scholarly journals Wide-Area Heritage Projects in Lombardy: From a Mono-Sector to a Multi-Sector Approach

Heritage ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 4304-4317
Author(s):  
Cristina Boniotti
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Community Involvement ◽  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Wide Area ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
Direct Participation

A public-private partnership (P3) and public-private-people partnership (P4) are amongst the institutional options available when it comes to funding cultural heritage management through the involvement of private players pertaining to the business or third sectors, respectively. In light of the growing relevance of P4 operations as a means to improve heritage management, this paper aims at analyzing the initiatives developed by the Fondazione Cariplo banking foundation, which can be considered exemplary instances of P4. A total of two projects were selected, which go by the name of Distretti Culturali and AttivAree, respectively, and may serve as highly indicative examples of community involvement and multi-sector-oriented action. To conduct a truly realistic analysis and reliably measure the adequacy of the outcomes obtained, interviews with the parties involved were performed and direct participation in the projects was provided for. Considering, also, that funding has, so far, typically been aimed at interventions on individual buildings, the foundation has managed to develop some true cross-sector programs, and thus further refine the multi-sector approach most likely to prove useful in future community-centered initiatives. Herein, some of the features are isolated; those which we deem most suitable for adoption in the planning of future cultural heritage-related projects.

scholarly journals TINGGALAN MEGALITIK DI KAWASAN PASEMAH SUMATERA SELATAN: KAJIAN ARKEOLOGI PUBLIK

KALPATARU ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Rr. Triwurjani
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Suitable Model ◽  
Discussion Forums ◽  
Archaeological Remains ◽  
Daily Lives ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Right ◽  
Almost All

  Abstract. In this globalization era, the management of cultural heritage has improved significantly. The general public is now considered capable and has the right to manage their cultural heritage. The problem is how to make archaeology needed by the public and becomes part of their daily lives. Previous researches show that almost all megalithic remains in Pasemah, particularly the statues, are broken, and many stone burials and dolmens are transformed into washing boards or building foundations. This research aims to seek a suitable model for public-based management of cultural heritage in Pasemah. The method used in this research is descriptive-explanatory which is used to explain the phenomenon of archaeological remains and their surroundings. There is also interviews with individuals or communities related with the cultural heritage management. The research reveals that the community now is more aware about the issue and expecting for more courses or discussion forums about cultural heritage in their regions. In addition to preservation of the cultural heritage in Pasemah area, this research also encourages people to be proud of their culture as part of the national identity.  Keywords: Public archaeology, management, megalithic in Pasemah, nation identity  Abstrak. Pada era globalisasi saat ini pengelolaan warisan budaya mengalami perkembangan sangat signifikan, yang semula bertujuan untuk kepentingan negara/pemerintahan sekarang menjadi pengelolaan untuk masyarakat luas. Masyarakat diangggap mampu dan berhak mengelola warisan budaya. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana arkeologi bisa dibutuhkan oleh masyarakat dan menjadi bagian dari kehidupan sehari-hari masyarakat itu sendiri. Hasil penelitian di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa hampir semua tinggalan megalitik di Kawasan Pasemah, Sumatera Selatan, memperlihatkan kondisi yang tidak utuh, seperti arca-arca dan kubur batu (dolmen) yang hilang atau beralih fungsi menjadi papan cuci dan pondasi rumah. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui model pengelolaan tinggalan budaya berbasis masyarakat, khususnya pada masyarakat di kawasan Pasemah. Metode yang digunakan bersifat deskriptif eksplanatif, yaitu menjelaskan fenomena tinggalan arkeologis dan lingkungannya dan melakukan wawancara secara mendalam melalui diskusi terfokus dengan pihak terkait yang dianggap berkepentingan terhadap pengelolaaan tinggalan budaya tersebut. Hasilnya adalah sebuah pemahaman tentang keterlibatan masyarakat dan menjadikan arkeologi sebagai bagian dari kehidupan yang profan di mana masyarakat meminta diadakan pelatihan ataupun ceramah arkeologi tentang tinggalan di daerahnya. Manfaat dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melestarikan warisan budaya di kawasan Pasemah dan memicu rasa kebanggaan terhadap budaya sendiri sebagai identitas bangsa. Kata kunci: Arkeologi publik, pengelolaan, megalitik pasemah, identitas bangsa

scholarly journals The public–private–people partnership (P4) for cultural heritage management purposes

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Boniotti
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Community Involvement ◽  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Italian Context

PurposeIn light of the difficulties the governments typically face in conserving and managing their rich public cultural heritage, which often lingers in a condition of neglect, this study aims to identify a set of additional tools capable of providing adequate financial resources as well as skills.Design/methodology/approachThe general research methodology adopted is of a qualitative, rather than a quantitative, nature. In fact, the resulting considerations are mainly the consequence of a first broad theoretical examination, aimed at analyzing the different management models a public entity may adopt, and an applicable verification, aimed at describing some case histories selected by means of interviews.FindingsThe study develops a preliminary reflection on possible sector-specific models for public-built cultural heritage management that have not been well defined yet, especially so in reference to one of the institutional options, namely, the adoption of public–private–people agreements. Indeed, in addition to establishing the ties needed to link public institutions with the business sector, some strong involvement of society as a whole is advised to foster the implementation of projects and expedite the solution of shared problems. At a local level, for instance, private stakeholder participation must be encouraged, with special attention to the latter's cultural closeness to the territory involved.Originality/valueThis research identifies some tools suitable for adoption in the cultural heritage field, which would serve as perfect examples of community involvement and commitment, and some useful case studies resulting from the Italian context.

scholarly journals Thirty-Two Years of Integrating Archaeology and Heritage Management in Belize: A Brief History of the Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance (BVAR) Project’s Engagement with the Public

Heritage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-732
Author(s):  
Julie A. Hoggarth ◽  
Jaime J. Awe ◽  
Claire E. Ebert ◽  
Rafael A. Guerra ◽  
Antonio Beardall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Archaeological Research ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Scientific Investigations ◽  
Heritage Education ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ancient Monuments ◽  
Successes And Challenges

Since its inception in 1988, the Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance (BVAR) Project has had two major foci, that of cultural heritage management and archaeological research. While research has concentrated on excavation and survey, the heritage management focus of the project has included the preservation of ancient monuments, the integration of archaeology and tourism development, and cultural heritage education. In this paper, we provide a brief overview on the history of scientific investigations by the BVAR Project, highlighting the project’s dual heritage management and research goals. This background offers the basis in which to discuss the successes and challenges of the project’s efforts in cultural heritage management and public engagement, particularly in early conservation efforts, in its training and educational efforts, and its ongoing outreach activity. We emphasize the need to train Belizeans as professional archaeologists and conservators, to serve as the next generation of advocates for Belize’s heritage management. We offer some ideas on how research projects can make significant contributions to heritage education and preservation in the developing world.

Codes of ethics: form and function in cultural heritage management

1998 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
PJ O'Keefe
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Codes Of Ethics ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Form And Function ◽  
And Function ◽  
Valuable Role

Many institutions and organizations of professionals have promulgated 'codes' of ethics in recent years in order both to establish accepted practices of professionals in various disciplines and to deal with problems raised by the unique aspects of cultural heritage issues. The author follows the processes of formulation, role, influence, interpretation, and effectiveness of such codes, as well as their relationship to the legal system. While acknowledging that it is often difficult to enforce these codes, the author suggests that they serve a valuable role both in educating the members of the various organizations and the public and in establishing goals for which these professionals aspire.

scholarly journals Staging Antiquity: A Comparison of Five Greek Cultural Heritage Sites and The Construction of Their Authenticity

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-23
Author(s):  
Håkan Karlsson ◽  
Anders Gustafsson
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Cultural Process ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Control Power ◽  
The Past

The text consists of an analysis of how the classical Greek sites of Marathon, Thermopylae, Delphi, Olympia and Mycenae are staged and presented to the public. This analysis is focused upon how the cultural heritage management views the authenticity of these sites and their physical remains, (i.e., as genuine) phenomenon firmly, and solely, belonging to the past, and how these attitudes are materialized in the form of presentations at information boards and in the physical staging of the sites. The materialization of this attitude constitutes the conditions for the public’s physical and imaginative access to the sites and for the public’s possibility to reflect critically around them. Thus, the sites are products of the past, but their authenticity is in parallel also a product of its role in present negotiations of interpretive supremacy, control, power and politics. The article further stresses that a changed attitude towards authenticity is crucial also for a development of a constructive relationship between heritage management and the public. In accordance with this, the article also presents a reconstructed view of authenticity—as the cultural process constituting both humans and material remains.

scholarly journals Italian Archaeology: heritage, protection and enhancement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Giorgio ◽  
Oriana Cerbone ◽  
Alessandro Garrisi ◽  
Cristiana La Serra ◽  
Valentina Leonelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Public Archaeology ◽  
Heritage Management ◽  
Private Funding ◽  
Cultural Heritage Management ◽  
The Public ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Regulatory Frameworks ◽  
Heritage Protection

Italy has a long tradition of cultural heritage management, which has been framed in an art historical context. This paper outlines the challenges to public archaeology, as it is often seen as a cost rather than as a benefit. Examples are provided showing how museums and heritage sites can be made more inclusive and welcoming to all members of the public, using a combination of private funding and public regulatory frameworks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document