1252: Relative Survival Following Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)- A S.E.E.R. Analysis: Is Age Important?

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Brian L. Egleston ◽  
Ismail R. Saad ◽  
Robert G. Uzzo
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Relative Survival

Survival Trends among Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binay Kumar Shah ◽  
Krishna Bilas Ghimire
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Since the approval of sorafenib in December 2005, several targeted therapeutic agents have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study was conducted to find out whether the improvements in survival of advanced RCC patients with targeted agents have translated into a survival benefit in a population-based cohort. Methods: We analyzed the SEER 18 (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) registry database to calculate the relative survival rates for advanced RCC patients during 2001-2009, 2001-2005, 2006-2007 and 2008-2009. We also evaluated the survival rates by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and sex. Results: The total number of advanced RCC patients during 2001-2009, 2001-2005, 2006-2007 and 2008-2009 were 7,047, 4,059, 1,548 and 1,440, respectively. During 2001-2009, the 1- and 3-year relative survival rates were 26.7 ± 0.6 and 10.0 ± 0.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 1-year relative survival rates for patients diagnosed during 2006-2007 and 2008-2009 compared to those diagnosed during 2001-2005. Similarly, the 3-year survival rates for patients diagnosed during 2006-2007 were similar to those diagnosed during 2001-2005. Conclusions: This population-based study showed that there was no significant improvement in relative survival rates among advanced RCC patients in the era of targeted agents.

Survival trends among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the United States.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 422-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binay Kumar Shah ◽  
Krishna Bilas Ghimire
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
P Value ◽  
Targeted Agents

422 Background: Since approval of sorafenib in December 2005, several targeted therapeutic agents have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. This study was conducted to find out whether the improvements in survival of advanced RCC patients with targeted agents have translated into survival benefit in population-based cohort. Methods: We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry database to compare 1- and 3-year relative survival rates among advanced RCC patients during 2001-2009, 2001-2004, and 2006-2009. We also evaluated the survival rates by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and sex. We used SEER*Stat software to analyze the data. Results: The total number of advanced RCC patients during 2001-2009, 2001-2004, and 2006-2009 were 7,055, 3,355 and 2,985 respectively. During 2001-2009, the 1- and 3-year relative survival rates were 26.7± 0.6% and 10.0±0.4% respectively. The 1-year relative survival rates during 2001-2004 and 2006-2009 were 27.0±0.8% and 27.1±0.9%, (p value=1.3) respectively. Similarly, the 3-year survival rates during 2001-2004 and 2006-2009 were 10.1±0.6% and 9.6±0.8%, (p value=1.42), respectively. There was no significant difference in survival rates during 2001-2004 and 2006-2009 periods by age and sex. Conclusions: This population based study showed that there was no significant improvement in relative survival rates among advanced RCC patients in the era of targeted agents. As with other database analyses, limitations of this large study may be incomplete reporting practices and lack of data on treatment.

scholarly journals Progress in survival in renal cell carcinoma through 50 years evaluated in Finland and Sweden

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253236
Author(s):  
Kari Hemminki ◽  
Asta Försti ◽  
Akseli Hemminki ◽  
Börje Ljungberg ◽  
Otto Hemminki
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
The Difference

Global survival studies have shown favorable development in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treatment but few studies have considered extended periods or covered populations for which medical care is essentially free of charge. We analyzed RCC survival in Finland and Sweden over a 50-year period (1967–2016) using data from the NORDCAN database provided by the local cancer registries. While the health care systems are largely similar in the two countries, the economic resources have been stronger in Sweden. In addition to the standard 1- and 5-year relative survival rates, we calculated the difference between these as a measure of how well survival was maintained between years 1 and 5. Relative 1- year survival rates increased almost linearly in both countries and reached 90% in Sweden and 80% in Finland. Although 5-year survival also developed favorably the difference between 1- and 5-year survival rates did not improve in Sweden suggesting that the gains in 5-year survival were entirely due to gains in 1-year survival. In Finland there was a gain in survival between years 1 and 5, but the gain in 1-years survival was the main contributor to the favorable 5-year survival. Age group specific analysis showed large survival differences, particularly among women. Towards the end of the follow-up period the differences narrowed but the disadvantage of the old patients remained in 5-year survival. The limitations of the study were lack of information on performed treatment and clinical stage in the NORDCAN database. In conclusion, the available data suggest that earlier diagnosis and surgical treatment of RCC have been the main driver of the favorable change in survival during the past 50 years. The main challenges are to reduce the age-specific survival gaps, particularly among women, and push survival gains past year 1.

scholarly journals Immune cell mediated cabozantinib resistance for patients with renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keon Young Park ◽  
Hunter O Hefti ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Karina M Lugo-Cintrón ◽  
Sheena C Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Partial Least Square ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Partial Least Square Regression ◽  
T Cell Subsets

Abstract Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common genitourinary cancer in the USA. Despite recent advances in the treatment for advanced and metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC), the 5-year relative survival rate for the distant disease remains at 12%. Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which is one of the first-line therapies approved to treat advanced ccRCC as a single agent, is now being investigated as a combination therapy with newer immunotherapeutic agents. However, not much is known about how cabozantinib modulates the immune system. Here, we present a high throughput tri-culture model that incorporates cancer cells, endothelial cells, and patient-derived immune cells to study the effect of immune cells from patients with ccRCC on angiogenesis and cabozantinib resistance. We show that circulating immune cells from patients with ccRCC induce cabozantinib resistance via increased secretion of a set of pro-angiogenic factors. Using multivariate partial least square regression modeling, we identified CD4+ T cell subsets that are correlated with cabozantinib resistance and report the changes in the frequency of these populations in ccRCC patients who are undergoing cabozantinib therapy. These findings provide a potential set of biomarkers that should be further investigated in the current TKI-immunotherapy combination clinical trials to improve personalized treatments for patients with ccRCC.

scholarly journals Clinico-pathological analysis of renal cell carcinoma demonstrates decreasing tumour grade over a 17-year period

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Nason ◽  
Barry B. McGuire ◽  
Michael E. Kelly ◽  
Theodore M. Murphy ◽  
Aisling T. Looney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Tnm Classification ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Hospital Data

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents about 3% of adult malignancies in Ireland. Worldwide there is a reported increasing incidence and recent studies report a stage migration towards smaller tumours. We assess the clinico-pathological features and survival of patients with RCC in a surgically treated cohort.Methods: A retrospective analysis of all nephrectomies carried out between 1995 and 2012 was carried out in an Irish tertiary referral university hospital. Data recorded included patient demographics, size of tumour, tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, operative details and final pathology. The data were divided into 3 equal consecutive time periods for comparison purposes: Group1 (1995-2000), Group 2 (2001-2006) and Group 3 (2007-2012). Survival data were verified with the National Cancer Registry of Ireland.Results: In total, 507 patients underwent nephrectomies in the study period. The median tumour size was 5.8 cm (range: 1.2-20 cm) and there was no statistical reduction in size observed overtime (p = 0.477). A total of 142 (28%) RCCs were classified as pT1a, 111 (21.9%) were pT1b, 67 (13.2%) were pT2, 103 (20.3%) were pT3a, 75 (14.8%) were pT3b and 9 (1.8%) were pT4. There was no statistical T-stage migration observed (p = 0.213). There was a significant grade reduction over time (p = 0.017). There was significant differences noted in overall survival between the T-stages (p < 0.001), nuclear grades (p < 0.001) and histological subtypes (p = 0.022).Conclusion: There was a rising incidence in the number of nephrectomies over the study period. Despite previous reports, a stage migration was not evident; however, a grade reduction was apparent in this Irish surgical series. We can demonstrate that tumour stage, nuclear grade and histological subtype are significant prognosticators of relative survival in RCC.

Impact of comorbidity burden on renal cell carcinoma prognosis: A Danish nationwide cohort study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 360-360
Author(s):  
Trine Allerslev Horsbøll ◽  
Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton ◽  
Jane Christensen ◽  
Astrid Petersen ◽  
Nessn H. Azawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
And Gender

360 Background: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma is increasing worldwide and have a 5-year relative survival rates of around 75%. Comorbidity has been found to be associated with complications and mortality after renal cancer surgery. No studies have focused on comorbidity as a prognostic factor in a nationwide cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma with long-term follow-up. Purpose: The primary aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of comorbidity on survival in older (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma. Methods: We established a nationwide register-based cohort of 7,894 patients aged 18 or more diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma in Denmark between 2006 and 2017, and followed their vital status for up to 13 years. We computed 1- and 5-year overall survival and hazard ratios (HRs) of death according to comorbidity status using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) among patients aged < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. Results: In all, 36% of the patients had registered comorbidity at the time of diagnosis. Survival decreased with increasing CCI score. It did though increase for all groups of CCI scores (0, 1-2 and 3+) over time. For patients without comorbidity diagnosed in 2006-2008 and 2015-2017, 5-year survival rate increased from 57% to 69%. For patients with a CCI score of 1-2 vs 3, the 5-year survival rate increased from 46% to 62% vs 39% to 44%. In age- and gender-stratified analyses, patients with a CCI score of 1-2 and 3+ had increased mortality compared to patients without registered comorbidity (HR 1.15, 95 % CI 1.06-1.24) and (HR 1.56, 95 % CI 1.40-1.73). Patterns were similar for older (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients. Particularly, diagnoses of congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, preexisting renal and liver disease, diabetes and lymphoma led to increased mortality. Conclusions: Comorbidity leads to inferior survival outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma, irrespective of age, despite an overall increasing survival. These data may guide patient counseling and prompt initiatives for controlling comorbidity.

scholarly journals Age, Tumor Size and Relative Survival of Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 506-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Scoll ◽  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Brian L. Egleston ◽  
David A. Kunkle ◽  
Ismail R. Saad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
End Results

1253: Different Survival in PT3A Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sinus Fat Invasion or Perinephric Fat Invasion

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Marco Roscigno ◽  
Roberto Bertini ◽  
Cesare Cozzarini ◽  
Alessandra Pasta ◽  
Mattia Sangalli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Perinephric Fat
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document