scholarly journals Hypophosphataemia after intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose—Real world experience from a tertiary centre in the UK

GastroHep ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos C. Fragkos ◽  
Vinay Sehgal ◽  
Jennifer Rogers ◽  
Sithhipratha Arulrajan ◽  
Pranavan Pavanerathan ◽  
...  
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1341
Author(s):  
Oliver Phipps ◽  
Hafid O. Al-Hassi ◽  
Mohammed N. Quraishi ◽  
Edward A. Dickson ◽  
Jonathan Segal ◽  
...  

Iron deficiency anemia is a common complication of colorectal cancer and may require iron therapy. Oral iron can increase the iron available to gut bacteria and may alter the colonic microbiota. We performed an intervention study to compare oral and intravenous iron therapy on the colonic tumor-associated (on-tumor) and paired non-tumor-associated adjacent (off-tumor) microbiota. Anemic patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma received either oral ferrous sulphate (n = 16) or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (n = 24). On- and off-tumor biopsies were obtained post-surgery and microbial profiling was performed using 16S ribosomal RNA analysis. Off-tumor α- and β-diversity were significantly different between iron treatment groups. No differences in on-tumor diversity were observed. Off-tumor microbiota of oral iron-treated patients showed higher abundances of the orders Clostridiales, Cytophagales, and Anaeroplasmatales compared to intravenous iron-treated patients. The on-tumor microbiota was enriched with the orders Lactobacillales and Alteromonadales in the oral and intravenous iron groups, respectively. The on- and off-tumor microbiota associated with intravenous iron-treated patients infers increased abundances of enzymes involved in iron sequestration and anti-inflammatory/oncogenic metabolite production, compared to oral iron-treated patients. Collectively, this suggests that intravenous iron may be a more appropriate therapy to limit adverse microbial outcomes compared to oral iron.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Phipps ◽  
Hafid Omar Al-Hassi ◽  
Mohammed Nabil Quraishi ◽  
Edward A Dickson ◽  
Jonathan Segal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Iron deficiency anaemia is a common complication of colorectal cancer and may require iron therapy. Oral iron can increase iron available to gut bacteria and may alter the colonic microbiota. We performed an intervention study to compare oral and intravenous iron therapy on the colonic tumour-associated (on-tumour) and paired non-tumour-associated adjacent (off-tumour) microbiota. Anaemic patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma received either oral ferrous sulphate (n=16) or intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (n=24). On- and off-tumour biopsies were obtained post-surgery and microbial profiling was performed using 16S ribosomal RNA analysis.Results Off-tumour α- and β-diversity were significantly different between iron treatment groups. No differences in on-tumour diversity were observed. Off-tumour microbiota of oral iron-treated patients shows higher abundances of the orders Clostridiales, Cytophagales and Anaeroplasmatales compared to intravenous iron-treated patients. The on-tumour microbiota was enriched with the orders Lactobacillales and Alteromonadales in the oral and intravenous iron groups, respectively. The on- and off-tumour microbiota associated with intravenous iron-treated patients infers increased abundances of enzymes involved in iron sequestration and anti-inflammatory/oncogenic metabolite production, compared to oral iron-treated patients. Paired on- and off-tumour microbiota show large taxonomic differences in intravenous iron-treated patients and limited differences in oral iron-treated patients.Conclusion Oral iron shows a large shift in the off-tumour microbiota, but a more limited change in on-tumour microbiota. The on- and off-tumour microbiota in intravenous iron-treated patients infers a microbiota associated with anti-inflammatory and tumour protective pathways. Suggesting intravenous iron may be a more appropriate therapy to limit adverse microbial outcomes, compared to oral iron.Trial registration: NCT01701310. Registered 21 March 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01701310


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Theidel ◽  
Saku Väätäinen ◽  
Janne Martikainen ◽  
Erkki Soini ◽  
Thomas Hardt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Drozd ◽  
M Tkaczyszyn ◽  
K Wegrzynowska-Teodorczyk ◽  
M Kasztura ◽  
M Dziegala ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that intravenous (IV) iron therapy in iron-deficient patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) brings clinical benefits related to symptoms of the disease and exercise capacity. Mechanisms underlying beneficial effects of such repletion are still the subject of interest as this is not solely related to improved haematopoiesis (IV iron works also in non-anaemic subjects). In patients with chronic heart failure iron deficiency (ID) is linked with inflammatory processess but data regarding the impact of IV iron on inflammation is scarce. Purposes We evaluated whether IV iron therapy affects circulating biomarkers of pro-inflammatory state in men with HFrEF and concomitant ID. Methods This is the sub-analysis of the study to investigate the effects of IV ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on the functioning of skeletal muscles in men with HFrEF. For the purposes of current research we analyzed data of 20 men with HFrEF (median age 68 (62, 75 – in brackets interquartile ranges, respectively) years, LVEF: 30 (25, 35) %, ischaemic HF aetiology: 85%, NYHA class I/II/III: 30%/50%/20%) and ID (definition according to ESC guidelines - ferritin <100 ng/mL, or ferritin 100–299 ng/mL with transferrin saturation [TSAT] <20%) who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the 24-week therapy with IV FCM (dosing scheme as in the CONFIRM-HF trial) or saline (controls). The study was double-blinded. We used ELISA to evaluate different circulating pro-inflammatory biomarkers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], interleukin 6 [IL-6], interleukin 1 beta [IL-1β], interleukin 22 [IL-22]) at baseline and week 24. Results IV FCM therapy repleted iron stores in men with HFrEF as reflected by an increase in serum ferritin and TSAT, which was not seen in a control group. IV FCM therapy (as well as the saline administration) affected neither haemoglobin concentration nor parameters reflecting iron stores in red cells. Baseline serum ferritin was not related to hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-22 (all p>0.23). Baseline TSAT was related to hs-CRP (r=−0.47, p=0.02) but not other inflammatory biomarkers. Levels of hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-22 at week 0 were similar in subjects who received IV iron and controls (all p>0.22). Change from week 0 to week 24 adjusted for baseline value (delta W24-W0 as the percentage of W0) regarding IL-22 was lower in an active treatment arm as compared with saline (p=0.049) and there was a trend towards lower delta TNF-α in FCM group compared to saline (p=0.067). These findings were not valid for other measured pro-inflammatory biomarkers. Conclusions In men with HFrEF and concomitant ID intravenous iron therapy with FCM affects biomarkers of pro-inflammatory state. Clinical relevance of this finding requires further translational research. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This research was funded by the National Science Centre (Poland) grant allocated on the basis of the decision number DEC-2012/05/E/NZ5/00590


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document