The EORTC QLQ-CX24 cervical cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire: psychometric properties in a South Asian sample of cervical cancer patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 1053-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harindra Jayasekara ◽  
Lalini C. Rajapaksa ◽  
Elfriede R. Greimel
2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
JÖRG DIRMAIER ◽  
SILKE ZAUN ◽  
UWE KOCH ◽  
TIMO HARFST ◽  
HOLGER SCHULZ

Objective: Recent years have shown an increase in the use of questionnaires measuring health-related quality of life to verify the quality of treatment in the field of oncology. An often used cancer-specific questionnaire is the “Quality of Life Core Questionnaire of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer” (EORTC QLQ-C30). The purpose of this study is to analyze the psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 1) in order to determine the feasibility and appropriateness for its use in inpatient cancer rehabilitation in Germany with heterogeneous diagnoses.Methods: The questionnaire was administrated to a sample of 972 cancer patients at the beginning of treatment and to 892 patients after treatment. Besides descriptive analysis, the statistical analyses include confirmatory analysis and the multitrait/multimethod approach to test the questionnaire's postulated scale structure (factorial validity) and its reliability (internal consistencies). The analysis also includes a comparison of responsiveness indices (effect size, reliable change index) to test the sensitivity of the instrument.Results: The EORTC QLQ-C30 showed satisfactory levels of reliability and sensitivity, but the postulated scale structure could not be confirmed. The results illustrate that the varimax-rotated solution of a principal component analysis does not confirm the scale structure postulated by the authors. Correspondingly, the selected fit indices within the scope of the confirmatory factor analysis do not show satisfactory results either.Significance of results: We therefore consider version 1 of the EORTC QLQ-C30 to be only limitedly useful for the routine assessment of changes in the quality of life of cancer patients in inpatient rehabilitation in Germany, especially because of the instrument's length and possible redundancies. For this reason, a scoring procedure limited to a subset of items is suggested, revealing satisfactory to good psychometric indices. However, further psychometric tests are necessary, especially with regard to validity and sensitivity.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1008-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Bjordal ◽  
Eva Hammerlid ◽  
Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist ◽  
Alexander de Graeff ◽  
Morten Boysen ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the scales and test the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-H&N35, a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of life of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients in conjunction with the general cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were given to 500 H&N cancer patients from Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands as part of two prospective studies. The patients completed the questionnaires before, during (Norway and Sweden only), and after treatment, yielding a total of 2070 completed questionnaires. RESULTS: The compliance rate was high, and the questionnaires were well accepted by the patients. Seven scales were constructed (pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, sexuality). Scales and single items were sensitive to differences between patient subgroups with relation to site, stage, or performance status. Most scales and single items were sensitive to changes, with differences of various magnitudes according to the site in question. The internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, varied according to assessment point and within subsamples of patients. A low overall alpha value was found for the speech and the senses scales, but values were higher in assessments of patients with laryngeal cancer and in patients with nose, sinus, and salivary gland tumors. Scales and single items in the QLQ-H&N35 seem to be more sensitive to differences between groups and changes over time than do the scales and single items in the core questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical studies of H&N cancer patients before, during, and after treatment with radiotherapy, surgery, or chemotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Mizanul Adli ◽  
Hamzah Shatri ◽  
Noorwati Sutandyo ◽  
Suhendro Suwarto

Pendahuluan. Peningkatan angka ketahanan hidup pasien kanker payudara tidak selalu diikuti oleh peningkatan kualitas hidup. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) menekankan pentingnya melakukan penilaian kualitas hidup pada pasien kanker. Saat ini, di Indonesia, belum ada kuesioner yang valid dan reliabel untuk menilai kualitas hidup pasien kanker payudara secara akurat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan bahwa European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast 23 (EORTC QLQ-BR23) merupakan alat ukur yang reliabel dan valid digunakan di IndonesiaMetode. Penelitian ini adalah studi potong lintang. Penelitian dimulai dengan menerjemahkan EORTC QLQ-BR23 ke dalam bahasa Indonesia dan kemudian di uji coba pada 10 responden. Setelah itu, EORTC QLQ-BR23 hasil terjemahan digunakan pada penelitian utama dengan jumlah sampel yang lebih besar. Test-retest dinilai dengan Intraclass Correlation Coeficient (ICC). Konsistensi internal dinilai dengan cronbach alpha. Construct validity dinilai dengan multi-trait scaling analysis. Validitas kriteria dinilai dengan melihat korelasi antara domain European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) dan EORTC QLQ-BR23 dengan Short Form 36(SF36).Hasil. Telah dilakukan pengambilan data terhadap 100 pasien kanker payudara yang menjalani terapi dari September - Oktober 2015. Nilai ICC (interval 1 jam) pada semua domain EORTC QLQ-BR23 sangat baik (ICC > 0,8). Terdapat penurunan nilai ICC (interval 30 hari) pada semua domain EORTC QLQ-BR23. Nilai cronbach alpha > 0,7 pada hampir semua domain EORTC QLQ-BR23 kecuali domain gejala lengan (Cronbach Alpha: 0,643). Multi-trait scaling analysis menunjukkan korelasi cukup tinggi antara skor butir pertanyaan dengan skor domainnya sendiri. Sedangkan hubungan butir pertanyaan dengan domain yang berbeda selalu mempunyai korelasi yang lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan domainnya sendiri. Pada uji validitas kriteria, didapatkan 19 korelasi dengan r > 0,3 antara domain EORTC QLQ-C30 dan EORTC QLQ-BR23 dengan SF36.Simpulan. EORTC QLQ-BR23 merupakan alat ukur yang valid dan reliabel  untuk menilai kualitas hidup pasien kanker payudara di Indonesia Kata Kunci: Kualitas Hidup, EORTC QLQ-BR23, Validitas, Reliabilitas, Kanker Payudara Validity and Reability Test of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast23 in Breast Cancer Patient on TreatmentIntroduction. Improved survival of breast cancer patients are not necessarily followed by improvement of quality of life. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) emphasize the importance of assessing the quality of life in cancer patients. Currently, in Indonesia, there has been no reliable and valid questionnaire to assess quality of life of breast cancer patients accurately. This study aims to prove that the EORTC QLQ-BR23 is valid and reliable measuring instrument used in Indonesia.Methods. This is a cross-sectional study. The study began with the EORTC QLQBR23 translated into Indonesian and then tested on 10 respondents. After that, The Indonesian version of EORTC QLQ-BR23 is used in the main study with a larger sample size. Test-retest was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha. Construct validity was assessed by multi-trait scaling analysis. The criteria validity assessed by looking at the correlation between domains European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cancer 30 (EORTC QLQC30) and EORTC QLQ-BR23 with Short Form 36 (SF36).Results. Data collection were done on 100 breast cancer patients on treatment from September to October 2015. ICC value (1 hour interval) in all domains of EORTC QLQ-BR23 is very good (ICC> 0.8). There is a decline in the value of ICC (30 days interval) in all domains of EORTC QLQ-BR23. Cronbach alpha values > 0.7 in almost all domains of EORTC QLQ-BR23 domain unless symptoms arm domain (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.643). Multi-trait scaling analysis showed a fairly high correlation between the scores of the questions with a score of his own domain. While the relationship of the questions with different domains always have a lower correlation than the domain itself. In criteria validity test, obtained 19 correlation with r > 0,3 between domains EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 with SF36.Conclusion. EORTC QLQ-BR23 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing quality of life of breast cancer patients in Indonesia


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252779
Author(s):  
Nuntaporn Karawekpanyawong ◽  
Kewalee Kaewkitikul ◽  
Benchalak Maneeton ◽  
Narong Maneeton ◽  
Sitthicha Siriaree

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence, associated factors and quality of life associated with depressive disorder in cervical cancer patients. Patients and methods This cross-sectional study was carried out in a gynecologic oncology clinic of a university hospital in Northern Thailand from October 2018 to August 2019. Two-hundred cervical cancer patients were screened for depressive disorder using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and psychiatrists interviewed eligible patients to confirm diagnoses. We measured the quality of life using questionnaires from the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer: Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Cervical Cancer Module 24 (EORTC QLQ-Cx24). Associated factors, including comorbidity, fatigue, and pain, were collected using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the eleven-item Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ 11), and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, respectively. Results Twenty-seven (13.5%) cervical cancer patients were diagnosed with depressive disorder by psychiatrists according to the DSM-5. Depressive disorder was related to a worse quality of life in these patients. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that depressive disorder among these patients was linked with these factors: high fatigue score (aOR: 1.35; CI: 1.18–1.53), high pain score (aOR: 1.25; CI: 1.02–1.54), no perception of social support, (aOR: 3.12; CI: 1.11–8.81), and no previous surgical treatment for cervical cancer (aOR: 2.99; CI: 1.08–8.29). Conclusion The depressive disorder prevalence was 13.5% in Northern Thai cervical cancer patients. In this demographic, cervical cancer patients—who reported high fatigue or pain scores, did not perceive social support, or had no previous cervical cancer surgery- were more likely to have depressive disorder.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasmine Davda ◽  
Hillary Kibet ◽  
Emmah Achieng ◽  
Lawrence Atundo ◽  
Truphena Komen

Abstract Background In oncology practice, eliciting the patient’s perspective on their quality of life (QOL) adds important information and value to their treatment and care. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is the most commonly used tool for this purpose but has not been validated in Kenya. The present study aimed to conduct a preliminary assessment of the QOL among Kenyan cancer patients and examine the psychometric properties of the tool in this population. One hundred patients with heterogeneous types of cancer were enrolled in this cross-sectional study between July and August 2019. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was administered to patients using either the English or Kiswahili official version. Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient demographics and clinical characteristics. The psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 were evaluated in terms of acceptability, internal consistency, and construct validity using statistical software packages, STATA and SPSS. Results The EORTC QLQ-C30 was found to be acceptable for use in our patient population as indicated by high compliance and low missing responses. Of the 100 patients, 66 were able to self-administer the questionnaire. The average time for completion was 13 min. Preliminary QOL assessment indicated an average QOL in Kenyan cancer patients (53 ± 27). Among the function scales, participants scored the lowest on the social function scale (51 ± 36) whereas among the symptom scales, participants scored the highest on the financial difficulties scale (79 ± 31). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient values ranged from 0.72–0.95, illustrating the reliability of the scales measured. Interscale correlations were statistically significant (p < 0.05), indicating clinical validity of the data collected. The magnitudes of the correlations between the physical functioning scale and the role functioning, pain, and fatigue scales were consistent with the values published in other studies across different geographical populations, further cross-validating the results from our study. Conclusion The results from this study provide important first insights into using EORTC QLQ-C30 in the Kenyan population. We conclude that the questionnaire is an acceptable, reliable, and valid instrument for measuring the QOL in cancer patients in Kenya and recommend its use in clinical practice.


Author(s):  
Radica Zivkovic Zaric ◽  
Marija Zivkovic Radojevic ◽  
Katarina Krasic ◽  
Jasmina Milovanovic ◽  
Slobodan Jankovic

Abstract Introduction: Cancer of the cervix has a progressive character and is one of the most significant public health problems in many countries. Our research aimed to translate EORTC QLQ CX 24 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer; Quality of life questionnaire-cervical cancer 24) from English to Serbian, to create essential cultural adaptations and to analyze psychometric properties of the translation in a model of female inpatients with cancer of the cervix. Method: The QLQ CX 24 was translated and adapted according to internationally established guidelines, and then tested on a sample of 100 Serbian females with cancer of the cervix. The testing was repeated three times on the same patients. We calculated the internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), criterion validity, convergent validity, and discriminative validity of the QLQ CX 24. We used factor analysis to discover the original construct. Results: The Serbian translation of QLQ CX 24 showed good internal consistency, showed satisfactory reliability, and temporal stability. In the first, when was rated by the investigators Cronbach’s alpha was 0.607, and one month later when the questionnaire also was rated by investigators Cronbach’s alpha was 0.696. When the scale was rated by females themselves Cronbach’s alpha was 0.802. Divergent as well as convergent validity tests had good results. The factorial analysis exposed six domains.Conclusion: The Serbian translation of QLQ CX 24 is a trustworthy and appropriate specific instrument for measuring the quality of life in females with cervical cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document