Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: Relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-France Bertrand ◽  
Gianfranco Semez ◽  
Eric Leforestier ◽  
Michèle Muller-Bolla ◽  
Samir Nammour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Laser Cavity ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Component ◽  
Cavity Preparation ◽  
Resin Bonding

scholarly journals Bond Durability of Er:YAG Laser-Prepared Primary Tooth Enamel

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Mayara Garcia Martinelli ◽  
Marta Maria Martins Giamatei Contente ◽  
Talitha de Siqueira Mellara ◽  
Jesus Djalma Pecora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Tooth Enamel ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Cavity Preparation ◽  
Etch And Rinse

This study evaluated in vitro the influence of thermocycling and water storage (WS) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin in cavities prepared in primary tooth enamel with conventional bur or Er:YAG laser. The test surfaces were obtained from 48 primary molars and randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=24), according to cavity preparation: A: bur-preparation and B: Er:YAG laser irradiation. The specimens were restored with an etch-and-rinse adhesive system and composite resin. Each group was divided into 4 subgroups (n=6) according to WS duration and number of thermal cycles (TCs): I: 24 h WS/no thermocycling; II: 7 days WS/500 TCs; III: 1 month WS/2,000 TCs; IV: 6 months WS/12,000 TCs. The specimens were tested to failure in shear strength at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. SBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: AI: 17.45 (2.03), AII:16.38 (1.49), AIII: 6.88 (0.66), AIV: 7.77 (1.53), BI: 12.32 (0.99), BII: 15.37 (2.24), BIII: 15.05 (2.01) and BIV-5.51 (1.01). WS duration and number of TCs influenced significantly the SBS values only for BIV (p<0.05). AI presented the highest SBS value, which was statistically similar to those of AII, BII and BIII. In conclusion, the adhesion of an etch-and-rinse adhesive to Er:YAG laser-irradiated primary tooth enamel was affected by the methods used to simulate degradation of the adhesive interface only when 6 months WS/12,000 TCs were employed.

scholarly journals Fracture resistance of incisal tooth fragment reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Fábio Herrmann Coelho-de-Souza ◽  
Guilherme Fossá ◽  
Flávia Ávila Pereira ◽  
Celso Afonso Klein-Júnior ◽  
Maria Carolina Guilherme Erhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Adhesive Materials ◽  
Group 1

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated in vitro the shear bond strength of experimentally fractured human tooth fragments reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques.METHODS: Forty-eight sound mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 6 groups (n=8). Their incisal edges were cut off in 5 groups, representing an enamel-dentin fracture. Intact teeth were used as control (Group 1). The fragment edges were reattached with adhesive system (Scotch Bond Multipurpose – 3M ESPE) (Group 2), adhesive system and composite resin (ICE – SDI) (Group 3), adhesive system and composite resin with circumferential bevel (Group 4), adhesive system and composite resin with internal dentin groove (Group 5), and adhesive system and composite resin with the circumferential bevel and internal dentin groove (Group 6). Shear bond strength was determined in a universal testing machine. Fracture modes were identified by light microscope. Kruskal-Wallis was used to analysis resistance to fracture and fracture patterns.RESULTS: The results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) among groups. The intact teeth (Group 1) showed higher fracture resistance than the other groups. Groups 2 and 6 did not differ and were statistically superior to other techniques. Group 4 presented statistically higher than in Group 5, which in turn was more resistant than Group 3.CONCLUSIONS: None of the fragment reattachment techniques was able to achieve the strength of sound teeth. Fragments reattached only with adhesive system or with adhesive system and composite resin with the circumferential bevel and internal dentin groove showed the best performance for resistance to fracture.

scholarly journals Impact of Intracoronal Dentin Treatment Prior to Bleaching on Bond Strength of Restorative Materials

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Moreno Zanconato-Carvalho ◽  
João Felipe Bruniera ◽  
Natália Spadini de Faria ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Danielle Cristine Messias
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Bleaching Procedure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Materials

Surface treatment of dentin before the bleaching procedure may affect its permeability and influence the bond strength of restorative materials. This study evaluated the influence of surface treatment before the bleaching on shear bond strength (SBT) of restorative materials to intracoronal dentin. Dentin slabs were subjected to surface treatment: no bleaching (control - CON), no surface treatment + bleaching (HP), 37% phosphoric acid + bleaching (PA) and Er:YAG laser + bleaching (L). After the bleaching procedure, specimens (n=10) were restored with: microhybrid composite resin (MH), flowable composite resin (F), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). The shear test was carried out. ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) showed significant difference for surface treatment and restorative materials (p<0.05). CON presented higher STB and was statistically different from HP (p<0.05). PA and L showed intermediate values and were statistically similar to CON and HP (p>0.05). STB for MH and F were higher than RMGIC (p<0.05), and did not differ from each other (p>0.05). The surface treatments with phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser before the bleaching procedure provided shear bond strength at the same level of unbleached dentin and the composite resins presented superior bond strength to the intracoronal dentin.

The effects of three different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of composite resin bonding agents

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahya Orcun Zorba ◽  
Ali Erdemir ◽  
Ertugrul Ercan ◽  
Ayce Unverdi Eldeniz ◽  
Baris Kalaycioǧlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Desensitizing Agents ◽  
Resin Bonding

scholarly journals Aplikasi klorheksidin glukonat 2%pada dentin tidak mempengaruhi kuat rekat geserkomposit resinyangmenggunakansistem adesif self etch (2% Chlorhexidine gluconate application on dentine does not affect bond strength of resin composite using self etch adhesive system)

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Dewi Puspitasari ◽  
Andi Soufyan ◽  
Ellyza Herda
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Group I ◽  
Self Etch

Composite resin is a widely used aesthetic restoration. The restoration can fail due to secondary caries. Chlorhexidinegluconate 2% is used as a cavity disinfectant to eliminate microorganisms on the prepared cavity and to prevent thesecondary caries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% to the bondstrength of composite resin with self etch system adhesive on dentine. Sixteen specimens of buccal dentine of premolarscrown are divided into 2 different groups. Group I: Clearfil SE Bond self-etch primer was applied for 20 seconds,Clearfil SE Bond bonding was applied for 5 seconds and polymerized for 10 seconds. Composite resin was constructedincrementally and polymerized for 20 seconds. Group II: prior to self etch primer application as in group I,chlorhexidine gluconate 2% was applied for 15 seconds. Shear bond strength was tested using Testing machine andanalyzed with unpaired T test. The highest shear bond strength was obtained by applying chlorhexidine gluconate 2%.The study concludes that chlorhexidine gluconate 2% application to dentine did not affect significantly to the bondstrength composite resin using self etch adhesive systems.

scholarly journals Cavity Preparation by Laser in Primary Teeth: Effect of 2 Levels of Energy Output on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Restoration to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrsa Paryab ◽  
Shahrzad Sharifi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Kharazifard ◽  
Nazanin Kumarci
Keyword(s):  
Energy Level ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Energy Output ◽  
Primary Tooth ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Tooth Dentin ◽  
Self Etch

Introduction: One of the main applications of laser in dentistry is the removal of dental caries and preparation of restorative cavities. The morphology and wettability of laser prepared surfaces are different from that of those prepared with conventional method which may affect the quality of the adhesive potential of bonding agents in these surfaces. This study aimed to assess the shear bond strength of a total-etch and self-etch adhesive system to primary tooth dentin prepared by two different energy densities of Er:YAG laser in comparison with surfaces prepared by bur. Methods: A total of 60 human primary second molars extracted for orthodontic purposes were selected and randomly divided into 3 main groups of equal (n=20). Group A: Preparation of dentin surface by bur; group B: Preparation of dentin surface by laser with 300 mJ energy level; group C: Preparation of dentin surface by laser with 400 mJ energy level. In each of the main groups, the teeth were randomly assigned to 2 subgroups. Composite resin material was bonded with the total-etch adhesive system in subgroups A1, B1, and C1 and with the self-etch adhesive system in subgroups A2, B2, and C2. The samples were thermo-cycled, and composite restorations shear bond strength was measured in MPa. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The highest and the lowest shear bond strength values were observed in group A2 (Preparation by bur- Composite resin material bonded by Clearfil SE Bond) and group C2 (Preparation by laser with 400 mJ energy level - Composite resin material bonded by Clearfil SE Bond), respectively. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the study subgroups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It is concluded that in terms of shear bond strength to dentin, Single Bond and Clearfil SE Bond adhesive agents adequately perform in primary tooth dentin prepared by Er: YAG laser with energy levels of 300 and 400 mJ and frequency of 10 Hz.

Influence of femtosecond laser treatment on shear bond strength of composite resin bonding to human dentin under simulated pulpal pressure

2011 ◽  
Vol 100B (1) ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Gerhardt-Szep ◽  
Kristian Werelius ◽  
Francoise de Weerth ◽  
Detlef Heidemann ◽  
Paul Weigl
Keyword(s):  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
Resin Bonding

scholarly journals Effect of Metalloproteinase Inhibitors on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Er:YAG Laser-Irradiated Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Carlos Correa ◽  
Rodrigo Galo ◽  
Camila Scatena ◽  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Aloísio Oro Spazzin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Chemical Degradation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract This study evaluated the effect of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors - 2% (CHX) and sodium fluoride (NaF) (5000 ppm) - on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of composite resin to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin after chemical degradation of the bond interface. The occlusal surface of forty sound human molars was removed exposing the dentin surface (n=10), which was polished, irradiated with Er:YAG laser, acid etched and dried. Twenty specimens were rewetted with 2% CHX (control group) and 20 were rewetted with NaF (5000 ppm). The adhesive system was applied and a 4-mm-high plateau of light-cured composite resin was built up. Resin-dentin sticks were obtained with a rectangular cross-sectional area (0.8-1 mm2) and were either stored in water at 37 ?#61616;C for 24 h or submitted to chemical degradation. For chemical degradation, they were immersed in 10% NaOCl aqueous solution for 5 h and rinsed in water for 1 h. The sticks were submitted to microtensile test in a mechanical testing machine at 0.5 mm/min until failure. Fracture pattern was analyzed using SEM. μTBS values were calculated in MPa and submitted to analysis of variance ANOVA (α=0.05). The variance analysis showed that the 'MMP inhibitor' and 'degradation' factors (p=0.214 and p=0.093, respectively) and interaction between the factors were not statistically significant (p=0.143). Mixed failure predominated in all groups. In conclusion, the 2% CHX and NaF 5000 ppm presented similar μTBS of composite resin to laser-irradiated dentin before and after chemical degradation

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document