Michael Mann

2008 ◽  
pp. 338-354
Author(s):  
Ralph Schroeder
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Ralph Schroeder

This chapter gives an account of Weber’s concept of rationalization and how it has been used by subsequent social thinkers. The argument of the chapter is that rationalization is a central thread in Weber’s thought, and it explicates his ideas about how this process works in the realms of culture, the economy, and politics. It also discusses some thinkers who have made use of his ideas, including Ernest Gellner, Randall Collins, and Michael Mann. In Weber’s time, a major debate was about the rise and distinctiveness of the West. More recently, the debate has shifted to the causes and consequences of globalization. The final part of the chapter locates Weberian ideas about rationalization, and its limits, in this larger debate.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-510
Author(s):  
Isaac Ariail Reed

Este artigo se debruça sobre o par analítico poder-causalidade com o objetivo de tecer um comentário sobre as dimensões relacional, discursiva e performática de poder. Cada uma dessas dimensões de poder está enraizada em um diferente entendimento de causalidade social: realista-relacional, disucursiva-hermenêutica, e performática-pragmática. Para os fins de uma análise empírica, será proposto um cruzamento entre esse modelo dimensional e a clássica tipologia das fontes de poder desenvolvida por Michael Mann e outros, para que dessa forma a pesquisa sociológica sobre poder se arme com um aparato conceitual mais sólido e ganhe mais complexidade e efetividade em suas explicações. O exemplo que melhor ilustra o modelo que aqui será debatido é uma imagem retirada da sociologia histórico-comparativa: a Queda da Bastilha e suas causas e consequências. Uma série de questões de pesquisa será levantada no texto com o objetivo de investigar a autonomia relativa do poder performativo. Por último, será esboçada uma aproximação entre o modelo aqui analisado e as teorias sociológicas de poder, incluindo os argumentos de Steven Lukes, Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, entre outros.


2018 ◽  
pp. 255-270
Author(s):  
Steven C. Hertler ◽  
Aurelio José Figueredo ◽  
Mateo Peñaherrera-Aguirre ◽  
Heitor B. F. Fernandes ◽  
Michael A. Woodley of Menie
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Matthew Lange

This chapter examines the link between modernity and ethnic violence. It begins with an overview of the origins and forms of modernity as well as the factors that caused the processes constituting modernity to develop in different ways. It then considers opposing arguments about the impact of modernity on ethnic violence, focusing on the classic modernist view, which contends that modernity promotes peace, and the revised modernist view, which counters that modernity increases violence. Joseph Conrad's novella Heart of Darkness offers a clear example of the classic position that equates modernity with peace. In particular, Conrad linked ruthless violence to primitivism and peaceful social order to modernity. The revised modernist position is exemplified by the works of Hannah Arendt, Michael Mann, James Scott, and Andreas Wimmer. The chapter concludes with a discussion of quantitative and qualitative evidence that lends support to the revised modernist view.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document