Feasibility and performance of a novel probe panel to detect somatic DNA copy number alterations in clinical specimens for predicting prostate cancer progression

The Prostate ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (14) ◽  
pp. 1253-1262
Author(s):  
Wennuan Liu ◽  
Jun Hou ◽  
Jacqueline Petkewicz ◽  
Rong Na ◽  
Chi‐Hsiung Wang ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-ji WEN ◽  
Wen-ming CONG ◽  
Ai-zhong WANG ◽  
Song-qin HE ◽  
Hong-mei JIANG ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
Georgiana Gug ◽  
Caius Solovan

Background and Objectives: Mycosis fungoides (MF) and large plaque parapsoriasis (LPP) evolution provide intriguing data and are the cause of numerous debates. The diagnosis of MF and LPP is associated with confusion and imprecise definition. Copy number alterations (CNAs) may play an essential role in the genesis of cancer out of genes expression dysregulation. Objectives: Due to the heterogeneity of MF and LPP and the scarcity of the cases, there are an exceedingly small number of studies that have identified molecular changes in these pathologies. We aim to identify and compare DNA copy number alterations and gene expression changes between MF and LPP to highlight the similarities and the differences between these pathologies. Materials and Methods: The patients were prospectively selected from University Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology Timișoara, Romania. From fresh frozen skin biopsies, we extracted DNA using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. The use of SNP array for copy number profiling is a promising approach for genome-wide analysis. Results: After reviewing each group, we observed that the histograms generated for chromosome 1–22 were remarkably similar and had a lot of CNAs in common, but also significant differences were seen. Conclusions: This study took a step forward in finding out the differences and similarities between MF and LPP, for a more specific and implicitly correct approach of the case. The similarity between these two pathologies in terms of CNAs is striking, emphasizing once again the difficulty of approaching and differentiating them.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1172-1183.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara B. Shih ◽  
May Tassabehji ◽  
James S. Watson ◽  
Angus D. McGrouther ◽  
Ardeshir Bayat

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarit I. Tiirikainen ◽  
Brian P. Mullaney ◽  
Elizabeth A. Holly ◽  
Maria G. Pallavicini ◽  
Ronald H. Jensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document