Cost-utility analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A health economic assessment from the perspective of a publicly funded program

2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1452-1458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Chen ◽  
Hossam Amoodi ◽  
Nicole Mittmann
2007 ◽  
Vol 191 (S50) ◽  
pp. s42-s45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul McCrone

BackgroundIt is essential in economic evaluations of schizophrenia interventions that all relevant costs are identified and measured appropriately Also of importance is the way in which cost data are combined with information on outcomesAimsTo examine the use of health economicsin evaluations of interventions for schizophreniaMethodsAreview of the key methods used to estimate costs and to link costs and outcomes was conductedResultsCosts fall on a number of different agencies and can be short term or long term. Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis are the most appropriate methods for combing cost and outcome dataConclusionsSchizophrenia poses a number of challenges for economic evaluation


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 454-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Foteff ◽  
Steven Kennedy ◽  
Abul Hasnat Milton ◽  
Melike Deger ◽  
Florian Payk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Jalkanen ◽  
Emma Aarnio ◽  
Piia Lavikainen ◽  
Jaana Lindström ◽  
Markku Peltonen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Early identification of people at elevated risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an important step in preventing or delaying its onset. Pharmacies can serve as a significant channel to reach these people. This study aimed to assess the potential health economic impact of screening and recruitment services in pharmacies in referring people to preventive interventions. Methods A decision analytic model was constructed to perform a cost-utility analysis of the expected national health economic consequences (in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) of a hypothetical pharmacy-based service where people screened and recruited through pharmacies would participate in a digital lifestyle program. Cost-effectiveness was considered in terms of net monetary benefit (NMB). In addition, social return on investment (SROI) was calculated as the ratio of the intervention and recruitment costs and the net present value of expected savings. Payback time was the time taken to reach the break-even point in savings. In the base scenario, a 20-year time horizon was applied. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were applied to study robustness of the results. Results In the base scenario, the expected savings from the pharmacy-based screening and recruitment among the reached target cohort were 255.3 m€ (95% CI − 185.2 m€ to 717.2 m€) in pharmacy visiting population meaning 1412€ (95% CI − 1024€ to 3967€) expected savings per person. Additionally, 7032 QALYs (95% CI − 1344 to 16,143) were gained on the population level. The intervention had an NMB of 3358€ (95% CI − 1397€ to 8431€) using a cost-effectiveness threshold of 50,000 €/QALY. The initial costs were 122.2 m€ with an SROI of 2.09€ (95% CI − 1.52€ to 5.88€). The expected payback time was 10 and 8 years for women and men, respectively. Results were most sensitive for changes in effectiveness of the intervention and selected discount rate. Conclusions T2D screening and recruitment to prevention programs conducted via pharmacies was a dominant option providing both cost savings and QALY gains. The highest savings can be potentially reached by targeting recruitment at men at elevated risk of T2D.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Henryk Skarzynski ◽  
Katarzyna Ciesla ◽  
Artur Lorens ◽  
Joanna Wojcik ◽  
Henryk Skarzynski

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Goel ◽  
Allan S. Detsky

It has been suggested that preoperative total parentetal nutrition may be used to reduce the risk of nutrition-associated postoperative complications in high-risk patients. These patients can be identified based on their nutritional status. The efficiency of this intervention is assessed using the technique of cost-utility analysis. Data from multiple sources is integrated to perform the economic assessment.The cost-utility ratios for treating several malnourished patients with localized upper gastrointestinal cancer are below $40,000. These cost-utility ratios compare favorably with published results of other programs. The ratios increase considerably if patients who are better nourished (at lower risk of postoperative complication) receive the intervention. The analysis is very sensitive to the efficacy of the intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document