Pathway A: The Discursive-Circulatory System of (Non)being a Science Person—The Lived Social Life of Institutional Culture

Author(s):  
Sabrina Liccardo
Author(s):  
A. Rafikov

The author reflects on the role of social optimism as an essential new factor of institutional culture, which function is to guarantee a systemic unity of modern institution and its competitiveness related to another subjects of social interaction. The article presents the results of empirical research on social optimism and its role in social life according to the view of native experts’ community (doctors and candidates of psychological sciences in the sphere of social psychology). The variety of «social optimism» notions, determined by experts, is demonstrated; it is mentioned that such diversity is a natural result in conditions of absence of a stable scientific view regarding to that phenomenon. The list of content categories to define social optimism (such as system of knowledge, way of world-perceiving, faith, positive expectations, attitude, mechanism, copying-strategy etc.) is analyzed. The factors of institutional social optimism are classified: 1) optimistic corporative ideology and social support within the institution; 2) inclusion and a personal adaptive activity of the members of institution to organize individual and social existence; 3) positive expectations of the work itself, based on the previous positive experience and self-reflection; 4) correspondence of personal and common purposes of the members of institution. The article analyzed the factors of social optimism as those are represented by discourse of native experts’ community. The role of social optimism is outlined in the aspects of how it improves institutional environment and how it enhances institutional culture of modern organization and the ways of institution’s development.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Isabel Hall

Institutions are entities (rather than collections of individuals), with distinct characters andidentities that are most aptly explained in terms of institutional culture. The perceptions andactions of individuals embedded in a particular institutional culture are, to a significantextent, caused by that culture. This understanding of the relationship between institutionalculture and institutional actors has been incisively theorized in other disciplines, but isvirtually absent from tort law. As institutions have become increasingly important playersin social life, in comparison with individuals acting qua individuals, the absence of a robusttheory of the institutional tortfeasor has marginalized tort law and will continue to doso. Coherent theorization of an institutional tortfeasor requires the translation of ideasabout organizational culture and identity into the language of tort doctrine.


Crisis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Andriessen ◽  
Dolores Angela Castelli Dransart ◽  
Julie Cerel ◽  
Myfanwy Maple

Abstract. Background: Suicide can have a lasting impact on the social life as well as the physical and mental health of the bereaved. Targeted research is needed to better understand the nature of suicide bereavement and the effectiveness of support. Aims: To take stock of ongoing studies, and to inquire about future research priorities regarding suicide bereavement and postvention. Method: In March 2015, an online survey was widely disseminated in the suicidology community. Results: The questionnaire was accessed 77 times, and 22 records were included in the analysis. The respondents provided valuable information regarding current research projects and recommendations for the future. Limitations: Bearing in mind the modest number of replies, all from respondents in Westernized countries, it is not known how representative the findings are. Conclusion: The survey generated three strategies for future postvention research: increase intercultural collaboration, increase theory-driven research, and build bonds between research and practice. Future surveys should include experiences with obtaining research grants and ethical approval for postvention studies.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Nezlek ◽  
C. P. Hampton ◽  
G. D. Shean
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document