Verifying and Validating Quantitative Systems Pharmacology and
            In Silico
            Models in Drug Development: Current Needs, Gaps, and Challenges

AbstractQuantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) is an important approach in pharmaceutical research and development that facilitates in silico generation of quantitative mechanistic hypotheses and enables in silico trials. As demonstrated by applications from numerous industry groups and interest from regulatory authorities, QSP is becoming an increasingly critical component in clinical drug development. With rapidly evolving computational tools and methods, QSP modeling has achieved important progress in pharmaceutical research and development, including for heart failure (HF). However, various challenges exist in the QSP modeling and clinical characterization of HF. Machine/deep learning (ML/DL) methods have had success in a wide variety of fields and disciplines. They provide data-driven approaches in HF diagnosis and modeling, and offer a novel strategy to inform QSP model development and calibration. The combination of ML/DL and QSP modeling becomes an emergent direction in the understanding of HF and clinical development new therapies. In this work, we review the current status and achievement in QSP and ML/DL for HF, and discuss remaining challenges and future perspectives in the field.

Download Full-text

A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model of the Pathophysiology and Treatment of COVID-19 Predicts Optimal Timing of Pharmacological Interventions

10.1101/2021.12.07.21267277 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Rohit Rao ◽

Cynthia J. Musante ◽

Richard Allen

Keyword(s):

Immune Response ◽

Viral Load ◽

Symptom Onset ◽

In Silico ◽

Clinical Trial Design ◽

Baseline Viral Load ◽

Optimal Timing ◽

Systems Pharmacology ◽

Quantitative Systems Pharmacology ◽

Wide Range

AbstractA quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model of the pathogenesis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection can streamline and accelerate the development of novel medicines to treat COVID-19. Simulation of clinical trials allows in silico exploration of the uncertainties of clinical trial design and can rapidly inform their protocols. We previously published a preliminary model of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. To further our understanding of COVID-19 and treatment we significantly updated the model by matching a curated dataset spanning viral load and immune responses in plasma and lung. We identified a population of parameter sets to generate heterogeneity in pathophysiology and treatment and tested this model against published reports from interventional SARS-CoV-2 targeting Ab and anti-viral trials. Upon generation and selection of a virtual population, we match both the placebo and treated responses in viral load in these trials. We extended the model to predict the rate of hospitalization or death within a population. Via comparison of the in silico predictions with clinical data, we hypothesize that the immune response to virus is log-linear over a wide range of viral load. To validate this approach, we show the model matches a published subgroup analysis, sorted by baseline viral load, of patients treated with neutralizing Abs. By simulating intervention at different timepoints post infection, the model predicts efficacy is not sensitive to interventions within five days of symptom onset, but efficacy is dramatically reduced if more than five days pass post-symptom onset prior to treatment.

Download Full-text