Focal Therapy in Other Genitourinary Systems: Renal Cell Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Joseph A. Graversen ◽  
Jaime Landman
2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Jacqueline D. Viilalta ◽  
Jamie Ritchey ◽  
Andrew K. Stewart ◽  
Peter R. Carroll

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 520-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence Albiges ◽  
Ronan Flippot ◽  
Julia Arfi-Rouche ◽  
Caroline Caramella ◽  
Fiorella Ruatta ◽  
...  

520 Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are associated with poor prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients with BM were excluded from pivotal studies of nivolumab in mRCC. Therefore, activity of nivolumab in BM is currently unknown. Methods: Data from mRCC patients with BMs, treated at Gustave Roussy with nivolumab, were collected. RECIST 1.1 assessments of both BM and metastatic sites outside the brain have been prospectively centrally reviewed. Treatment for BM: surgery, stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and systemic treatment were collected. Results: Between February 2016 and September 2016, 62 consecutive patients have been treated with nivolumab in 2nd/3rdline at Gustave Roussy as part of the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN trial (EudraCT 2015-004117). Among those, 8 patients (13%) had baseline non symptomatic BM, either untreated (n=6), or after SBRT (n=2). Among the 8 patients, median follow up from study enrollment is 8.1 months (range: 3.7-8.5). All 8 patients are alive at the time of analysis, only one still receiving nivolumab. 6/6 patients previously untreated required focal therapy to the brain due to early symptomatic disease progression to the brain: SBRT=5; surgery=1; WBRT=1 (one patient had SBRT +WBRT). Disease progression of BM was symptomatic in 8/8 patients and required steroid use as well as nivolumab discontinuation in 7/8 patients due to either brain and/or systemic disease progression. Conclusions: To our knowledge,this is the first experience evaluating BMs from mRCC treated with nivolumab. Our report suggests that BM from mRCC may not derive benefit from nivolumab and that prior focal therapy to the brain may be discussed in patients before nivolumab start. This finding is currently being investigated in the entire GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN trial population (n=499 patients, from 27 centers), which included 54 patients (11%) with BM at treatment start, to be presented at ASCO GU.[Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e52-e57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurdo Barwari ◽  
Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette ◽  
M. Pilar Laguna

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Marco Roscigno ◽  
Roberto Bertini ◽  
Cesare Cozzarini ◽  
Alessandra Pasta ◽  
Mattia Sangalli ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Brian L. Egleston ◽  
Ismail R. Saad ◽  
Robert G. Uzzo

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 305-305
Author(s):  
Richard A. Ashley ◽  
Jonathan C. Routh ◽  
Sameer A. Siddiqui ◽  
Brant A. Inman ◽  
Thomas J. Sebo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 303-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Klatte ◽  
Heiko Wunderlich ◽  
Jean-Jacques Patard ◽  
Mark D. Kleid ◽  
John S. Lam ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 301-301
Author(s):  
Yasumasa Iimura ◽  
Kazutaka Saito ◽  
Minato Yokoyama ◽  
Hitoshi Masuda ◽  
Tsuyoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document