Interdependence of Domestic and International Economic Systems

1989 ◽  
pp. 68-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Röpke
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
Economic Systems

Introduction

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-97
Author(s):  
Adam Teller
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
International Trade ◽  
Eastern Europe ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Ottoman Empire ◽  
Slave Trade ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Jewish Women ◽  
Market Conditions ◽  
The Mediterranean

This chapter provides an overview of the Polish–Lithuanian Jews who were taken captive to be ransomed or sold into slavery. Once captured, these Jewish women and men found themselves trapped in two major international economic systems of the period. The first was the international trade in Ukrainian, Polish, Russian, and Circassian captives carried out by the Crimean Tatars with the support of the Ottoman Empire. The second economic system was piracy in the Mediterranean. Two major issues are at the heart of the discussion on the fates of these Jewish captives. The first concerns the slave trade itself and how its market conditions shaped the fate of the captured Jews. The second deals with the effort to ransom the Jewish captives from eastern Europe and is focused on the transregional Jewish philanthropic networks that raised huge sums and transported them the long distances to the slave market, examining them in terms of both their form and their function.

Methodological Bases of the Agriculture Competitiveness Assessing

2019 ◽  
pp. 66-78
Author(s):  
Olha V. Khodakivska ◽  
Nataliia I. Patyka ◽  
A. Gargasas
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Comparative Characteristic ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
The One ◽  
Different Levels

In the article the methodological basis of assessing competitiveness are substantiated, their content is defined, the types are systematized, which made it possible to determine the methodological approaches to developing tools for assessing the level of Ukraine’s agriculture competitiveness in the context of international economic integration. It has been established that the assessment of economic systems competitiveness of different levels (country, region, region, enterprise, product) has much in common – the same analysis methods, similar research algorithms, related indicators are used. This is especially characteristic for studies of the industry competitiveness, since the industry market positions are, on the one hand, market positions of the aggregate of its economic entities or manufactured goods, and on the other hand, positions that form the countries and regions competitiveness. It has been proved that the methodological basis for assessing the agriculture competitiveness as an industry of the national economy involves two aspects: firstly, competitiveness is a comparative characteristic of a subject entering the market, therefore it can be assessed only in comparison with other similar subjects or taking into account their market positions; secondly, the assessment on different markets may coincide with the methods used, but it should differ in the indicators, criteria, assessment indicators, which are used, with the possibility of mixing, the partial interchangeability and complementarity of these groups. Criteria for assessing the agriculture competitiveness in the context of international economic integration, which are generally accepted in world practice, are systematized, and which should be considered in three dimensions: the macro level, the meso-level, and the indicators of foreign economic activity. An algorithm for assessing the agriculture competitiveness is proposed. Key words: competitiveness, criteria, evaluation method, indicator, agriculture.

Interface 2.0 in Rules on State-Owned Enterprises: A Comparative Institutional Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-663
Author(s):  
Ru Ding
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
The United States ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Consensus Building ◽  
The Public ◽  
Economic Law ◽  
International Economic Law ◽  
Public Body ◽  
Trading Partners

ABSTRACT Interface mechanisms in international economic law refer to international, regional, or domestic legal instruments that resolve problems arising from differences in economic systems. The existing interface mechanism regarding disciplining state-owned enterprises (SOEs)’ activities remains unclear and has led to disputes and a divergence of views among major trading partners, most notably between the United States and China. The underlying cause is the lack of an analytical framework to understand SOEs from a comparative view that may foster consensus-building discussions. This article constructs a comparative institutional framework to understand SOEs in a variety of market economy settings, which inspires new approaches in analyzing SOE-related legal issues in international economic law. This article takes the ‘public body’ issue in the WTO and the new disciplines on SOEs as examples, demonstrating that a type of activity-based approach can be a new interface mechanism for international rules on SOEs.

International Economic Systems

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Witt ◽  
Jack Helmuth ◽  
Christopher Kelly ◽  
Michael Witt ◽  
Jack Helmuth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
Economic Systems

Death and Transfiguration in the Third World

Worldview ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irving Louis Horowitz
Keyword(s):  
International Economic ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Third World ◽  
Economic Cooperation ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
International Conference ◽  
The Third ◽  
International Economic Cooperation ◽  
The United Nations ◽  
The Third World

The Conference on International Economic Cooperation has all the appearances of a floating crap game: After the windup of this eighteenmonth Paris conference it moves over to UNCTAD, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. This points up the need for the U.N. to sponsor a permanent international clearinghouse on the exchange of data and the pricing of world goods and commodities. It would function as a sort of securities and commodities exchange commission that remains sensitive to the varieties of economic systems and mixtures, but is somehow able to establish guidelines on the relative values of goods, services, and commodities. Such an institutionbuilding process was a major recommendation of the Second International Conference on Environment and Society.

Comparative Economic Systems

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Conklin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Systems
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document