Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping

1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Lazarus ◽  
Susan Folkman

In this article we examine the fundamental premises of our cognitive‐relational theory of emotion and coping and assess our progress in examining them through 10 years of programmatic empirical research. Our discussion involves the metatheoretical topics of transaction and relationship, process, and emotion as a system. The person‐environment relationship is mediated by two key processess: cognitive appraisal and coping. We evaluate the findings of our research on these processes, their dynamic interplay, their antecedents, and their short‐term and long‐term outcomes. In the final section we highlight major substantive and methodological issues that need to be addressed. These include issues surrounding the theory and measurement of appraisal, functional and dysfunctional coping, causal inference, microanalytic vs macroanalytic research strategies, objective vs subjective approaches and confounding, and the problem of method variance.

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Jothydev Kesavadev ◽  
Shashank Joshi ◽  
Banshi Saboo ◽  
Hemant Thacker ◽  
Arun Shankar ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-334
Author(s):  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Naoya Yoshida ◽  
Yoshifumi Baba ◽  
Yohei Nagai ◽  
Hideo Baba

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
Kosei Takagi ◽  
Yuzo Umeda ◽  
Ryuichi Yoshida ◽  
Nobuyuki Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Kuise ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirhasan Rahimli ◽  
Aristotelis Perrakis ◽  
Vera Schellerer ◽  
Andrew Gumbs ◽  
Eric Lorenz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.


2014 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1400-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puja Gaur ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kaneko ◽  
Siobhan McGurk ◽  
James D. Rawn ◽  
Ann Maloney ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Noguchi ◽  
Atsushi Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazuhiro Naito ◽  
Kouichi Yuri ◽  
Hideo Adachi

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S33
Author(s):  
H. Shinkawa ◽  
S. Tanaka ◽  
S. Takemura ◽  
R. Amano ◽  
K. Kimura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document