A New Collision Cross Section Set for Silane

1994 ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Nagpal ◽  
Alan Garscadden
1981 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-187
Author(s):  
S Bliman ◽  
S Dousson ◽  
R Geller ◽  
B Jacquot ◽  
D van Houtte

1950 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Amdur ◽  
D. E. Davenport ◽  
M. C. Kells

AIAA Journal ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1676-1677 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAMUEL V. SHELTON ◽  
WALTER O. CARLSON

1999 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Ring ◽  
Ron Naaman ◽  
Yinon Rudich

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Gabelica ◽  
Alexandre A. Shvartsburg ◽  
Carlos Afonso ◽  
Perdita E. Barran ◽  
Justin L. P. Benesch ◽  
...  

Here we present a guide on ion mobility mass spectrometry experiments, which covers both linear and nonlinear methods: what is measured, how the measurements are done, and how to report the results, including the uncertainties on mobility and collision cross section values. The guide aims to clarify some possibly confusing concepts, and the reporting recommendations should help researchers, authors and reviewers to contribute comprehensive reports, so that the ion mobility data can be reused more confidently. Starting from the concept of the definition of the measurand, we emphasize that (i) mobility values (K0) depend intrinsically on ion structure, the nature of the bath gas, temperature, and E/N, (ii) ion mobility does not measure surfaces directly, but collision cross section (CCS) values are derived from mobility values using a physical model, (iii) methods relying on calibration are empirical (and thus may provide method-dependent results) only if the gas nature, temperature or E/N cannot match those of the primary method. Our analysis highlights the urgency of a community effort towards establishing primary standards and reference materials for ion mobility, and provides recommendations to do so. <br><br><br>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document