The Completeness Theorem

2020 ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Lorenz Halbeisen ◽  
Regula Krapf
Keyword(s):  
Completeness Theorem

On Statman's Finite Completeness Theorem

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Statman ◽  
Gilles Dowek
Keyword(s):  
Completeness Theorem

Algorithmic Logic with Recursive Functions

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 975-995
Author(s):  
Andrzej Szałas
Keyword(s):  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Inference Rules ◽  
Partial Correctness ◽  
Recursive Functions ◽  
Algorithmic Logic ◽  
Block Structured

A language is considered in which the reader can express such properties of block-structured programs with recursive functions as correctness and partial correctness. The semantics of this language is fully described by a set of schemes of axioms and inference rules. The completeness theorem and the soundness theorem for this axiomatization are proved.

PAL – Propositional Algorithmic Logic

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-760
Author(s):  
Grażyna Mirkowska
Keyword(s):  
Data Structures ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Natural Numbers ◽  
First Order ◽  
Algorithmic Logic ◽  
Axiomatic Systems ◽  
Nondeterministic Program ◽  
Basic Sets

The aim of propositional algorithmic logic is to investigate the properties of program connectives. Complete axiomatic systems for deterministic as well as for nondeterministic interpretations of program variables are presented. They constitute basic sets of tools useful in the practice of proving the properties of program schemes. Propositional theories of data structures, e.g. the arithmetic of natural numbers and stacks, are constructed. This shows that in many aspects PAL is close to first-order algorithmic logic. Tautologies of PAL become tautologies of algorithmic logic after replacing program variables by programs and propositional variables by formulas. Another corollary to the completeness theorem asserts that it is possible to eliminate nondeterministic program variables and replace them by schemes with deterministic atoms.

A Logically Justified Model of Computation I

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-172
Author(s):  
Pierangelo Miglioli ◽  
Mario Ornaghi
Keyword(s):  
Computer Science ◽  
Program Synthesis ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Program Execution ◽  
Computation Model ◽  
Clear Explanation ◽  
Direct Interpretation ◽  
Adequacy Condition ◽  
General Explanation

The aim of this paper is to provide a general explanation of the “algorithmic content” of proofs, according to a point of view adequate to computer science. Differently from the more usual attitude of program synthesis, where the “algorithmic content” is captured by translating proofs into standard algorithmic languages, here we propose a “direct” interpretation of “proofs as programs”. To do this, a clear explanation is needed of what is to be meant by “proof-execution”, a concept which must generalize the usual “program-execution”. In the first part of the paper we discuss the general conditions to be satisfied by the executions of proofs and consider, as a first example of proof-execution, Prawitz’s normalization. According to our analysis, simple normalization is not fully adequate to the goals of the theory of programs: so, in the second section we present an execution-procedure based on ideas more oriented to computer science than Prawitz’s. We provide a soundness theorem which states that our executions satisfy an appropriate adequacy condition, and discuss the sense according to which our “proof-algorithms” inherently involve parallelism and non determinism. The Properties of our computation model are analyzed and also a completeness theorem involving a notion of “uniform evaluation” of open formulas is stated. Finally, an “algorithmic completeness” theorem is given, which essentially states that every flow-chart program proved to be totally correct can be simulated by an appropriate “purely logical proof”.

scholarly journals Interpretability over peano arithmetic

1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1407-1425
Author(s):  
Claes Strannegård
Keyword(s):  
Modal Logic ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Peano Arithmetic ◽  
Embedding Theorem ◽  
Compactness Theorem ◽  
Partial Answer ◽  
Recursively Enumerable ◽  
Recursively Enumerable Sets ◽  
Interpretability Logic

AbstractWe investigate the modal logic of interpretability over Peano arithmetic. Our main result is a compactness theorem that extends the arithmetical completeness theorem for the interpretability logic ILMω. This extension concerns recursively enumerable sets of formulas of interpretability logic (rather than single formulas). As corollaries we obtain a uniform arithmetical completeness theorem for the interpretability logic ILM and a partial answer to a question of Orey from 1961. After some simplifications, we also obtain Shavrukov's embedding theorem for Magari algebras (a.k.a. diagonalizable algebras).

scholarly journals QUANTUM TEAM LOGIC AND BELL’S INEQUALITIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 722-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAPANI HYTTINEN ◽  
GIANLUCA PAOLINI ◽  
JOUKO VÄÄNÄNEN
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Probability Logic ◽  
Bell’S Inequalities ◽  
Dependence Logic ◽  
Logical Approach ◽  
Team Semantics ◽  
Bell's Inequalities

AbstractA logical approach to Bell’s Inequalities of quantum mechanics has been introduced by Abramsky and Hardy (Abramsky & Hardy, 2012). We point out that the logical Bell’s Inequalities of Abramsky & Hardy (2012) are provable in the probability logic of Fagin, Halpern and Megiddo (Fagin et al., 1990). Since it is now considered empirically established that quantum mechanics violates Bell’s Inequalities, we introduce a modified probability logic, that we call quantum team logic, in which Bell’s Inequalities are not provable, and prove a Completeness theorem for this logic. For this end we generalise the team semantics of dependence logic (Väänänen, 2007) first to probabilistic team semantics, and then to what we call quantum team semantics.

On the validity of hilbert's nullstellensatz, artin's theorem, and related results in grothendieck toposes

1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1177-1187
Author(s):  
W. A. MacCaull
Keyword(s):  
Intuitionistic Logic ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Rational Functions ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Polynomial Rings ◽  
Von Neumann ◽  
Ordered Fields ◽  
Von Neumann Regular ◽  
Theoretic Point

Using formally intuitionistic logic coupled with infinitary logic and the completeness theorem for coherent logic, we establish the validity, in Grothendieck toposes, of a number of well-known, classically valid theorems about fields and ordered fields. Classically, these theorems have proofs by contradiction and most involve higher order notions. Here, the theorems are each given a first-order formulation, and this form of the theorem is then deduced using coherent or formally intuitionistic logic. This immediately implies their validity in arbitrary Grothendieck toposes. The main idea throughout is to use coherent theories and, whenever possible, find coherent formulations of formulas which then allow us to call upon the completeness theorem of coherent logic. In one place, the positive model-completeness of the relevant theory is used to find the necessary coherent formulas.The theorems here deal with polynomials or rational functions (in s indeterminates) over fields. A polynomial over a field can, of course, be represented by a finite string of field elements, and a rational function can be represented by a pair of strings of field elements. We chose the approach whereby results on polynomial rings are reduced to results about the base field, because the theory of polynomial rings in s indeterminates over fields, although coherent, is less desirable from a model-theoretic point of view. Ultimately we are interested in the models.This research was originally motivated by the works of Saracino and Weispfenning [SW], van den Dries [Dr], and Bunge [Bu], each of whom generalized some theorems from algebraic geometry or ordered fields to (commutative, von Neumann) regular rings (with unity).

A completeness theorem for higher order logics

2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 857-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Sági
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Representation Theorem ◽  
Completeness Theorem ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Algebraic Solution ◽  
Algebraic Proof ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Strong Representation ◽  
Algebraic Counterpart

AbstractHere we investigate the classes of representable directed cylindric algebras of dimension α introduced by Németi [12]. can be seen in two different ways: first, as an algebraic counterpart of higher order logics and second, as a cylindric algebraic analogue of Quasi-Projective Relation Algebras. We will give a new, “purely cylindric algebraic” proof for the following theorems of Németi: (i) is a finitely axiomatizable variety whenever α ≥ 3 is finite and (ii) one can obtain a strong representation theorem for if one chooses an appropriate (non-well-founded) set theory as foundation of mathematics. These results provide a purely cylindric algebraic solution for the Finitization Problem (in the sense of [11]) in some non-well-founded set theories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document