How TRURL Evolves Multiagent Worlds for Social Interaction Analysis

Author(s):  
Takao Terano ◽  
Setsuya Kurahashi ◽  
Ushio Minami
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Izzatunnisa Izzatunnisa ◽  
Baiq Asma Nufida ◽  
Hulyadi Hulyadi

This research target was toidentify the influence of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type of Cooperative Learning Model accompanied with LearningTogether (LT) to student social interaction andstudy result. This was quasi experimental with post-test only control group design. Research subject was 63 student of 10th grade who was divided onto 35 student of experiment group and 28 student of control group. Experiment group was learned by Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) accompanied with LearningTogether (LT) and control group by conventional expository model. There were instrument on this research: (1) treatment instrument consist of Syllabus, RPP (teaching plant), and LKS (work sheet); (2) evaluation instrument consist of RPP observation sheet, social interaction questionnaire, social interaction observation sheet, and achievement test. Data was collected by observation, questionnaire, and test technique. Data was analyzed by descriptive analysis and independent sample t-test through SPSS 16.0 for windows as hypothetic test. Based on questionnaire, student social interaction analysis result showed enhancement between before and after treatment, from 71.67 % to 75.76 %, and based on direct observation, 67.50 %, on good category. Student study result enhancement analysis result was showed by their classical complete study, form 8.57 % to 94.28%, and t-test of study result was divine significance value 0.000 (<0.05), so that Ho was denied and Ha was accepted. So, it was concluded that: (1) Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type of Cooperative Learning Model accompanied with LearningTogether (LT) was influence to student social interaction; (2) Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) type of Cooperative Learning Model accompanied with LearningTogether (LT) was influence to student study result.


Zoo Biology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-333
Author(s):  
Paula Sánchez–Hernández ◽  
Anastasia Krasheninnikova ◽  
Javier Almunia ◽  
Miguel Molina–Borja

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-113
Author(s):  
Thomas Martine ◽  
Boris H J M Brummans ◽  
François Cooren

Abstract This paper presents a view of interaction analysis that departs from the intersubjectivist assumptions that underlie its ethnomethodological tradition. Adopting a pragmatist perspective, we propose to treat phenomena as being composed of relations; that is, as being constituted by passing through various things and beings. Extending Latour’s work on modernity, we argue that interaction analysts aim to capture social phenomena at the junction between two modes of existence or two manners of passing through others. In the mode of subsistence, social phenomena are (re)produced by continuously passing through new elements. In the mode of reference, social phenomena sustain themselves by going back and forth between various inscriptions. Based on a case study, we show how the movement of subsistence always eludes that of reference, and how analysts can only move along with this movement by limiting their corroboration techniques, both in number and in range. Thus, this paper makes an important contribution to research on language and social interaction, as well as science and technology studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document