A rapid insect species identification system using mini‐barcode pyrosequencing

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 1222-1227
Author(s):  
Chia‐Hung Hsieh ◽  
Chin‐Gi Huang ◽  
Wen‐Jer Wu ◽  
Hurng‐Yi Wang
The Analyst ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (21) ◽  
pp. 6438-6446
Author(s):  
Hideaki Kanayama ◽  
Te Ma ◽  
Satoru Tsuchikawa ◽  
Tetsuya Inagaki

From the viewpoint of combating illegal logging and examining wood properties, there is a contemporary demand for a wood species identification system.


1990 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 259 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Lavery ◽  
D Staples

Allozyme electrophoresis was used to identify the postlarvae of two species of tiger prawns, Penaeus esculentus and P. semisulcatus, from the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. The two species were examined for genetic differences at 39 loci, in three developmental stages (adult, juvenile and postlarval). One locus, Gpi, was suitable for the routine species identification of postlarvae. The electrophoretic identification system developed, when applied to the identification of postlarvae taken by field sampling, was more reliable and efficient than standard morphological techniques.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 967-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heshalini Rajagopal ◽  
Anis Salwa Mohd Khairuddin ◽  
Norrima Mokhtar ◽  
Azlin Ahmad ◽  
Rubiyah Yusof

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E Meyer ◽  
Garret F Coffman ◽  
Kathryn Conroy ◽  
Stephen L Young

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 10133-10147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Otero ◽  
Eva Rodriguez ◽  
Jacint Ventura

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nayna Vyas-Patel ◽  
John D Mumford

AbstractA number of image recognition systems have been specifically formulated for the individual recognition of large animals. These programs are versatile and can easily be adapted for the identification of smaller individuals such as insects. The Interactive Individual Identification System, I3S Classic, initially produced for the identification of individual whale sharks was employed to distinguish between different species of mosquitoes and bees, utilising the distinctive vein pattern present on insect wings. I3S Classic proved to be highly effective and accurate in identifying different species and sexes of mosquitoes and bees, with 80% to100% accuracy for the majority of the species tested. The sibling species Apis mellifera and Apis mellifera carnica were both identified with100% accuracy. Bombus terrestris terrestris and Bombus terrestris audax; were also identified and separated with high degrees of accuracy (90% to 100% respectively for the fore wings and 100% for the hind wings). When both Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Anopheles arabiensis were present in the database, they were identified with 94% and 100% accuracy respectively, allowing for a morphological and non-molecular method of sorting between these members of the sibling complex. Flat, not folded and entire, rather than broken, wing specimens were required for accurate identification. Only one wing image of each sex was required in the database to retrieve high levels of accurate results in the majority of species tested. The study describes how I3S was used to identify different insect species and draws comparisons with the use of the CO1 algorithm. As with CO1, I3S Classic proved to be suitable software which could reliably be used to aid the accurate identification of insect species. It is emphasised that image recognition for insect species should always be used in conjunction with other identifying characters in addition to the wings, as is the norm when identifying species using traditional taxonomic keys.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document