Flares: Nonthermal Particles

Author(s):  
Markus J. Aschwanden
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 759-768
Author(s):  
Yu. Yu. Kartavykh ◽  
V. M. Ostryakov ◽  
E. Möbius ◽  
M. A. Popecki

2003 ◽  
Vol 594 (2) ◽  
pp. 709-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Berrington ◽  
Charles D. Dermer
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 644 ◽  
pp. A172
Author(s):  
A. Warmuth ◽  
G. Mann

Context. In solar flares, energy is released impulsively and is partly converted into thermal energy of hot plasmas and kinetic energy of accelerated nonthermal particles. It is crucial to constrain the partition of these two energy components to understand energy release and transport as well as particle acceleration in solar flares. Despite numerous efforts, no consensus on quantifying this energy balance has yet been reached. Aims. We aim to understand the reasons for the contradicting results on energy partition obtained by various recent studies. The overarching question we address is whether there is sufficient energy in nonthermal particles to account for the thermal flare component. Methods. We considered five recent studies that address the thermal-nonthermal energy partition in solar flares. Their results are reviewed, and their methods are compared and discussed in detail. Results. The main uncertainties in deriving the energy partition are identified as (a) the derivation of the differential emission measure distribution and (b) the role of the conductive energy loss for the thermal component, as well as (c) the determination of the low-energy cutoff for the injected electrons. The bolometric radiated energy, as a proxy for the total energy released in the flare, is a useful independent constraint on both thermal and nonthermal energetics. In most of the cases, the derived energetics are consistent with this constraint. There are indications that the thermal-nonthermal energy partition changes with flare strength: in weak flares, there appears to be a deficit of energetic electrons, while the injected nonthermal energy is sufficient to account for the thermal component in strong flares. This behavior is identified as the main cause of the dissimilar results in the studies we considered. The changing partition has two important consequences: (a) an additional direct (i.e. non-beam) heating mechanism has to be present, and (b) considering that the bolometric emission originates mainly from deeper atmospheric layers, conduction or waves are required as additional energy transport mechanisms.


1994 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 945-948
Author(s):  
Charles D. Dermer ◽  
Reinhard Schlickeiser

AbstractCompton scattering of external radiation by nonthermal particles in outflowing blazar jets is dominated by accretion-disk photons rather than scattered radiation to distances ~ 0.01-0.1 pc from the central engine for standard parameters, thus clarifying the limits of validity of the model by the present authors and the model of Sikora, Begelman, & Rees. On the basis of contemporaneous Ginga X-ray and EGRET gamma-ray observations, we estimate the radius of 3C 279’s gamma-ray photosphere to be smaller than estimated by Blandford. There is thus no need to require that the acceleration and emission sites of gamma-ray blazars to be located farther than ~ 102 - 103 gravitational radii from the central engine. We argue that lineless BL Lac objects, rather than quasars, are more likely to be detected in the TeV energy range.Subject headings: acceleration of particles — BL Lacertae objects: general — galaxies: jets — gamma rays: theory — radiation mechanisms: nonthermal


1990 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 495-500
Author(s):  
N. Gopalswamy

We review some recent studies of mass ejections from the Sun using 2-D imaging observations of the Clark Lake multifrequency radioheliograph. Radio signatures of both fast and slow coronal mass ejections (CMEs) have been observed using the Clark Lake radioheliograph. Using temporal and positional analysis of moving type IV and type II bursts, and white light CMEs we find that the type II's and CMEs need not have a direct cause and effect relationship. Instead, the type II seems to be generated by a “decoupled shock”, probably due to an associated flare. The moving type IV burst requires nonthermal particles trapped in magnetic structures associated with the CME. Since nonthermal particles can be generated independent of the speed of CMEs, moving type IV bursts need not be associated only with fast CMEs. Specific examples are presented to support these views.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document