the cervix, pelvic lymph node metastasis and parametrium metastasis. Acute toxicity evaluation was performed based on gastrointestinal, genitourinarius and hematology sign and symptom. Result: Theurapeutic response of PI is 1.12 higher than PVB (p>0.05). Subanalysis of group response of PI is 1.962 higher than PVB. PI and PVB have the same risk to have pelvic lymph node metastasis, but not parametrial metastasis. There were no differences in terms of the risk of gastrointestinal, genitourinarius and hematologic toxicity between PI and PVB. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in clinical and pathological response, and also in acute toxicity between the two combination (p>0.05). [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 1: 47-51] Keywords: acute toxicity, cervical carcinoma stage IB2, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, response


Author(s):  
Yahya Irwanto

Objective: To know whether the expression of Fas Ligand has correlation with incidene of metastasis of pelvic lymph node and lymph-vascular stromal invasion (LVSI). Methods: All patients diagnosed of cervical cancer stage IB or IIA who underwent radical hysterectomy in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Central General Hospital from January 2008 until December 2009 were included in analytic cross sectional study. We tested expression of Fas Ligand in cervical cancer specimen by immunohystochemistry with monoclonal antibody. The expression of Fas Ligand was compared between the group of patients with a positive and negative pelvic lymph node and between LVSI positive and negative. The difference of expression in both group were statistically analized with Chi-square test and the correlation Spearman test. Result: Ninety one patients underwent radical hysterectomy for two years and 43 patients were included in these study. The expression of Fas Ligand in 7 patients (16.3%) were negative and the others were positive, with weak, moderate and strong expression were 4 (9.3%), 27 (62.8%), and 5 (11.6%) respectively. The expression of Fas Ligand was significantly higher in the group of patients with positive pelvic lymph node compared to the group of the patients with negative pelvic lymph node (p=0.007) but there was no significant difference between group of the patients with LVSI positive and negative. With Spearman test, we found that the expression of Fas Ligand had a strong correlation with pelvic lymph nodes metastasis (coeff. correlation=0.519 and p=0.00) and have no correlation with LVSI (coef. corellation=0.112 and p=0.474). Conclusion: These finding suggested that expression of Fas Ligand in cervical cancer patients has a strong correlation with the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis and none with LVSI. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 36-4: 194-9] Keywords: cervical cancer, fas ligand, immunohystochemistry, LVSI, pelvic lymph node metastasis


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Narumiya ◽  
Kenji Kudo ◽  
Yosuke Yagawa ◽  
Shinsuke Maeda ◽  
Yukinori Toyoshima ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundIncidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is increasing in Japan as well as Western Country. However, there is no consensus on treatment strategy. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal range of resection and lymph node dissection for Siewert type II AEG and to develop a strategy for treatment that includes adjuvant therapy to improve the survival rate. MethodsWe retrospectively investigate 88 cases of advanced AEG in patients who underwent surgery with lymph node dissection with 52 cases of superficial AEG, 23 of whom underwent endoscopic treatment (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR] or endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]), and 29 of whom underwent surgery with lymph node dissection. ResultsThe optimal lymph nodes to resect for advanced AEG were in the inferior mediastinum (No. 110), in the lesser curvature (Nos. 1, 3, 7), No. 2, and No 11. According to area of actual lymph node metastasis, lymphadenectomy of lymph nodes 1, 2, 3, 7, and 11 was sufficient to improve survival of patients with superficial AEG. If esophageal involvement was >40 mm, we performed esophagectomy through right thoracotomy. The 5-year overall survival rates were 88% for patients treated with ESD, 78% for those with superficial AEG who under-went surgery, and 24% for those with advanced AEG (p = 0.011). Despite of lymph node dissection, twenty-five patients experienced lymph node metastasis after operation in advanced AEG and there were many disseminations in advanced AEG. There were no differences in survival between patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 for advanced AEG and those who received surgery alone (p = 0.5192).Conclusion Although surgical procedures of superficial and locally advanced AEG are standardized, the role of adjuvant therapy for AEG is still controversial. We recommend nab-paclitaxel plus radiotherapy for advanced AEG as neoadjuvant therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document