Simplified Method for the Determination of Total Dietary Fiber and its Soluble and Insoluble Fractions in Foods

1990 ◽  
pp. 283-293
Author(s):  
Betty W. Li ◽  
Maria S. Cardozo
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Simplified Method

Simplified Method for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Foods

1988 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1063-1064
Author(s):  
Betty W Li ◽  
Karen W Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Incubation Period ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Food Samples ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Studies ◽  
Simplified Method ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract A simplified method, based on the same principles as the AOAC enzymatic-gravimetric method for determining total dietary fiber (TDF) (43.A14-43.A20), has been tested on 12 food samples which had been used in other collaborative studies. TDF values obtained in our laboratory for these 2 methods were in good agreement (y = 0.96x + 0.39; r = 0.999). The simplified method uses a single incubation period and only 1 enzyme (amyloglucosidase), and thus yields smaller blank and ash corrections but a higher protein correction.

Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Foods and Food Products by Using a Single-Enzyme, Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method: Interlaboratory Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1440-1443
Author(s):  
Betty W Li
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Food Composition ◽  
Interlaboratory Study ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Simplified Method ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A simplified enzymatic-gravimetric method for total dietary fiber (TDF) determination has been published and used in the Food Composition Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Agriculture since 1988. This method gives comparable results to AOAC Official Methods 985.29 and 991.43 but the AOAC methods use 100°C (water bath) to gelatinize the sample and a combination of α-amylase and an amyloglucosidase to hydrolyze starches, whereas the simplified method incorporates an autoclaving step (121°C) for gelatinization followed by incubation with only amyloglucosidase. The simplified method omits protease hydrolysis and does not require any pH adjustment. Overall, the simplified method cuts cost and is less labor intensive. An interlaboratory study was conducted to validate this method. Blind duplicates of six sample (baked beans, corn bran, roasted peanuts, cooked potatoes, white bread with reduced calories, and cooked white rice) were sent to 11 laboratories. The reproducibility relative standard deviations of the TDF values (without outliers) ranged from 3.46 to 27.6%. The repeatability standard deviations ranged from 0.91 to 14.6%.

Determination of Total, Soluble, and Insoluble Dietary Fiber in Foods—Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, MES-TRIS Buffer: Collaborative Study

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo C Lee ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
Jonathan W De Vries
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Tris Buffer ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Heat Stable ◽  
Assay Precision

Abstract A joint AOAC/AACC (American Association of Cereal Chemists) collaborative study of methods for the determination of soluble, insoluble, and total dietary fiber (SDF, IDF, and TDF) was conducted with 11 participating laboratories. The assay Is based on a modification of the AOAC TDF method 985.29 and the SDF/IDF method collaboratively studied recently by AOAC. The principles of the method are the same as those for the AOAC dietary fiber methods 985.29 and 991.42, Including the use of the same 3 enzymes (heat-stable α-amylase, protease, and amyloglucosldase) and similar enzyme Incubation conditions. In the modification, minor changes have been made to reduce analysis time and to Improve assay precision: (1) MES-TRIS buffer replaces phosphate buffer; (2) one pH adjustment step Is eliminated; and (3) total volumes of reaction mixture and filtration are reduced. Eleven collaborators were sent 20 analytical samples (4 cereal and grain products, 3 fruits, and 3 vegetables) for duplicate blind analysis. The SDF, IDF, and TDF content of the foods tested ranged from 0.53 to 7.17, 0.59 to 60.53, and 1.12 to 67.56 g/100 g, respectively. The respective average RSDR values for SDF, IDF, and TDF determinations by direct measurements were 13.1, 5.2, and 4.5%. The TDF values calculated by summing SDF and IDF were in excellent agreement with the TDF values measured independently. The modification did not alter the method performance with regard to mean dietary fiber values, yet It generated lower assay variability compared with the unmodified methods. The method for SDF, IDF, and TDF (by summing SDF and IDF) has been adopted first action by AOAC International.

scholarly journals A Simplified Modification of the AOAC Official Method for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber Using Newly Developed Enzymes: Preliminary Interlaboratory Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro Kanaya ◽  
Shusaku Tada ◽  
Bunpei Mori ◽  
Rie Takahashi ◽  
Sachie Ikegami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Enzymatic Digestion ◽  
Interlaboratory Study ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Stabilizing Agents ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A preliminary interlaboratory study was conducted to evaluate the validity of the modified AOAC method for determination of total dietary fiber by Tada and Innami, in which the 3-step enzymatic digestion process in AOAC Method 991.43 is modified to a 2-step process without pH adjustment. Total dietary fiber contents in 8 representative foodstuffs were measured using both the original AOAC Method 991.43 and the modified method in 6 research facilities in Japan. Repeatability relative standard deviations, reproducibility relative standard deviations, and Horwitz ratio values from the modified method were equivalent to those from AOAC Method 991.43, except in the rice sample. However, this exceptional case shown in the modified method was entirely dissolved by the addition of α-amylase stabilizing agents. The modified method, which shortens the process of enzymatic digestion from 3 to 2 steps and in which only reaction temperature is adjusted under the same pH, was found not only to give accurate values comparable to the original method, but also to substantially reduce the labor required by the laboratory staff in the process of routine analysis. This study revealed that the validity of the modified method was further ensured by adding α-amylase stabilizing agents to the reaction system.

Importance of Cooking Temperature and Pancreatic Amylase in Determination of Dietary Fiber in Dried Legumes

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1444-1449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Mongeau ◽  
René Brassard
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Rapid Method ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Pancreatic Amylase ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Cooking Temperature ◽  
Navy Beans ◽  
Lima Beans ◽  
Cooking Conditions

Abstract Total dietary fiber (TDF) was measured in large lima, roman, black turtle, light red kidney, white navy, pinto, black-eyed, and soya beans and in chick peas by the Mongeau rapid method (A), the Prosky method (B), and the Lee method (C). When the samples were soaked and cooked according to package instructions (gentle boiling, 95°C), TDF values by method A were all within 19.7-22.1%, except for black-eyed beans (9.9%) and chick peas (11.3%) (g/100 g, cooked dry matter). For large lima beans (20.0-21.3%) and soya beans (19.2-19.7%), TDF values by methods A, B, and C were in agreement. For 7 samples, however, TDF values were up to 81% higher by method B (17.4-34.7%) and up to 122% higher by method C (21.1-39.8%) than those by method A (P ≤ 0.01). For 6 legumes, TDF values by method C were 15-28% higher (P ≤ 0.013) than by method B. White navy beans were analyzed also after different cooking conditions, varying from no cooking to autoclaving for 15 min at 120°C. TDF values by method A were independent from cooking conditions and remained between 20.2 and 22.4%. For navy beans cooked at 95°C, TDF values by method B (up to 34.7 ± 1.4%) and C (up to 39.8 ± 0.3%) were unpredictable, but autoclaving at 120°C reduced them to about 22%. Incorporation of a pan-creatic amylase in methods B and C consistently decreased the aforementioned analytical discrepancies, as did the absence of cooking. Only autoclaving (for at least 15 min at 120°C) fully restored agreement among methods A-C.

scholarly journals Determination of Total Dietary Fiber in Selected Foods Containing Resistant Maltodextrin by a Simplified Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method and Liquid Chromatography: Interlaboratory Study in China

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boqiang Fu ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Jean Michel Roturier ◽  
Zhiyu Tang ◽  
Huan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Interlaboratory Study ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Modified Method ◽  
Resistant Maltodextrin ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
Aoac Official Method

Abstract An interlaboratory study was conducted in China to validate the modified AOAC Official Method 2001.03 for the determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods containing resistant maltodextrin (RMD), which will be adopted as the National Standard Method of China. The kind of buffer solution, the volume of filtrate evaporation, the volume of eluent for desalting and residual solution after evaporation, etc. were modified, which had been proved to have acceptable accuracy and precision in the routine assay. TDF contents in 3 representative foods and 2 kinds of RMD ingredient (i.e., NUTRIOSE 06 and NUTRIOSE 10) were measured using the modified method in 6 eligible laboratories representing commercial, industrial, and governmental laboratories in China. The results of the interlaboratory study indicated that the intralaboratory repeatability, interlaboratory reproducibility, and precision of the modified method are adequate for reliable analysis of TDF in food containing RMD, as well as resistant dextrin. Compared to AOAC Official Method 2001.03, the modified method is time- and cost-saving.

Urea Enzymatic Dialysis Procedure for Determination of Total Dietary Fiber

1989 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-681
Author(s):  
Joseph L Jeraci ◽  
Betty A Lewis ◽  
J Peter ◽  
Van J Soest ◽  
James B Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Crude Protein ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
New Method ◽  
Locust Bean Gum ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Locust Bean

Abstract A method that uses urea and enzymes for determination of total dietary fiber (TDF) in foods has been developed and compared with the AOAC enzymatic-gravimetric method (43.A14-43.A20). In the evaluation, results for crude protein and ash contamination were higher by the AOAC method, particularly for samples that form gels during ethanol precipitation. The new urea enzymatic dialysis (UED) method quantitatively recovered, with less variation, more of the purified and semipurified dietary fiber products. TDF recoveries for carboxymethylcellulose and locust bean gum were 98% (SD 3.3) and 95% (SD 6.1) by the AOAC method and 99% (SD 1.0) and 100% (SD 0.6) by the UED method, respectively. The UED method was the more effective in removing starch. For kale samples, starch recovery was 3.5 and 0.2% from TDF residues obtained using the AOAC and UED methods, respectively. Differences were not significant among replicate values for determination of TDF in foods by the UED method (P >0.01). Preliminary studies suggest that the new method can separately determine soluble and insoluble dietary fiber. The data indicate that the UED method is more precise and accurate than the AOAC method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document