Artifact-Free Quantification of Free 3-Chlorotyrosine, 3-Bromotyrosine, and 3-Nitrotyrosine in Human Plasma by Electron Capture–Negative Chemical Ionization Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2002 ◽  
Vol 304 (2) ◽  
pp. 275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Gaut ◽  
Jaeman Byun ◽  
Hung D. Tran ◽  
Jay W. Heinecke
2008 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. ACI.S1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Raina ◽  
Patricia Hall

A comparison of detection limits of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in selected ion monitoring (SIM) with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode with both electron ionization (EI) and negative-ion chemical ionization (NCI) are presented for over 50 pesticides ranging from organochlorines (OCs), organophosphorus pesticides (OPs) and pre-emergent herbicides used in the Canadian prairies (triallate, trifluralin, ethalfluralin). The developed GC-EI/SIM, GC-NCI/SIM, and GC-NCI/SRM are suitable for the determination of pesticides in air sample extracts at concentrations <100 pg µL-1 (< 100 pg m-3 in air). No one method could be used to analyze the range of pre-emergent herbicides, OPs, and OCs investigated. In general GC-NCI/SIM provided the lowest method detection limits (MDLs commonly 2.5-10 pg µL-1) along with best confirmation (<25% RSD of ion ratio), while GC-NCI/SRM is recommended for use where added selectivity or confirmation is required (such as parathion-ethyl, tokuthion, carbofenothion). GC-EI/SRM at concentration < 100 pg µL-1 was not suitable for most pesticides. GC-EI/SIM was more prone to interference issues than NCI methods, but gave good sensitivity (MDLs 1-10 pg µL-1) for pesticides with poor NCI response (OPs: sulfotep, phorate, aspon, ethion, and OCs: alachlor, aldrin, perthane, and DDE, DDD, DDT).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document