Public Sector Borrowing: Policy and Practice

2002 ◽  
pp. 267-292
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Policy And Practice

scholarly journals The Problem of Success and Failure in Public-private Innovation Partnerships

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
JONATHAN HAMMOND ◽  
SIMON BAILEY ◽  
OZ GORE ◽  
KATH CHECKLAND ◽  
SARAH DARLEY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Policy Maker ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Policy Success ◽  
Political Effects ◽  
Innovation Project ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Test Beds

Abstract Public-Private Innovation Partnerships (PPIPs) are increasingly used as a tool for addressing ‘wicked’ public sector challenges. ‘Innovation’ is, however, frequently treated as a ‘magic’ concept: used unreflexively, taken to be axiomatically ‘good’, and left undefined within policy programmes. Using McConnell’s framework of policy success and failure and a case study of a multi-level PPIP in the English health service (NHS Test Beds), this paper critically explores the implications of the mobilisation of innovation in PPIP policy and practice. We highlight how the interplay between levels (macro/micro and policy maker/recipient) can shape both emerging policies and their prospects for success or failure. The paper contributes to an understanding of PPIP success and failure by extending McConnell’s framework to explore inter-level effects between policy and innovation project, and demonstrating how the success of PPIP policy cannot be understood without recognising the particular political effects of ‘innovation’ on formulation and implementation.

The role of operations management in public sector policy and practice alignment: a local government analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 988-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley-Ann Hazlett ◽  
Rodney McAdam ◽  
Tim Walker
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Operations Management ◽  
Policy And Practice

scholarly journals Commission incomplete: exploring the new model for purchasing public services from the third sector

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES REES ◽  
ROBIN MILLER ◽  
HEATHER BUCKINGHAM
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Third Sector ◽  
Community Mental Health Services ◽  
Halfway House ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Service Areas ◽  
The Status ◽  
Third Sector Organisations ◽  
The Uk

AbstractThe concept of commissioning has risen in prominence in recent years as a result of ongoing reforms to the funding and delivery of public services in the UK. The model of commissioning constructed by policy has however been overlaid on existing practices, which themselves differ between different service areas. This paper, focusing on commissioning of third sector organisations (TSOs) in the field of community mental health services, shows that its introduction has not led to the straightforward public sector ‘marketisation’ that advocates desire or that critics fear. Instead, commissioning has led to an indeterminate outcome or ‘halfway house’ position in which the status and role of commissioning remains somewhat muddled – both internally to participants within public sector organisations and externally in terms of the experience of the interface by TSOs. We found that commissioning as it is actually practiced remains contested and political – it is a highly relational process dependent on personal practices and skills and on personal relationships between stakeholders – and is therefore not fully managerialised or marketised. This has implications for the policy and practice of commissioning and the interpretation of more ‘open’ public services.

Editorial: What Works? The Role of Evidence in Public Sector Policy and Practice

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huw T. O. Davies ◽  
Sandra M. Nutley ◽  
Peter C. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
What Works

scholarly journals Mechanisms of constraint: a clinical inquiry of digital infrastructuring in municipalities

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jwan Khisro ◽  
Tomas Lindroth ◽  
Johan Magnusson
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Research Question ◽  
National Level ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Digital Government ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Digital Infrastructure ◽  
Infrastructure Policy ◽  
Public Sector Organizations ◽  
Generative Mechanisms

Purpose The purpose of this study is to contribute to research concerning the role of digital infrastructure in digital government. This is done by answering the research question: how does digital infrastructuring constrain ambidexterity in public sector organizations? Design/methodology/approach The research is designed as a clinical inquiry in a large Swedish municipality, involving data collection in the form of interviews and internal documents. The method of analysis involves both exploring generative mechanisms in digital infrastructuring and theorizing on the findings based on previous literature. Findings The findings identify four generative mechanisms through which stability and change in digital infrastructuring constrain ambidexterity in terms of both efficiency (exploitation) and innovation (exploration). Research limitations/implications This study’s limitations are related to international and intersectoral transferability and risks associated with its approach to clinical inquiry. The main implications are its contribution to the literature on how stability counteracts not only innovation but also efficiency and how change counteracts not only efficiency but also innovation. Practical implications This study identifies clear generative mechanisms that should be avoided by managers striving for digital government, and it offers clear recommendations for said managers regarding how to avoid them. Social implications This study offers implications for national-level digital infrastructure policy and contributes to efforts to increase the capabilities of digital government. Originality/value As two of the four identified generative mechanisms are novel contributions, this study offers a concrete addition to existing research. This study has resulted in factual change in the studied organization as well as at the national level through successful dissemination of the findings for both policy and practice in other public sector organizations.

Brands Taking a Stand: Authentic Brand Activism or Woke Washing?

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Vredenburg ◽  
Sommer Kapitan ◽  
Amanda Spry ◽  
Joya A. Kemper
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Social Change ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Brand Equity ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Important Policy ◽  
Corporate Practice ◽  
Sociopolitical Issues

In today’s marketplace, consumers want brands to take a stand on sociopolitical issues. When brands match activist messaging, purpose, and values with prosocial corporate practice, they engage in authentic brand activism, creating the most potential for social change and the largest gains in brand equity. In contrast, brands that detach their activist messaging from their purpose, values, and practice are enacting inauthentic brand activism through the practice of “woke washing,” potentially misleading consumers with their claims, damaging both their brand equity and potential for social change. First, the authors draw on theory to inform a typology of brand activism to determine how, and when, a brand engaging with a sociopolitical cause can be viewed as authentic. Second, a theory-driven framework identifies moderate, optimal incongruence between brand and cause as a boundary condition, showing how brand activists may strengthen outcomes in an increasingly crowded marketplace. Third, the authors explore important policy and practice implications for current and aspiring brand activists, from specific brand-level standards in marketing efforts to third-party certifications and public sector partnerships.

Public Sector Bargaining: Policy and Practice

1980 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER FEUILLE ◽  
JOHN C. ANDERSON
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Public Sector Bargaining

scholarly journals THE INTEGRATED REPORTING FRAMEWORK ACROSS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: A THEMATIC REVIEW

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 410-440
Author(s):  
Mona Othman ◽  
Norida Basnan ◽  
Azlina Ahmad ◽  
Mohd Fairuz Md Salleh
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Integrated Reporting ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Reporting Framework ◽  
Thematic Review ◽  
International Integrated Reporting Council ◽  
Key Aspects

Background and Purpose: The Integrated Reporting framework as emphasised by The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) in 2013 (revised 2021), was accepted as one of the mechanisms nationwide to enhance public accountability. However, far fewer studies examined the intersection of the Integrated Reporting (IR) framework and the public sector. Addressing the gap, reviews of the literature were presented synthesising the adoption of the IR framework across public administration.   Methodology: By drawing upon SCOPUS, Science Direct and Mendeley databases were employed to generate academic literature beginning in 2011 through 2020. Following the inclusion and exclusion processes, 23 articles were selected and analysed by using ATLAS.ti 8.   Findings: The findings of the review were discussed qualitatively and quantitatively. Particular discerning were the qualitative findings; the findings outlined insights into key developments on the IR framework across the following groups, namely, ‘Fundamental Concepts’, ‘Guiding Principles’, and ‘Content Elements’. Key aspects of challenges concerning the adoption of existing frameworks in public administration were discussed.   Contributions: Future research might better consider developing a more appropriate IR framework for public administration, a framework that integrates policy and practice. By focusing on the academic literature emphasising the IR framework, academics, regulators, and reporting organisations could formulate appropriate strategies for public administration.   Keywords: Framework, integrated reporting, public sector, thematic review.   Cite as: Othman, M., Basnan, N., Ahmad, A., & Md Salleh, M. F. (2022). The integrated reporting framework across public administration: A thematic review. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(1), 410-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss1pp410-440

Public Sector Borrowing: Policy and Practice

1995 ◽  
pp. 239-261
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Bailey
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Policy And Practice
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document