Estimating Phytoplankton Growth Rates in the Central Oligotrophic Oceans

1980 ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard W. Eppley
1987 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 891-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Dorazio ◽  
James A. Bowers ◽  
John T. Lehman

2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (6) ◽  
pp. 1710-1716
Author(s):  
Allanah J. Paul ◽  
Lennart T. Bach

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1591
Author(s):  
Jennifer Pulsifer ◽  
Edward Laws

Phytoplankton growth rates and zooplankton grazing rates were estimated on 16 occasions over a period of 17 months in University Lake, a highly eutrophic lake on the campus of Louisiana State University. Phytoplankton growth rates and chlorophyll a concentrations averaged 1.0 ± 0.2 d−1 and 240 ± 120 mg m−3, respectively. Chlorophyll a concentrations were at or above the inflection point of the Holling type I curve that described the relationship between zooplankton grazing rates and chlorophyll a concentrations. In most cases, it was necessary to dilute lake water by more than a factor of 4 before zooplankton grazing rates became sensitive to chlorophyll a concentrations. Chlorophyll a concentrations were positively correlated with temperature and were roughly fourfold higher at 30 °C than at 15 °C. An analysis of the temperature dependence of the growth rates and grazing rates in this study and 87 other paired estimates of limnetic phytoplankton growth rates and zooplankton grazing rates revealed virtually identical temperature dependences of growth rates and grazing rates that were very similar to the temperature dependence predicted by the metabolic theory of ecology. Phytoplankton growth rates exceeded zooplankton grazing rates by 0.13 ± 0.05 d−1 at all temperatures over a temperature range of 8.5–31.5 °C. The Q10 for both phytoplankton growth rates and zooplankton grazing rates was 1.5 over that temperature range.


1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1269-1269
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Haney ◽  
George A. Jackson

1981 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Redalje ◽  
E. A. Laws

Author(s):  
Qian P. Li ◽  
Peter J. S. Franks ◽  
Michael R. Landry ◽  
Ralf Goericke ◽  
Andrew G. Taylor

1991 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Sager ◽  
Sumner Richman

The functional interaction of phytoplankton and zooplankton, expressed in terms of the numerical difference between phytoplankton growth rates per day (in situ,14C method) and zooplankton grazing rates per day (in situ feeding experiments), was studied along the trophic gradient in Green Bay, Lake Michigan. Growth–grazing differences increased with trophic conditions, averaging 0.08 for the water column in the meso-oligotrophic northern bay and 0.56 in the eutrophic southern bay for the summers of 1986, 1987, and 1988. Eutrophic conditions produced dominance of growth by large-size cyanobacteria and low grazing rates by microcrustaceans Small and occasionally negative growth–grazing differences in the meso-oligotrophic region were associated with dominance of larger cladocerans and calanoid copepods and small algal species Phytoplankton growth rates in the northern bay averaged about 28% those of the eutrophic region. A unimodal phytoplankton growth response to increased grazing was observed in the northern bay, suggesting variation in positive (growth stimulating) and negative (grazing losses) effects of zooplankton on the phytoplankton.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document