After-School Prevention Programs for At-Risk Students

Author(s):  
Elaine Clanton Harpine
2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Lauer ◽  
Motoko Akiba ◽  
Stephanie B. Wilkerson ◽  
Helen S. Apthorp ◽  
David Snow ◽  
...  

Schools and districts are adopting out-of-school-time (OST) programs such as after-school programs and summer schools to supplement the education of low-achieving students. However, research has painted a mixed picture of their effectiveness. To clarify OST impacts, this synthesis examined research on OST programs for assisting at-risk students in reading and/or mathematics. Researchers analyzed 35 OST studies that employed control or comparison groups and met other inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses indicated small but statistically significant positive effects of OST on both reading and mathematics student achievement and larger positive effect sizes for programs with specific characteristics such as tutoring in reading. Whether the OST program took place after school or during the summer did not make a difference in effectiveness.


Author(s):  
Lee Yong Tay ◽  
Cher Ping Lim

This chapter documents how a group of 14 academically at-risk Primary 5 students have been engaged in academic related tasks in an after-school program mediated by a game-like 3D multi-user virtual environment (MUVE), Quest Atlantis (QA). The case study explores the possibilities and potentials of using the game-like 3D MUVE for the re-engagement of this group of academically at-risk students. From the observation notes, interviews with the students and students’ activities in the MUVE, the two main elements in the MUVE that have been found to engage the students are: ‘play and fun’ and ‘recognition and affirmation of performance.’ However, these engaging elements alone could not purposefully engage these students. Non-ICT activities such as orientation tasks, support by teachers, and the careful selection of authentic assignments are necessary to further enhance their engagement with their learning.


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Hock ◽  
Kim A. Pulvers ◽  
Donald D. Deshler ◽  
Jean B. Schumaker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document