Conservative management of breast cancer by exclusive radiation therapy following Neo-Adjuvant chemotherapy : results in 236 patients with a minimum 5 years follow-up

Author(s):  
F. Baillet ◽  
C. Jacquillat ◽  
M. Housset ◽  
B. Q. Hu ◽  
S. Delanian ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Vittoria Dieci ◽  
Gaia Griguolo ◽  
Michele Bottosso ◽  
Vassilena Tsvetkova ◽  
Carlo Alberto Giorgi ◽  
...  

AbstractAlthough 1% is the recommended cut-off to define estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, a 10% cut-off is often used in clinical practice for therapeutic purposes. We here evaluate clinical outcomes according to ER levels in a monoinstitutional cohort of non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinicopathological data of 406 patients with ER < 10% HER2-negative BC treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy between 01/2000 and 04/2019 were collected. Patients were categorized in ER-negative (ER < 1%; N = 364) and ER-low positive (1–9%, N = 42). At a median follow-up of 54 months, 88 patients had relapsed and 64 died. No significant difference was observed in invasive relapse-free survival (iRFS) and overall survival (OS) according to ER expression levels, both at univariate and multivariate analysis (5-years iRFS 74.0% versus 73.1% for ER-negative and ER-low positive BC, respectively, p = 0.6; 5-years OS 82.3% versus 76.7% for ER-negative and ER-low positive BC, respectively, p = 0.8). Among the 165 patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological complete response rate was similar in the two cohorts (38% in ER-negative, 44% in ER-low positive, p = 0.498). In conclusion, primary BC with ER1–9% shows similar clinical behavior to ER 1% BC. Our results suggest the use of a 10% cut-off, rather than <1%, to define triple-negative BC.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (21) ◽  
pp. 3422-3428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Procter ◽  
Thomas M. Suter ◽  
Evandro de Azambuja ◽  
Urania Dafni ◽  
Veerle van Dooren ◽  
...  

Purpose We investigated the incidence of cardiac adverse events in patients with early breast cancer in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial who were treated with 1 year of trastuzumab after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods The HERA trial is a three-group, randomized trial that compared 1 year or 2 years of trastuzumab with observation in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) –positive early breast cancer. Eligible patients had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; ≥ 55%) after completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Cardiac function was monitored throughout the trial. This analysis considers patients randomly assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab treatment or observation. Results There were 1,698 patients randomly assigned to observation and 1,703 randomly assigned to 1 year of trastuzumab treatment; 94.1% of patients had been treated with anthracyclines. The incidence of discontinuation of trastuzumab because of cardiac disorders was low (5.1%). At a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the incidence of cardiac end points remained low, though it was higher in the trastuzumab group than in the observation group (severe CHF, 0.8% v 0.0%; confirmed significant LVEF decreases, 3.6% v 0.6%) In the trastuzumab group, 59 of 73 patients with a cardiac end point reached acute recovery; of these 59 patients, 52 were considered by the cardiac advisory board (CAB) to have a favorable outcome from the cardiac end point. Conclusion The incidence of cardiac end points remains low even after longer-term follow-up. The cumulative incidence of any type of cardiac end point increases during the scheduled treatment period of 1 year, but it remains relatively constant thereafter.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 538-538
Author(s):  
Jose Pablo Leone ◽  
Bernard F. Cole ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Beat J. K. Thurlimann ◽  
Alan S. Coates ◽  
...  

538 Background: Endocrine therapy resistance is a major cause of distant recurrence (DR) in HR+ breast cancer. Currently, no data exists evaluating differences in clinical behavior after DR between patients (pts) treated in the adjuvant setting with different endocrine therapy regimens. The aim of this study was to analyze post-DR survival of pts treated on BIG 1-98. Methods: BIG 1-98 compared 5 years of adjuvant treatment between 4 arms: tamoxifen (T), letrozole (L), T followed by L (TL) and L followed by T (LT). After 8.1 years median follow-up (follow-up through 2010), 911 (T n = 302, L n = 285, TL n = 170, LT n = 154) of 8010 pts had DR as site of first recurrence. Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were performed to determine features associated with post-DR survival. With 661 total observed deaths, statistical power was 0.8 to detect a hazard ratio (HaR) > 1.24 at the 2-sided 0.05 level of significance. Results: Median follow up time after DR was 59 months (IQR: 29-88). Among all pts with DR, 38.1% were ≥ 65 years at study enrollment, 61.9% had tumor size > 2 cm, 69.7% were node positive. Neo/adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 35.6% of pts. There was no difference in post-DR survival by treatment arm (median survival: T 20.8, L 17.9, TL 17.3, LT 20.8 months; p = 0.21). In multivariable analysis, older pts (HaR 1.36; p = 0.0002), tumors > 2cm (HaR 1.2; p = 0.04), ≥ 4 positive nodes (HaR 1.32; p = 0.05) and PR- tumors (HaR 1.28; p = 0.001) had significantly worse post-DR survival. Endocrine treatment arm, type of surgery, radiotherapy and neo/adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with post-DR survival in the multivariate model. Conclusions: Treatment with adjuvant T, L or their sequence were not associated with differences in survival after DR. We observed significant differences in survival by primary tumor size, nodal and PR status, which suggest that traditional high-risk features remain prognostic in the metastatic setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00004205.


2004 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Geinitz ◽  
Frank B. Zimmermann ◽  
Reinhard Thamm ◽  
Monika Keller ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shozo Ohsumi ◽  
Sachiko Kiyoto ◽  
Mina Takahashi ◽  
Seiki Takashima ◽  
Kenjiro Aogi ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Scalp cooling during chemotherapy infusion to mitigate alopecia for breast cancer patients is becoming widespread; however, studies regarding hair recovery after chemotherapy with scalp cooling are limited. We conducted a prospective study of hair recovery after chemotherapy with scalp cooling. Patients and methods One hundred and seventeen Japanese female breast cancer patients who completed planned (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy using the Paxman Scalp Cooling System for alopecia prevention were evaluated for alopecia prevention in our prospective study. We evaluated their hair recovery 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 months after chemotherapy. Primary outcomes were grades of alopecia judged by two investigators (objective grades) and patients’ answers to the questionnaire regarding the use of a wig or hat (subjective grades). Results Of 117 patients, 75 completed scalp cooling during the planned chemotherapy cycles (Group A), but 42 discontinued it mostly after the first cycle (Group B). Objective and subjective grades were significantly better in Group A than in Group B throughout 1 year, and at 4 and 7 months after chemotherapy. When we restricted patients to those with objective Grade 3 (hair loss of > 50%) at 1 month, Group A exhibited slightly faster hair recovery based on the objective grades than Group B. There was less persistent alopecia in Group A than in Group B. Conclusions Scalp cooling during chemotherapy infusion for Japanese breast cancer patients increased the rate of hair recovery and had preventive effects against persistent alopecia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document