Chromosomal mosaicism: Origins and clinical implications in preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brynn Levy ◽  
Eva R. Hoffmann ◽  
Rajiv C. McCoy ◽  
Francesca R. Grati
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Ma ◽  
Hui Xi ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
Ying Peng ◽  
Zhengjun Jia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Emerging studies suggest that low‐coverage massively parallel copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) more sensitive than chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for detecting low-level mosaicism. However, a retrospective back-to-back comparison evaluating accuracy, efficacy, and incremental yield of CNV-seq compared with CMA is warranted. Methods A total of 72 mosaicism cases identified by karyotyping or CMA were recruited to the study. There were 67 mosaic samples co-analysed by CMA and CNV-seq, comprising 40 with sex chromosome aneuploidy, 22 with autosomal aneuploidy and 5 with large cryptic genomic rearrangements. Results Of the 67 positive mosaic cases, the levels of mosaicism defined by CNV-seq ranged from 6 to 92% compared to the ratio from 3 to 90% by karyotyping and 20% to 72% by CMA. CNV-seq not only identified all 43 chromosomal aneuploidies or large cryptic genomic rearrangements detected by CMA, but also provided a 34.88% (15/43) increased yield compared with CMA. The improved yield of mosaicism detection by CNV-seq was largely due to the ability to detect low level mosaicism below 20%. Conclusion In the context of prenatal diagnosis, CNV-seq identified additional and clinically significant mosaicism with enhanced resolution and increased sensitivity. This study provides strong evidence for applying CNV-seq as an alternative to CMA for detection of aneuploidy and mosaic variants.


2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 739-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Battaglia ◽  
Anna Baroncini ◽  
Angela Mattarozzi ◽  
Ilaria Baccolini ◽  
Antonella Capucci ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aubrey Milunsky ◽  
Leonard Atkins

1984 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Claussen ◽  
Helmut Sch�fer ◽  
Hans J. Trampisch

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jovan Kosutic ◽  
Sergej Prijic ◽  
Mila Stajevic ◽  
Marija Kalaba ◽  
Sanja Ninic ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
pp. 3775-3782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodora Pappa ◽  
João Anselmo ◽  
Sunnee Mamanasiri ◽  
Alexandra M Dumitrescu ◽  
Roy E Weiss ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Javier Sánchez ◽  
Lutgardo García-Díaz ◽  
David Chinchón ◽  
Guillermo Antiñolo

Monosomy of chromosome 14 has been reported in only a few prenatal cases. Generally, this monosomy is associated with a mosaicism of ring chromosome 14. Ring chromosome 14 is a rare cytogenetic entity with clinical characteristics that include growth retardation, facial dysmorphia, hypotonia, seizures, and retinitis pigmentosa. Given that the majority of symptoms appear postnatally, few cases have been reported of prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism monosomy/ring chromosome 14. We describe the prenatal diagnosis of a case of chromosomal mosaicism, a cell line with ring chromosome 14, r(14), and a second cell line with monosomy 14, in a fetus with aortic coarctation and chamber asymmetry. This is the first case of a prenatal diagnosis associating mosaicism with ring chromosome 14, monosomy 14, and fetal cardiopathy. We identified the exact breakpoint in ring chromosome 14 in IGH locus, which may provide further insight into the mode of ring formation as well as prenatal findings.


1972 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataline B. Kardon ◽  
Patrice R. Chernay ◽  
Lillian Y. Hsu ◽  
Joan L. Martin ◽  
Kurt Hirschhorn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document