Ultrasound education in the context of COVID ‐19: challenges and way forward

Author(s):  
G. E. Chalouhi ◽  
M. Mouanness ◽  
R. S. Abu‐Rustum ◽  
M. Tolsgaard
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
N Stauffert ◽  
D Hempel ◽  
J Schleifer ◽  
F Recker ◽  
T Schröder ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Felipe González-Seguel ◽  
Juan José Pinto-Concha ◽  
Francisco Ríos-Castro ◽  
Alexis Silva-Gutiérrez ◽  
Agustín Camus-Molina ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000888
Author(s):  
Dane Vishnubala ◽  
Katherine Rose Marino ◽  
Margaret Kathryn Pratten ◽  
Andy Pringle ◽  
Steffan Arthur Griffin ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo explore the services National Health Service (NHS)-based sport and exercise medicine (SEM) clinics can offer, and the barriers to creating and integrating SEM services into the NHS.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were undertaken to collect data from identified ‘stakeholders’. Stakeholders were identified as individuals who had experience and knowledge of the speciality of SEM and the NHS. An inductive thematic analysis approach was taken to analyse the data.ResultsN=15 stakeholder interviews. The management of musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries (both acute and chronic) and concussion were highlighted as the two key services that SEM clinics can offer that would most benefit the NHS. MSK ultrasound was also mentioned by all stakeholders as a critical service that SEM clinics should provide. While exercise medicine is an integral part of SEM, SEM clinics should perhaps not have a heavy exercise medicine focus. The key barriers to setting up SEM clinics were stated to be convincing NHS management, conflict with other specialities and a lack of awareness of the speciality.ConclusionThe management of acute MSK injuries and concussion should be the cornerstone of SEM services, ideally with the ability to provide MSK ultrasound. Education of others on the speciality of SEM, confirming consistent ‘unique selling points’ of SEM clinics and promoting how SEM can add value to the NHS is vital. If the successful integration of SEM into the NHS is not widely achieved, we risk the NHS not receiving all the benefits that SEM can provide to the healthcare system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S98
Author(s):  
L. Tivendale ◽  
D. El-Ansary ◽  
A. Royse ◽  
C. Royse ◽  
D. Canty

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-120
Author(s):  
Louis W. Lucas ◽  
Franklin N. Tessler ◽  
Mark E. Lockhart ◽  
Felix A. Hester ◽  
Cheri L. Canon
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e78-e86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Steinmetz ◽  
Octavian Dobrescu ◽  
Sharon Oleskevich ◽  
John Lewis

Background: This study was carried out to determine the extent and characteristics of bedside ultrasound teaching in medical schools across Canada.Methods: A cross-sectional, survey-based study was used to assess undergraduate bedside ultrasound education in the 17 accredited medical schools in Canada. The survey, consisting of 19 questions was pilot-tested, web-based, and completed over a period of seven months in 2014.Results:  Approximately half of the 13 responding medical schools had integrated bedside ultrasound teaching into their undergraduate curriculum. The most common trends in undergraduate ultrasound teaching related to duration (1-5 hours/year in 50% of schools), format (practical and theoretical in 67% of schools), and logistics (1:4 instructor to student ratio in 67% of schools). The majority of responding vice-deans indicated that bedside ultrasound education should be integrated into the medical school curriculum (77%), and cited a lack of ultrasound machines and infrastructure as barriers to integration.Conclusions: This study documents the current characteristics of undergraduate ultrasound education in Canada.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. e11-e12
Author(s):  
Austin S. Meggitt ◽  
David P. Way ◽  
Maya S. Iyer ◽  
John D. Mahan ◽  
Delia Gold

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document